Re: [sage-devel] ReST References in Sphinx and uniqueness

On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 05:39:35PM +0200, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > General comment to all people complaining about Sphinx: reviewing existing > Sphinx-related tickets such as #20577 will show that you actually care and > will encourage other Sage developers to continue working on Sphinx. See also t

[sage-devel] Re: Project: LatticeWithIsometry

On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 11:20:55 AM UTC+2, Simon Brandhorst wrote: > > Dear all, > Dear Simon, > > I have written some code (toy implementation) in sage. It could be useful > for other people as well. > That is nice! I am sure it could be useful to other. > So now I am wondering

[sage-devel] Plotting cot() fails in Sage 7.2 and 7.3

A simple plot of the cotangent function has been failing since version 7.2. I opened a Trac ticket for this a week ago: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21365 The plotting method reports that it is unable to convert a complex to float for this function, even though the functional values look re

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Suggestion for main configure script to give package names for Latex.

On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 09:22:55AM -0700, Samuel Lelievre wrote: [...] > Dave's other suggestions would deserve a ticket... > I guess they could be summed up as follows: > > - Warn about the need to install or update g++ > (so its version matches the installed version of c++). > I think this i

[sage-devel] Re: ReST References in Sphinx and uniqueness

On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 11:46:22 AM UTC+2, Johan S. R. Nielsen wrote: > > I just ran into a doc issue that has been bothering me for years: global > uniqueness of reference labels in Sphinx. > Use two underscore instead of just one. ...at least, it works for links, I don't know for r

[sage-devel] Re: Suggestion for main configure script to give package names for Latex.

Hi Dima, On 2016-09-06, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > the whole world has basically gone to git nowadays, not only Sage. > Besides it's not so different from hg. IMHO, git and hg are "not so different" in the same way as PyObject* and object are "not so different": They feel totally different (at leas

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Suggestion for main configure script to give package names for Latex.

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) < drkir...@kirkbymicrowave.co.uk> wrote: > > > On Tuesday, 6 September 2016, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >> Hi David, >> >> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 9:08:25 AM UTC, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby >> Microwave Ltd) wrote: >>> >

[sage-devel] Re: Suggestion for main configure script to give package names for Latex.

On Tuesday, 6 September 2016, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Hi David, > > On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 9:08:25 AM UTC, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby > Microwave Ltd) wrote: >> >> I'm trying to migrate away from Solaris to Linux, given the takeover by >> Oracle. I decided to install the latest Debian (8.

Re: [sage-devel] ReST References in Sphinx and uniqueness

2016-09-06 17:39:38 UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer: > > General comment to all people complaining about Sphinx: reviewing > existing Sphinx-related tickets such as #20577 will show that you > actually care and will encourage other Sage developers to continue > working on Sphinx. > For instance https:

[sage-devel] Re: Suggestion for main configure script to give package names for Latex.

2016-09-06 18:02:33 UTC+2, leif: > > Samuel Lelievre wrote: > > > 2016-09-06 11:08:25 UTC+2, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd): > > > > > > PS, I found this page > > https://wiki.sagemath.org/devel/DebianSage > > > > last

[sage-devel] Re: bernoulli(250408) incorrect

2016-09-06 17:37:20 UTC+2, Alexander Weisse: > > > Dear Sage developers, > > the current version 2.5.2 of the flint library doesn't use enough > floating point precision in _arith_bernoulli_number_zeta(). This causes > bernoulli(250408) to be incorrect. > > Since Sage uses flint as the defaul

[sage-devel] Re: Suggestion for main configure script to give package names for Latex.

Samuel Lelievre wrote: > > > 2016-09-06 11:08:25 UTC+2, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd): > > > PS, I found this page > https://wiki.sagemath.org/devel/DebianSage > > last updated in 2009. Unless someone is willing to update i

[sage-devel] bernoulli(250408) incorrect

Dear Sage developers, the current version 2.5.2 of the flint library doesn't use enough floating point precision in _arith_bernoulli_number_zeta(). This causes bernoulli(250408) to be incorrect. Since Sage uses flint as the default algorithm for n<=30 the error affects Sage and can be obser

[sage-devel] Re: Suggestion for main configure script to give package names for Latex.

2016-09-06 11:08:25 UTC+2, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd): > PS, I found this page > https://wiki.sagemath.org/devel/DebianSage > last updated in 2009. Unless someone is willing to update it, I suggest it > might be better removed. > Thanks for this suggestion. I updated the page.

[sage-devel] Re: Suggestion for main configure script to give package names for Latex.

Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Hi David, > > On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 9:08:25 AM UTC, Dr. David Kirkby > (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote: > > I'm trying to migrate away from Solaris to Linux, given the takeover > by Oracle. I decided to install the latest Debian (8.5 == Jessie) , > and

[sage-devel] Re: Error building package: sagelib-7.4.beta2

> > 'pip' is a Sage standard package, hence ${SAGE_LOCAL}/bin/pip should be > there. > > Presumably a (newly introduced) race condition / missing dependency in > the Makefile. > > 'make pip && make' /may/ work; './sage -i pip && make' is more likely to > succeed I guess. > > Thanks for repo

[sage-devel] Re: Project: LatticeWithIsometry

O.K. It seems there is some functionality for positive definite lattices in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15976 and it hides in the sage source :). However I could not find anything for Indefinite "lattices". On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 11:20:55 AM UTC+2, Simon Brandhorst wrote: > > Dea

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ReST References in Sphinx and uniqueness

Dima Pasechnik writes: > > do you mean you don't do > > export MAKE="make -j4" > $MAKE > > (here 4 is the number of cores; replace with the correct value for your > setup; most modern desktops now have 8, I think) I'm probably in the stone age, and possibly suffer from a catastrophe bias, but

[sage-devel] Re: Project: LatticeWithIsometry

On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 9:20:55 AM UTC, Simon Brandhorst wrote: > > Dear all, > > I have written some code (toy implementation) in sage. It could be useful > for other people as well. > So now I am wondering whether I should make an effort to implement it > meeting the sage-devel stand

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ReST References in Sphinx and uniqueness

On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 5:59:19 AM UTC, Johan S. R. Nielsen wrote: > > > Regarding speed, there are two issues: > > > > 1. Building the documentation from scratch. I don't know if we can > expect > > this to go any faster. The PDF version of the documentation is 3,474 > pages > >

[sage-devel] Re: Suggestion for main configure script to give package names for Latex.

Hi David, On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 9:08:25 AM UTC, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote: > > I'm trying to migrate away from Solaris to Linux, given the takeover by > Oracle. I decided to install the latest Debian (8.5 == Jessie) , and Sage. > I have not succeeded yet, but some

Re: [sage-devel] Suggestion for main configure script to give package names for Latex.

Hi, did you have a look at this page ? http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/source.html There are indications for debian derivatives (e.g. Mint, Ubuntu) and redhat derivatives, which should cover a large part of the 10 most popular distros. Ciao, Thierry On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 10:08

[sage-devel] Project: LatticeWithIsometry

Dear all, I have written some code (toy implementation) in sage. It could be useful for other people as well. So now I am wondering whether I should make an effort to implement it meeting the sage-devel standards. How good are the chances for such a project to be included in the sage source cod

[sage-devel] Suggestion for main configure script to give package names for Latex.

I'm trying to migrate away from Solaris to Linux, given the takeover by Oracle. I decided to install the latest Debian (8.5 == Jessie) , and Sage. I have not succeeded yet, but some of the issues seem to be ones where the installation could be made easier for popular linux distributions. First con