> On Aug 14, 2016, at 11:28 AM, Johan S. H. Rosenkilde
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On my machine, Ivan's workaround also does not help: I get exactly the
> same behaviour as Martin R. I run Emacs 24.5.1 on Arch Linux 4.6.3-1,
> x86_64.
>
> See also this depressing post on Emacs Stack Exchange:
> htt
Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
> For the record, I am that reviewer.
>
> > As a huge part of Arpit Merchant's GSoC project on Gabidulin codes,
> > we've been working on Xavier Caruso's old patch implementing skew
> > polynomial rings, #13215.
> >
> > While everyone involved has consid
Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
>> On Aug 14, 2016, at 14:06 , Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> You need the newest git-trac version, presumably you checked out the repo
>> somewhere. Find it and run "git pull (in the git-trac repo folder)
>
> Thanks for that; the updated git-trac did better. Then I ran in
For the record, I am that reviewer.
> As a huge part of Arpit Merchant's GSoC project on Gabidulin codes,
> > we've been working on Xavier Caruso's old patch implementing skew
> > polynomial rings, #13215.
> >
> > While everyone involved has considered the code and math carefully, it
> > is m
> On Aug 14, 2016, at 14:06 , Volker Braun wrote:
>
> You need the newest git-trac version, presumably you checked out the repo
> somewhere. Find it and run "git pull (in the git-trac repo folder)
Thanks for that; the updated git-trac did better. Then I ran into this, which
perhaps has to do
You need the newest git-trac version, presumably you checked out the repo
somewhere. Find it and run "git pull (in the git-trac repo folder)
On Sunday, August 14, 2016 at 10:51:36 PM UTC+2, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 14, 2016, at 13:44 , Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Sunda
On Aug 14, 2016, at 13:44 , Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, August 14, 2016 at 9:17:27 PM UTC+1, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>>
>> Hi, all,
>>
>> I admit to being a total novice in the New World of Sage development
>> (post-git).
>>
> post-git??? Hopefully not...
Well, yeah; post-git-
On Sunday, August 14, 2016 at 9:17:27 PM UTC+1, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
> Hi, all,
>
> I admit to being a total novice in the New World of Sage development
> (post-git).
>
post-git??? Hopefully not...
You know how to use git, right? Then:
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/manual_git
Hi, all,
I admit to being a total novice in the New World of Sage development (post-git).
Using OS X, 10.11.6, I attempted just now to “git” the code from a trac ticket
(which has every indication of being more-or-less up-to-date, git-wise), and
got this in response (on a freshly-built 7.3):
%
you got me: I was including $SAGE_ROOT/src/build/
now the numbers agree
S.
* leif [2016-08-14 16:55:23]:
> leif wrote:
> > VulK wrote:
> >> Really weird, his is what I have:
> >>
> >> $ cd $SAGE_ROOT/src
> >> $ grep __cmp__ **/*.py* | grep def | wc
> >> 6242538 48212
> >> $ grep __cm
Johan S. H. Rosenkilde wrote:
> Hi sage-devel,
>
> As a huge part of Arpit Merchant's GSoC project on Gabidulin codes,
> we've been working on Xavier Caruso's old patch implementing skew
> polynomial rings, #13215.
>
> While everyone involved has considered the code and math carefully, it
> is my
On 2016-08-14 14:41, Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
Otherwise, one will have to get rid /by hand/ of all the `__cmp__`
methods everywhere, that will become obsolete in python3.
Don't confuse the cmp() function with __cmp__() methods! Getting rid of
cmp() and getting rid of __cmp__() are a priori dif
Hi,
On my machine, Ivan's workaround also does not help: I get exactly the
same behaviour as Martin R. I run Emacs 24.5.1 on Arch Linux 4.6.3-1,
x86_64.
See also this depressing post on Emacs Stack Exchange:
http://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/24453/weird-shell-output-when-using-ipython-5
I
I tried
%config SageTerminalInteractiveShell.simple_prompt=True
in a running session inside Emacs, but it didn’t help. Perhaps it has to be
done at the command line?
-Ivan
> On Aug 14, 2016, at 1:54 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Ipython 5 has now a comman-line switch "ipython --simple-prompt"
Hi sage-devel,
As a huge part of Arpit Merchant's GSoC project on Gabidulin codes,
we've been working on Xavier Caruso's old patch implementing skew
polynomial rings, #13215.
While everyone involved has considered the code and math carefully, it
is my opinion that the design could still be subjec
Happy to hear that you care about the patchbot. Maintenance is currently
being done (slowly). It will hopefully be resurrected soon.
