Re: [sage-devel] Developing sage-based code out of tree

2016-06-06 Thread Erik Bray
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 5:25 AM, William Stein wrote: > We had tons of discussion on sage-devel about exactly this topic > recently. One thing is that Chris made > > https://github.com/cswiercz/sage_packages > > but that seems to have gone nowhere. > > I think that **all** development of Sage sho

Re: [sage-devel] Using the systemwide R (or upgrading it internally)

2016-06-06 Thread François Bissey
On 06/07/16 07:28, Jack Dyson wrote: Hi everyone, I'd appreciate some help on this: I need to use mixtools on R in sage for the ER stuff they have. It turns out you need R 3.2.4 or better. I thought of (a) upgrading the sage internal R or (b) using the system wide one that I have on sagemath 7.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SageMath 7.3.beta3 build failure on OS X versions 10.8 and 10.9.

2016-06-06 Thread François Bissey
Yes that's new. Although it is disabled for fat binaries, but there is no easy way to disable it from outside spkg-install. Francois On 06/07/16 08:08, Nathan Dunfield wrote: I have successfully compiled Sage 7.2, which has an earlier version of NTL, from source on both 10.8 and 10.9.

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath 7.3.beta3 build failure on OS X versions 10.8 and 10.9.

2016-06-06 Thread Nathan Dunfield
> > I have successfully compiled Sage 7.2, which has an earlier version of > NTL, from source on both 10.8 and 10.9. > Checking the logs for my Sage 7.2 builds, the old NTL version 9.6.2 spkg did *not* specify the "-march=native" flag on 10.8 and 10.9, unlike the current spkg for 9.8.1. Nath

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath 7.3.beta3 build failure on OS X versions 10.8 and 10.9.

2016-06-06 Thread Nathan Dunfield
> > Did you compile sage yourself on the same machine on which you are trying > to update the NTL package or are using a binary distribution built on >10.9 > ? > I was doing a clean Sage build from scratch against the git commit (715566f4bf9) corresponding to 7.3.beta3. I have successfully co

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath 7.3.beta3 build failure on OS X versions 10.8 and 10.9.

2016-06-06 Thread Matthias Goerner
Did you compile sage yourself on the same machine on which you are trying to update the NTL package or are using a binary distribution built on >10.9 ? In the latter case, I am pretty sure it is a different manifestation of the problem from http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20563 On Sunday, June

[sage-devel] Using the systemwide R (or upgrading it internally)

2016-06-06 Thread Jack Dyson
Hi everyone, I'd appreciate some help on this: I need to use mixtools on R in sage for the ER stuff they have. It turns out you need R 3.2.4 or better. I thought of (a) upgrading the sage internal R or (b) using the system wide one that I have on sagemath 7.2, passing data back and forth from s

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread Clement Pernet
Le 06/06/2016 17:17, Ralf Stephan a écrit : > On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 4:22:02 PM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > Or perhaps someone pulled a full private copy recently? > > > Around end of April, I think, someone better? > > ralf@ark:~/sage/.git> find logs/refs/remotes/trac/| wc > 723

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread mmarco
> > I will setup SSL once the > domain name is correct (not before tomorrow). > > > Will you need the old certificate or plan to generate a new one? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop rece

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath 7.3.beta3 build failure on OS X versions 10.8 and 10.9.

2016-06-06 Thread paulmasson
I can confirm Sage 7.3.beta3 builds on OS X 10.11 (El Capitan) On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 6:47:29 PM UTC-7, Nathan Dunfield wrote: > > On OS X versions 10.8 (Mountain Lion) and 10.9 (Mavricks), the recently > updated NTL package fails to build with the following error (complete log > also attach

Re: [sage-devel] anyone with a recent full git trac.sagemath tree, please step forward

2016-06-06 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2016-06-06 17:48, Dima Pasechnik wrote: I don't know how to create a working repo from .git/ alone... Just checkout something and then "git reset --hard" works. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group a

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > > Le lundi 6 juin 2016 19:08:44 UTC+2, Thierry (sage-googlesucks@xxx) a écrit > : >> >> Hi, >> >> the wiki is back online at University Paris North : >> http://sagewiki.lipn.univ-paris13.fr/ >> > > Thank you very much Thierry! Thank you!

