Le mercredi 28 septembre 2016 03:13:11 UTC+2, Jonathan Bober a écrit :
>
>
> Ah, yes, I'm wrong again, as the multimodular in Flint is pretty new. I
> didn't look at what Sage has until now (flint 2.5.2, which looks likes it
> uses a fairly simple O(n^4) algorithm). I had previously looked at t
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:34 PM, 'Bill Hart' via sage-devel <
sage-devel@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, 27 September 2016 20:53:28 UTC+2, Jonathan Bober wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 7:18 PM, 'Bill Hart' via sage-devel <
>> sage-...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm pretty sur
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:02 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Jonathan Bober
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 7:18 PM, 'Bill Hart' via sage-devel
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm pretty sure the charpoly routine in Flint is much more recent that 2
> >> years. Are you ref
I just noticed this thread because of your recent reply, and happened to
read through. (I haven't regularly read sage-devel for a while.)
As to your original email: I think there is a subtle python memory
management issue there. If you run
sage: BIG=myfunction(somevars)
sage: BIG=myfunction(somev
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> I may have time next weekend to containerize the buildbot, though no
> promises. It does need quite a lot of disk space (the old one was about 50GB
> iirc) to hold all the build logs and binary builds.
The new machine has 8TB of hard disks in
I may have time next weekend to containerize the buildbot, though no
promises. It does need quite a lot of disk space (the old one was about
50GB iirc) to hold all the build logs and binary builds. Whats the plan for
external networking and secrets?
On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 9:57:43 P
Tried but it didn't work out. MathCloud admins say they can't help. Tried
also at SageCell but the calculation wouldn't end either way after several
hours. Any ideas?
Denis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from th
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>> we can't, because there are filesize limits.
>> how about git-lfs ? (which is probably not cheap to use)
>
> I don't think we need any of that, a normal CDN is fine, too. Problem
>
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> we can't, because there are filesize limits.
> how about git-lfs ? (which is probably not cheap to use)
I don't think we need any of that, a normal CDN is fine, too. Problem
with using a commercial one is that the traffic is so expensive.
On Tuesday, 27 September 2016 20:53:28 UTC+2, Jonathan Bober wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 7:18 PM, 'Bill Hart' via sage-devel <
> sage-...@googlegroups.com > wrote:
>
>> I'm pretty sure the charpoly routine in Flint is much more recent that 2
>> years. Are you referring to a Sage implement
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 7:39 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> no volunteers to migrate files/build/rsync.sagemath.org... We should
>> just switch to GitHub.
>
> we can't, because there are filesize limits.
how about git-lfs ? (which is probably
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Jonathan Bober wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 7:18 PM, 'Bill Hart' via sage-devel
> wrote:
>>
>> I'm pretty sure the charpoly routine in Flint is much more recent that 2
>> years. Are you referring to a Sage implementation on top of Flint arithmetic
>> or somet
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 7:18 PM, 'Bill Hart' via sage-devel <
sage-devel@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> I'm pretty sure the charpoly routine in Flint is much more recent that 2
> years. Are you referring to a Sage implementation on top of Flint
> arithmetic or something?
>
It is just a problem with S
OS X 10.10.2 Yosemite:
$ ./sage -tp --long src/sage/libs/pari
--
All tests passed!
--
Total time for all tests: 9.1 seconds
cpu time: 14.0 seconds
I'm pretty sure the charpoly routine in Flint is much more recent that 2
years. Are you referring to a Sage implementation on top of Flint
arithmetic or something?
The only timing that I can find right at the moment had us about 5x faster
than Sage. It's not in a released version of Flint thoug
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 7:39 PM, William Stein wrote:
> no volunteers to migrate files/build/rsync.sagemath.org... We should
> just switch to GitHub.
we can't, because there are filesize limits.
-- h
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" gr
William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:10 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
Yes, both the file server files.sagemath.org and buildbot
build.sagemath.org
are down...
>>
>> I've done what I can and right now
>>
>>- files.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:10 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
>>> Yes, both the file server files.sagemath.org and buildbot build.sagemath.org
>>> are down...
>
> I've done what I can and right now
>
>- files.sagemath.org
>- rsync.sagemath.o
On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 11:23:49 PM UTC+2, Jonathan Bober wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori > wrote:
>
>> I suspect that perhaps the copy I have the works is working because I
>>> built it as sage 7.3 at some point with SAGE_ATLAS_LIB set and then rebuilt
On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 12:02:36 PM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 9:04:08 AM UTC, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> Somebody killed unauthorized git:// over the weekend... incorrect
>> firewall rule?
>>
>
> It was William, I suppose.
> Actually, disabling
20 matches
Mail list logo