Frédéric
Le dimanche 14 août 2016 18:17:12 UTC+2, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> Since yesterday (at least), it seems that patchbot.sagemath.org is
> unre
Hi,
Since yesterday (at least), it seems that patchbot.sagemath.org is
unreachable.
Eric.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr..
Hi,
Thanks for the advice. At some point I'd hope to do something along the
lines
discussed in this thread.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-devel/9lHpGgG3nsI
But more and more I'm figuring out those plans are going to have to be
longer term than I initially, perhaps naively, th
IMHO you could just as well use plain git (unless you need to deal with
heaps of Sage trac tickets or are not comfortable using git in general...)
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/manual_git.html#git-the-hard-way
On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 5:07:06 PM UTC+1, Bill Page wrote:
>
> It
On Aug 14, 2016 11:26 AM, "'Martin R' via sage-devel" <
sage-devel@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
> Can't we undo the ipython 5 thing? It's a major nuisance on the command
line, too.
>
+1
I find the new coloration in the Sage command line in the beta release
quite extreme and nearly unreadable in so
at least on my other computer, running
GNU Emacs 24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.14.9) of 2015-03-21
on kissel, modified by Debian
this does not help. However, on this computer I don't even get to the
(weird) sage prompt, unless I hit C-g. I evaluated the two definitions you
sen
Hi,
I was trying to get a sage server running on a computer at work and I kept
finding that it would not connect. I then started debugging and ran into
further issues.
When I execute the documentation
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/notebook/sagenb/notebook/notebook_object.html
(bo
leif wrote:
> VulK wrote:
>> Really weird, his is what I have:
>>
>> $ cd $SAGE_ROOT/src
>> $ grep __cmp__ **/*.py* | grep def | wc
>> 6242538 48212
>> $ grep __cmp__ **/*.py* | wc
>> 9154020 76837
>>
>> (I am running zsh so **/*.py* is expanded to any file under $SAGE_ROOT/src
VulK wrote:
> Really weird, his is what I have:
>
> $ cd $SAGE_ROOT/src
> $ grep __cmp__ **/*.py* | grep def | wc
> 6242538 48212
> $ grep __cmp__ **/*.py* | wc
> 9154020 76837
>
> (I am running zsh so **/*.py* is expanded to any file under $SAGE_ROOT/src
> whose extension be
Really weird, his is what I have:
$ cd $SAGE_ROOT/src
$ grep __cmp__ **/*.py* | grep def | wc
6242538 48212
$ grep __cmp__ **/*.py* | wc
9154020 76837
(I am running zsh so **/*.py* is expanded to any file under $SAGE_ROOT/src
whose extension begin by py)
S.
* leif [2016-08-
leif wrote:
> VulK wrote:
>> Getting rid of __cmp__ would be the cleaner way but a simple grep on
>> $SAGE_ROOT/src gives 915 occurrences of __cmp__, 624 of which are
>> definitions.
? I'm getting 339 definitions in 249 files. (That's for 7.3.beta9, but
shouldn't differ that much.)
-leif
>> I
VulK wrote:
> Getting rid of __cmp__ would be the cleaner way but a simple grep on
> $SAGE_ROOT/src gives 915 occurrences of __cmp__, 624 of which are
> definitions. Is there any way we can automate the process?
> S.
I have to admit I fail to see the problem (perhaps Frédéric could
elaborate a bit
Getting rid of __cmp__ would be the cleaner way but a simple grep on
$SAGE_ROOT/src gives 915 occurrences of __cmp__, 624 of which are
definitions. Is there any way we can automate the process?
S.
* Frédéric Chapoton [2016-08-14 05:41:01]:
>As an intermediate step in our long way to python3
As an intermediate step in our long way to python3, I would like to be able
to compile all the .pyx files in py3.
Except for #21246 (please review), the big remaining problem preventing to
reach this goal is the removal of the builtin "cmp" in py3.
One solution would be to have our own "cmp" th
Ivan Andrus wrote:
> It looks like ipython is printing invalid (or at least unknown to Emacs)
>
> I got it to ignore them by setting
>
> (setq ansi-color-drop-regexp
> "
> \\[\\([ABCDsuK]\\|[12][JK]\\|=[0-9]+[hI]\\|[0-9;]*[HfDnC]\\|\\?[0-9]+[hl]\\|J\\
> )")
>
> There is also a bug in my v
Ipython 5 has now a comman-line switch "ipython --simple-prompt" that
disables all escape sequences, but also disables prompt customizations. So
instead of sage: its then always In[] / Out[]. I didn't find a way to turn
of all ansi sequences while still changing the prompt to "sage:".
On Sun
31 matches
Mail list logo