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
Le lundi 6 juin 2016 19:08:44 UTC+2, Thierry (sage-googlesucks@xxx) a écrit : > > Hi, > > the wiki is back online at University Paris North : > http://sagewiki.lipn.univ-paris13.fr/ > > Thank you very much Thierry! I've checked it on recently modified pages: the Sage Days 74 ones. Everything i

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Please someone switch the DNS to point to the resurrected sage wiki. (cc-ing Harald in case he can do it). Thanks Thierry! Samuel Le lundi 6 juin 2016 19:08:44 UTC+2, Thierry (sage-googlesucks@xxx) a écrit : > > Hi, > > the wiki is back online at University Paris North : > http://sagewiki.lip

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread Thierry
Hi, the wiki is back online at University Paris North : http://sagewiki.lipn.univ-paris13.fr/ It should work with wiki.sagemath.org domain name so please do not hesitate to switch the DNS to 194.254.163.84. I will setup SSL once the domain name is correct (not before tomorrow). Once the data wil

Re: [sage-devel] anyone with a recent full git trac.sagemath tree, please step forward

2016-06-06 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 4:13:43 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2016-06-06 16:44, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > And put it somewhere public, e.g. on github. > > I have simply tarred up my .git directory at > > http://sage.ugent.be/www/jdemeyer/sagetrac-git.tar.bz2 > I copied it to GCE

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread Volker Braun
IMHO thats not a big deal, some orgs are experimenting with permanently running datacenters at 90+F... The best course of action is probably to wait and get the machines back up. Then slowly move the infrastructure out of UW. On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 11:27:39 AM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote:

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 3:57:41 PM UTC+1, William wrote: > > Hello, > > The sysadmin just explained what happened -- namely the room has been > cooking all weekend due to an AC failure: This means that everything > might -- or might not -- come back in the next few days. There is no > way

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread Ralf Stephan
On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 4:22:02 PM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Or perhaps someone pulled a full private copy recently? > Around end of April, I think, someone better? ralf@ark:~/sage/.git> find logs/refs/remotes/trac/| wc 72317231 368968 -- You received this message because you a

Re: [sage-devel] Developing sage-based code out of tree

2016-06-06 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2016-06-06 17:06, William Stein wrote: And yet you can do anything you want in setup.py... It's not hard to get around that.q First of all, those hacks will most likely break setup.py in one way or another. For example, they might break wheel or "setup.py dist" or whatever. Second, why sh

Re: [sage-devel] anyone with a recent full git trac.sagemath tree, please step forward

2016-06-06 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2016-06-06 16:44, Dima Pasechnik wrote: And put it somewhere public, e.g. on github. I have simply tarred up my .git directory at http://sage.ugent.be/www/jdemeyer/sagetrac-git.tar.bz2 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsu

Re: [sage-devel] Developing sage-based code out of tree

2016-06-06 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2016-06-06 16:05, William Stein wrote: >> >> Isn't there one canonical one to use now? > > > I guess the "canonical" one is setuptools. But setuptools makes the annoying > assumption that a Python package is completely self-contained and

Re: [sage-devel] anyone with a recent full git trac.sagemath tree, please step forward

2016-06-06 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2016-06-06 16:44, Dima Pasechnik wrote: And put it somewhere public, e.g. on github. I don't think I can push 6930 branches to github. After a while, I get this error: error: failed to push some refs to 'https://github.com/jdemeyer/sage.git' error: git-remote-https died of signal 13 -- Y

