OS X 10.11.6 El Capitan:
--
All tests passed!
--
Total time for all tests: 5.2 seconds
cpu time: 9.8 seconds
cumulative wall time: 10.7 seconds
On
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 05:48:15AM -0700, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 1:03:27 AM UTC+2, John H Palmieri wrote:
> >
> > - all references should be, insofar as possible, in a standard form
> >
>
> There is one standard form for everything, even old papers, the Goog
Did this used to work? E.g. in a Sage notebook click the [x] Typeset
option and then execute:
---
%maxima
integrate(1/sin(x),x)
---
in a cell. My recollection is that this used to use maxima to generate
LaTeX and then display it typeset in the worksheet, i.e. the same as
---
maxima("integrate(1/(x
On 2016-09-24 15:58, Thierry wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 06:34:33AM -0700, Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
sage4 is going on as usual with 7.4.beta6, always giving us generously
wrong BuildFailed reports.
How was it not blocked when testing ticket 0 ? Perhaps should we require
each patchbot to ret
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 06:34:33AM -0700, Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
> sage4 is going on as usual with 7.4.beta6, always giving us generously
> wrong BuildFailed reports.
How was it not blocked when testing ticket 0 ? Perhaps should we require
each patchbot to retest ticket 0 at each new beta ?
Ci
sage4 is going on as usual with 7.4.beta6, always giving us generously
wrong BuildFailed reports.
Frederic
Le vendredi 23 septembre 2016 11:12:51 UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
>
> On 2016-09-23 08:51, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> > What has that to do with stopping the bot (or monitoring it at all,
Thank you very much Harald Schilly. Your work is appreciable, this inspires
me to stick to the organization. So it becomes sharing values rather than a
project.
On Saturday, September 24, 2016 at 4:10:24 PM UTC+5:30, Harald Schilly
wrote:
>
> This is taken care of.
>
>
--
You received this
You do have an account on the OSX buildbot in case you forgot ;-)
On Saturday, September 24, 2016 at 1:04:09 PM UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> If you have an OS X system and want to help Sage and PARI:
>
> 1. Checkout the branch at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21582
>
> 2. Run "./sage -i -
If you have an OS X system and want to help Sage and PARI:
1. Checkout the branch at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21582
2. Run "./sage -i -c all-build"
3. Run "./sage -tp --long src/sage/libs/pari" (or "make ptestlong" if
you have the time)
4. Report back to sage-devel
--
You received t
This is taken care of.
On Saturday, September 24, 2016 at 12:29:06 PM UTC+2, B Krishnan Iyer wrote:
>
> Hello folks!. Actually I had applied for the trac account few days back
> and I didn't got any response. Can anyone tell me how can I inquire about
> it.
>
--
You received this message becau
Hello folks!. Actually I had applied for the trac account few days back and
I didn't got any response. Can anyone tell me how can I inquire about it.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receivin
Wonderfull :)
Thanks a lot Jan and Eric
Best regards
Henri
Le 24/09/2016 à 11:16, Jan Groenewald a écrit :
Hi
OK, requesting copy to stable PPA on launchpad.
Regards,
Jan
On 24 September 2016 at 11:06, Eric Gourgoulhon
mailto:egourgoul...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I confirm that
Hi
OK, requesting copy to stable PPA on launchpad.
Regards,
Jan
On 24 September 2016 at 11:06, Eric Gourgoulhon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I confirm that the new package sagemath-upstream-binary-full, taken from
> the PPA aims/sagemath-dev works well: SageManifolds could be installed in
> it without any
Hi,
I confirm that the new package sagemath-upstream-binary-full, taken from
the PPA aims/sagemath-dev works well: SageManifolds could be installed in
it without any trouble and its test suite is passed.
Thanks a lot Jan !
Best regards,
Eric.
--
You received this message because you are s
14 matches
Mail list logo
