[sage-devel] Re: Current best practice for LaTeX of function names

2016-06-26 Thread Ralf Stephan
In Pynac: REGISTER_FUNCTION(beta, eval_func(beta_eval). evalf_func(beta_evalf). derivative_func(beta_deriv). series_func(beta_series). latex_name("{\\rm B}"). set_symmetry(sy_sym

Re: [sage-devel] Sage packages for GAP packages

2016-06-26 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
Thank you both for your answers. I think what I will do for now is add QuaGroup to gap_packages, which I think will be the easiest thing for me to implement the interface I want, and liealgdb to database_gap. I will also add François's instructions to the top-level Sage doc for the trivial to i

[sage-devel] Re: Current best practice for LaTeX of function names

2016-06-26 Thread Paul Masson
Hey Ralf, I'm trying to understand this behavior: sage: latex(beta(x,x)) {\rm B}\left(x, x\right) Since there are currently no LaTeX definitions of any sort for the beta function, where is the capital "B" coming from? It's a minor question but it's bugging me. Thanks. On Wednesday, June 15, 2

Re: [sage-devel] Re: consistency in trac e-mails

2016-06-26 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 06/26/2016 05:55 PM, François Bissey wrote: > On 06/27/16 09:50, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> could you check sage-trac@googlegroups for these "missing" emails? > > Didn't think about that. I don't remember seeing the tickets in the > digest. But they are there. > The SPF record for sagemath.org

Re: [sage-devel] Re: consistency in trac e-mails

2016-06-26 Thread François Bissey
On 06/27/16 09:50, Dima Pasechnik wrote: could you check sage-trac@googlegroups for these "missing" emails? Didn't think about that. I don't remember seeing the tickets in the digest. But they are there. Francois -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [sage-devel] Re: consistency in trac e-mails

2016-06-26 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sunday, June 26, 2016 at 10:19:38 PM UTC+1, François wrote: > > On 06/27/16 03:34, leif wrote: > > Vincent Delecroix wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> Thanks for the hard work for the infrastructure transition! > >> > >> As a consequence of the new trac infrastructure, my e-mail reader > >>

[sage-devel] Re: Cup product over integers

2016-06-26 Thread John H Palmieri
Oh, of course there are probably other algorithms available, but this is the one I knew about off the top of my head... On Sunday, June 26, 2016 at 1:03:17 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote: > > Yes, it is correct that we can only compute cup products over fields. It > is possible to do over the i

Re: [sage-devel] Re: consistency in trac e-mails

2016-06-26 Thread François Bissey
On 06/27/16 03:34, leif wrote: Vincent Delecroix wrote: Hello, Thanks for the hard work for the infrastructure transition! As a consequence of the new trac infrastructure, my e-mail reader (thunderbird) is not able to group the e-mails by thread. Works for me. There was some temporary fallo

[sage-devel] Re: Cup product over integers

2016-06-26 Thread John H Palmieri
Yes, it is correct that we can only compute cup products over fields. It is possible to do over the integers but hasn't been implemented in Sage yet. See P. Pilarczyk and P. Réal, *Computation of cubical homology, cohomology, and (co)homological operations via chain contraction*, Adv. Compu

Re: [sage-devel] Re: wiki.sagemath.org

2016-06-26 Thread John Cremona
On 26 June 2016 at 19:56, saad khalid wrote: > At the top of the page it says > "No jsMath TeX fonts found -- using image fonts instead. > These may be slow and might not print well. > Use the jsMath control panel to get additional information." > > I wasn't sure if this was just my browser(I'm ru

[sage-devel] Re: sage fails to build on (fresh install of) debian linux 8.4 (64 bit)...

2016-06-26 Thread Joseph Hundley
Ah. Then I think we can say with reasonable certainty that there was nothing in $SAGE_ROOT/logs/pkgs/jmol-*.log before today, because when I looked the first time today, there was only Found local metadata for jmol-14.2.11_2015.01.20 Attempting to download package jmol-14.2.11_2015.01.20.t

[sage-devel] Re: wiki.sagemath.org

2016-06-26 Thread saad khalid
At the top of the page it says "*No jsMath TeX fonts found* -- using image fonts instead. These may be slow and might not print well. Use the jsMath control panel to get additional information." I wasn't sure if this was just my browser(I'm running firefox) or if it was supposed to be like that

[sage-devel] Re: sage fails to build on (fresh install of) debian linux 8.4 (64 bit)...

