Nathan does give the link to the original post, but he is quoting out of
context. Here is the full post:
On Sunday, 21 August 2016 07:15:56 UTC+10, William wrote:
> So there is no confusion, my top priority right now is to **make a lot
> of money** by building a profitable company on open sourc
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Vincent Delecroix
<20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The mail of Nathann posted on 24 Aug. 2016 [1], [2] cross posted on
> sage-support and sage-devel did not reach sage-devel. My answer to him did
> not reach sage-devel either.
>
> It was clearly not
The mails seems to have been correctly sent out to subscribers (of
sage-devel). At least a few of us here at SD75 got it. I can't explain
why it's not showing up on the google groups web site.
Best,
Johan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel"
Hello,
The mail of Nathann posted on 24 Aug. 2016 [1], [2] cross posted on
sage-support and sage-devel did not reach sage-devel. My answer to him
did not reach sage-devel either.
It was clearly not spam. Possibly considered as flame (but the thread
was not moved to sage-flame). I would be ha
Hello,
But you are responsible for hiding the rest of the message...
>
With a link toward the full message follows the quote ? You claim that I
hid it is rather bold.
- William's strategy is: making money with SageMath Inc and use this
> money to continue (i.e. after having started Sage) buil
Hi Nathann,
But you are responsible for hiding the rest of the message...
- William's strategy is: making money with SageMath Inc and use this
money to continue (i.e. after having started Sage) building an open
source ecosystem for mathematical computations.
- Not every Sage developer thinks
Quote from William Stein, CEO of SageMath Inc (private for-profit
Delaware company) [1]
So there is no confusion, my top priority right now is to **make a lot
of money** by building a profitable company on open source software
(Latex, Linux, Sage, Octave, R, etc.)
(full post)
On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 at 4:54:45 PM UTC-4, leif wrote:
>
> kcrisman wrote:
> >
> > Make R optional? (Nothing in Sage depends on it, except for the
> > interface to it, including Rpy2.)
> >
> > Gosh, R has been standard for*ever*, practically,
>
> Hört sich nach Schwäbischem D
William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Erik Bray wrote:
>> I think almost any dependency that Sage-the-Python-package can work
>> without should be considered "optional" insofar as installing Sage is
>> concerned. I think it's fine for it to be a stadard part of
>> Sage-the-Dist
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Erik Bray wrote:
> I think almost any dependency that Sage-the-Python-package can work
> without should be considered "optional" insofar as installing Sage is
> concerned. I think it's fine for it to be a stadard part of
> Sage-the-Distribution.
>
> But this gets
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:54 PM, leif wrote:
> kcrisman wrote:
>>
>> Make R optional? (Nothing in Sage depends on it, except for the
>> interface to it, including Rpy2.)
>>
>> Gosh, R has been standard for*ever*, practically,
>
> Hört sich nach Schwäbischem Dreiklang an.
>
>
>> and is of
11 matches
Mail list logo
