The sage4 patchbot spams BuildFailed because of
Fatal error: bliss/graph.hh: No such file or directory
[sagelib-7.4.beta1] #include "bliss/graph.hh"
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receivin
The patchbot server should be up again (it has been moved). Please report
problems here, and please restart (and update) your patchbot clients as
explained in
https://wiki.sagemath.org/buildbot/details
Frederic
Le dimanche 14 août 2016 18:17:12 UTC+2, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> Sin
On 2016-08-19 04:16, James Khan wrote:
Hi!
Many thanks for your message and kind help.
I am running virtual machine on windows 7 and the sage 7.3 link is not
ready yet (the source code is there but not the sage-7.3.ova) so I am
stuck with 7.2 for the time being :(
I have indeed tried ./sage -i
Recently, in ipython5.0 branch of
https://github.com/stakemori/sage-shell-mode, I implemented functions for
some of ANSI sequences.
(sage-shell-mode handles only ^[[nA, ^[[nB, ^[[nC, ^[[nD, ^[[nH and ^[[nJ)
It is not stable enough yet, but it works. I think a similar fix also works
for sage-mod
Hi!
Many thanks for your message and kind help.
I am running virtual machine on windows 7 and the sage 7.3 link is not
ready yet (the source code is there but not the sage-7.3.ova) so I am stuck
with 7.2 for the time being :(
I have indeed tried ./sage -i TOPCOM versus "-i topcom" and then also h
Hi Jeroen,
On 2016-08-18, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2016-08-18 16:43, Simon King wrote:
>> What do you mean by Singular interface?
>
> If I understand correctly, your package has an interface for GAP,
> Singular and Sage and these are all independent from eachother.
In the computation of a coh
Thats a chrome bug thats already fixed upstream...
On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 9:01:04 PM UTC+2, cir...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> When I have a Sage notebook in the browser, as I scroll up or down I
> frequently see the following error on the console:
>
> [1:1:0818/131348:ERROR:PlatformKeyboardE
When I have a Sage notebook in the browser, as I scroll up or down I
frequently see the following error on the console:
[1:1:0818/131348:ERROR:PlatformKeyboardEvent.cpp(117)] Not implemented
reached in static blink::PlatformEvent::Modifiers
blink::PlatformKeyboardEvent::getCurrentModifierState(
On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 5:32:09 AM UTC-7, Bill Page wrote:
>
> I think that there was no claim that it was unambiguous and therefore
> it implies that some ambiguity would be tolerated. But this has
> already been argued ad infinitum and apparently that has resulted in
> the current stal
ExpressionNice is a subclass of sage.symbolic.expression.Expression,
it seemed therefore that maybe I should be able to do something like:
sage: import sage.manifolds.utilities
sage: sage.symbolic.expression.Expression =
sage.manifolds.utilities.ExpressionNice
and expect all my expressions to be
On 2016-08-18 16:43, Simon King wrote:
What do you mean by Singular interface?
If I understand correctly, your package has an interface for GAP,
Singular and Sage and these are all independent from eachother. I am
asking that, if somebody has Singular installed but not GAP and not
Sage, that
James Khan wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thanks a lot for getting back promptly! Sorry it's an old post; I was
> just getting desperate and was googling. :) Would you think updating to
> SAGE 7.3 would help?
I guess it will, at least give better error messages... ;-)
> I don't why TOPCOM is not loading. I
Hi!
Thanks a lot for getting back promptly! Sorry it's an old post; I was just
getting desperate and was googling. :) Would you think updating to SAGE 7.3
would help?
I don't why TOPCOM is not loading. I am running a windows version, maybe
that's a problem?
thanks!!
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:5
Hi Dima,
On 2016-08-18, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Anyway, I guess it depends upon how much GAP code you have. If its hundreds
> of lines it's probably nicer to put them into a file.
It is about 1500 lines, currently in three files.
Cheers,
Simon
--
You received this message because you are sub
Hi Jeroen,
On 2016-08-18, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2016-08-18 11:22, Simon King wrote:
>> What are you talking about? The current optional Sage package "meataxe"
>> is the latest upstream from Aachen.
>
> I was under the impression that you needed special patches and that "the
> latest upstrea
On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 12:59:39 PM UTC+1, Simon King wrote:
>
> Hi Dima,
>
> On 2016-08-18, Dima Pasechnik > wrote:
> >> Does a concept of "GAP packages" and "Singular packages" exist? If so,
> >> you should follow recommendations for those kinds of packages to
> install
> >> your G
On 2016-08-18 11:22, Simon King wrote:
What are you talking about? The current optional Sage package "meataxe"
is the latest upstream from Aachen.
I was under the impression that you needed special patches and that "the
latest upstream from Aachen" did not work for you. Anyway, it doesn't
mat
On 18 August 2016 at 01:59, Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 at 3:25:31 PM UTC-7, Bill Page wrote:
>>
>>
>> It turns out that a solution is now "hidden away" in plain sight:
>>
>> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18640
>>
>> http://sagemanifolds.obspm.fr/doc/18640/reference/manifo
Am Donnerstag, 18. August 2016 13:33:41 UTC+2 schrieb Volker Braun:
>
> PS: It would be easy enough to expose the simple-prompt either to the sage
> command line or have a special sage-embedded commandline entrypoint that
> starts witout any ANSI sequences.
>
> I have absolutely no idea how to
Hi Dima,
On 2016-08-18, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> Does a concept of "GAP packages" and "Singular packages" exist? If so,
>> you should follow recommendations for those kinds of packages to install
>> your GAP/Singular code.
>
> With GAP it is problematic, as updating GAP wipes out installed GAP
James Khan wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thanks for pointing this out. I am having the same problems!
>
> I have the most recent version of SAGE (7.2)
FWIW, the most recent version is Sage 7.3, released a couple of days ago.
There have been changes also to the topcom package IIRC, although the
error you get
PS: It would be easy enough to expose the simple-prompt either to the sage
command line or have a special sage-embedded commandline entrypoint that
starts witout any ANSI sequences.
On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 1:32:18 PM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> IMHO this is an intentional upstream ch
IMHO this is an intentional upstream change and not a bug. So we'll have to
either go with it or fork our own IPython. And I don't want to maintain an
IPython fork.
On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 11:08:41 AM UTC+2, Martin R wrote:
>
> Since solving this appears to be tricky, is there a way to
On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 7:37:28 AM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2016-08-18 00:02, Simon King wrote:
> > Slightly elaborating on my suggestion: Split the code from the old-style
> > p_group_cohomology-2.1.6.spkg into four parts, namely
> > 1. an optional package "meataxe", which
Hi Jeroen,
On 2016-08-18, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2016-08-18 00:02, Simon King wrote:
>> Slightly elaborating on my suggestion: Split the code from the old-style
>> p_group_cohomology-2.1.6.spkg into four parts, namely
>> 1. an optional package "meataxe", which provides a C library and some
>>
Since solving this appears to be tricky, is there a way to undo the
ipython-5 thing? (I'd like to keep other things from sage 7.4...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it
now building...
Am Mittwoch, 17. August 2016 20:38:12 UTC+2 schrieb Volker Braun:
>
> I made https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21269
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 at 10:04:47 AM UTC+2, Martin R wrote:
>>
>> While working on the new fricas interface, I noticed that the
>> method __repr__ in
Hi!
Thanks for pointing this out. I am having the same problems!
I have the most recent version of SAGE (7.2)
and I have tried all the combinations suggested in this thread: TOPCOM,
topcom, download the bz2 and plaving in /upstream/ but still no luck. I
wonder why this is the case.
I get the
28 matches
Mail list logo
