[sage-devel] Re: Table of contents of the Sage reference manual

Really no more comments? Then please review: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22386 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@goog

Re: [sage-devel] A question about sage reference manual building

On Friday, March 10, 2017 at 9:31:38 AM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2017-03-10 00:11, Kwankyu Lee wrote: > > Am I understanding the situation right? > > Mostly. I think the problem is that the .rst files for removed Sage > library files are not removed. I investigated this problem,

Re: [sage-devel] "replacement" optional packages

On Sunday, March 12, 2017 at 10:05:56 PM UTC, François wrote: > > On 13/03/17 11:00, Justin C. Walker wrote: > > I'm trying to imagine surf without graphics (:-}), but perhaps that's > not what you mean exactly. > > > > Thanks for clarifying. > > I don't know surf :) but I imagine it can out

Re: [sage-devel] "replacement" optional packages

On 13/03/17 11:00, Justin C. Walker wrote: I'm trying to imagine surf without graphics (:-}), but perhaps that's not what you mean exactly. Thanks for clarifying. I don't know surf :) but I imagine it can output to jpeg and tiff directly. And if X is found to a basic x-window. If the gui off

Re: [sage-devel] "replacement" optional packages

On Mar 12, 2017, at 11:43 , Francois Bissey wrote: > >> On 13/03/2017, at 07:34, Justin C. Walker wrote: >> >> >> On Mar 12, 2017, at 00:27 , Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >>> there is no "issue" with pandoc. Most linux distros allow you to install it >>> using package manager, and it is easy to

Re: [sage-devel] build fails 'Cannot allocate memory'

On Sunday, March 12, 2017 at 6:01:29 PM UTC, lvas...@berkeley.edu wrote: > > Wow, it works! Yay! > to skip building sage's documentation, one can run 'make build' rather than just 'make'. building sage's docs is an unreasonably RAM-hungry process. How much memory does your VM use? Can you al

Re: [sage-devel] "replacement" optional packages

> On 13/03/2017, at 07:34, Justin C. Walker wrote: > > > On Mar 12, 2017, at 00:27 , Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >> there is no "issue" with pandoc. Most linux distros allow you to install it >> using package manager, and it is easy to install it on OSX or Windows. >> >> On the other hand, it ap

Re: [sage-devel] "replacement" optional packages

On Mar 12, 2017, at 00:27 , Dima Pasechnik wrote: > there is no "issue" with pandoc. Most linux distros allow you to install it > using package manager, and it is easy to install it on OSX or Windows. > > On the other hand, it appears that surf had never been ported to OSX. No: in fact, MacPor

Re: [sage-devel] build fails 'Cannot allocate memory'

Wow, it works! Yay! Thanks! Laurel On Sunday, March 12, 2017 at 10:46:02 AM UTC-7, David Roe wrote: > > I'm not sure how too help get the documentation to build, but sage itself > may be functional (documentation is the last step of the build process). > Try starting Sage and see if it works.

Re: [sage-devel] build fails 'Cannot allocate memory'

I'm not sure how too help get the documentation to build, but sage itself may be functional (documentation is the last step of the build process). Try starting Sage and see if it works. David On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 10:27 AM, wrote: > >

[sage-devel] build fails 'Cannot allocate memory'

[sage-devel] Re: Integral is divergent (playing with floor and ceil)

> you might simplify infinity-infinityto 0, Well, this is the wrong thing here... but sage is smarter than that, I believe. On Saturday, 11 March 2017 19:09:07 UTC+2, rjf wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, March 1, 2017 at 2:11:41 AM UTC-8, Peleg Michaeli wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have two questions,

Re: [sage-devel] "replacement" optional packages

> On 12/03/2017, at 21:38, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2017-03-12 09:35, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> X11? > > That can be disabled with --disable-gui Indeed X absence is not fatal in configure unlike libjpeg. I guess my point is that before saying it needs porting it should be tested in somethin

Re: [sage-devel] "replacement" optional packages

On 2017-03-12 09:27, Dima Pasechnik wrote: On the other hand, it appears that surf had never been ported to OSX. What does that mean? It just means that pandoc is more popular than surf. I somebody has really tried to compile surf on OS X and didn't manage, that would be a different story. Bu

Re: [sage-devel] "replacement" optional packages

On 2017-03-12 09:35, Dima Pasechnik wrote: X11? That can be disabled with --disable-gui -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@g

Re: [sage-devel] "replacement" optional packages

X11? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Vis

Re: [sage-devel] "replacement" optional packages

Apart from dependencies like jpeg what’s the problem with surf? François > On 12/03/2017, at 21:27, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > there is no "issue" with pandoc. Most linux distros allow you to install it > using package manager, and it is easy to install it on OSX or Windows. > > On the other h

Re: [sage-devel] "replacement" optional packages

there is no "issue" with pandoc. Most linux distros allow you to install it using package manager, and it is easy to install it on OSX or Windows. On the other hand, it appears that surf had never been ported to OSX. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [sage-devel] "replacement" optional packages

On 2017-03-11 20:18, Dima Pasechnik wrote: in this sense dependence on pandoc is OK, dependence on surf - much less so. Isn't the issue with surf the same as pandoc: it requires dependencies which are not part of Sage. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G