2016-06-26 Thread leif
Joseph Hundley wrote: > Running ./sage -i jmol fixes the problem of "point3d((0,0,0))" producing > a message about a Jmol viewer being launched but no actual Jmol > viewer. And fixing jmol fixes the problem with building dochtml. > > Thanks! > > I went to check $SAGE_ROOT/logs/pkgs/jmol-*.log

[sage-devel] Cup product over integers

2016-06-26 Thread Volker Braun
It seems that we currently can't compute cup products in cohomology over the integers, only over fields. Is that correct? Is there a ticket to extend it over the integers? Surely that's an interesting question, isn't it? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage fails to build on (fresh install of) debian linux 8.4 (64 bit)...

2016-06-26 Thread Joseph Hundley
Running ./sage -i jmol fixes the problem of "point3d((0,0,0))" producing a message about a Jmol viewer being launched but no actual Jmol viewer. And fixing jmol fixes the problem with building dochtml. Thanks! I went to check $SAGE_ROOT/logs/pkgs/jmol-*.log after issuing the ./sage -i jmol

[sage-devel] wiki.sagemath.org

2016-06-26 Thread William Stein
Hi, https://wiki.sagemath.org is now running on GCE, very nicely configured using Docker. Please report issues. -- William -- William (http://wstein.org) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

[sage-devel] Re: consistency in trac e-mails

2016-06-26 Thread leif
Vincent Delecroix wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks for the hard work for the infrastructure transition! > > As a consequence of the new trac infrastructure, my e-mail reader > (thunderbird) is not able to group the e-mails by thread. Works for me. There was some temporary fallout due to the switch to

[sage-devel] Re: Trac Authentication error

2016-06-26 Thread Volker Braun
Then your password is just incorrect. Try it at https://trac.sagemath.org/login/xmlrpc On Sunday, June 26, 2016 at 12:12:30 PM UTC+2, jhonrubia6 wrote: > > Volker, I checked that, same error. I also tested the authentication with > > OnoSendaiII:sage J_Honrubia$ ssh g...@trac.sagemath.org inf

Re: [sage-devel] Sage packages for GAP packages

2016-06-26 Thread Dima Pasechnik
There are few GAP packages, one of them io, which need GAP kernel extensions built (which are some kind of shared libraries). I am not sure whether this works with users building GAP extensions for a systemwide GAP install. Dima -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go

[sage-devel] Re: Trac Authentication error

2016-06-26 Thread jhonrubia6
Volker, I checked that, same error. I also tested the authentication with OnoSendaiII:sage J_Honrubia$ ssh g...@trac.sagemath.org info hello jhonrubia6, this is git@trac running gitolite3 3.5.3.1-2 (Debian) on git 1.9.1 R Wsage So the authentication seems ok. There must be something w

[sage-devel] consistency in trac e-mails

2016-06-26 Thread Vincent Delecroix
Hello, Thanks for the hard work for the infrastructure transition! As a consequence of the new trac infrastructure, my e-mail reader (thunderbird) is not able to group the e-mails by thread. Moreover, some of the e-mails got a reply-to (t...@sagemath.org) and some others not. Is there some mi

Re: [sage-devel] Sage packages for GAP packages

2016-06-26 Thread Francois Bissey
> On 26/06/2016, at 17:22, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > > The only method I know to add GAP packages is here: > https://wiki.sagemath.org/InstallingGapPackages. So at the very least, I > would like to see an "official" policy and instructions (i.e., in the main > documentation). I see. This

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage fails to build on (fresh install of) debian linux 8.4 (64 bit)...

2016-06-26 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sunday, June 26, 2016 at 8:21:16 AM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Sunday, June 26, 2016 at 2:48:26 AM UTC+1, Joseph Hundley wrote: >> >> Was this ever resolved? >> I seem to be having the same problem trying to build on both a Mac and a >> recent install of elementary OS. >> >> C

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage fails to build on (fresh install of) debian linux 8.4 (64 bit)...

2016-06-26 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sunday, June 26, 2016 at 2:48:26 AM UTC+1, Joseph Hundley wrote: > > Was this ever resolved? > I seem to be having the same problem trying to build on both a Mac and a > recent install of elementary OS. > > Certainly there is recent Java on this machine. Other Java programs run > fine. >