Re: [sage-devel] Developing sage-based code out of tree

2016-06-06 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2016-06-06 16:05, William Stein wrote: Isn't there one canonical one to use now? I guess the "canonical" one is setuptools. But setuptools makes the annoying assumption that a Python package is completely self-contained and that no other software ever needs to use files from that Python p

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread William Stein
Hello, The sysadmin just explained what happened -- namely the room has been cooking all weekend due to an AC failure: This means that everything might -- or might not -- come back in the next few days. There is no way to know the extent of the damage, if any. --- "The PDL C28 server room AC un

Re: [sage-devel] anyone with a recent full git trac.sagemath tree, please step forward

2016-06-06 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2016-06-06 16:44, Dima Pasechnik wrote: And put it somewhere public, e.g. on github. git fetch trac --all (or perhaps even just 'git fetch trac' would have produced a full backup) I did "git fetch trac" after the Sage 7.3.beta3 upgrade, so very recently. -- You received this message becaus

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 3:30:55 PM UTC+1, Frédéric Chapoton wrote: > > I do not think that the patchbots clients have a copy of the full git > repo. They only pull branches. But they have the branch for 7.3.beta3, at > least. > this one is just here: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/tree/deve

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread 'Bill Hart' via sage-devel
It's a devastating blow. But we will rebuild. https://imgflip.com/i/15dnsh On Monday, 6 June 2016 16:32:12 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > Also flint/mpir/nemo sites are down (flint people know this), due to being > on the same cluster of machines... > > On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 3:22:02 PM UT

[sage-devel] anyone with a recent full git trac.sagemath tree, please step forward

2016-06-06 Thread Dima Pasechnik
And put it somewhere public, e.g. on github. git fetch trac --all (or perhaps even just 'git fetch trac' would have produced a full backup) (please excuse my ignorance, I don't know how to make such a recovery repo quickly - but first we need to find the data...) Dima -- You received this me

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Also flint/mpir/nemo sites are down (flint people know this), due to being on the same cluster of machines... On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 3:22:02 PM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 2:18:36 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> >> On 2016-06-06 13:09, Thierry wrote: >>

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread Frédéric Chapoton
I do not think that the patchbots clients have a copy of the full git repo. They only pull branches. But they have the branch for 7.3.beta3, at least. Frederic Le lundi 6 juin 2016 16:22:02 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > > > On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 2:18:36 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 2:18:36 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2016-06-06 13:09, Thierry wrote: > > For the git/trac, i am not sure that it is a good idea to put a 2-weeks > > backup read/write, because it will be awful to merge with the current > > state. It is imho much better to

Re: [sage-devel] Developing sage-based code out of tree

2016-06-06 Thread William Stein
On Monday, June 6, 2016, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2016-06-06 05:25, William Stein wrote: > >> I think that **all** development of Sage should be done using standard >> Python packaging.Of course Cython is very well supported using >> setuptools >> > > or distutils if you prefer that. Isn'

Re: [sage-devel] Developing sage-based code out of tree

2016-06-06 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2016-06-06 05:25, William Stein wrote: I think that **all** development of Sage should be done using standard Python packaging.Of course Cython is very well supported using setuptools or distutils if you prefer that. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Trac and wiki

2016-06-06 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > The buildbot is gone, too. > > I'm also travelling this week and don't have much time to do anything... > > Especially for trac with our custom plugins I'd really prefer a docker > container with a working Dockerfile than a random VM that has b

[sage-devel] Re: Trac and wiki

2016-06-06 Thread Volker Braun
The buildbot is gone, too. I'm also travelling this week and don't have much time to do anything... Especially for trac with our custom plugins I'd really prefer a docker container with a working Dockerfile than a random VM that has been prodded by dozens of people over the course of years.

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread Frédéric Chapoton
http://patchbot.sagemath.org/ is now also affected, even if it was working at some point after trac's failure. Frédéric Le lundi 6 juin 2016 14:48:47 UTC+2, William a écrit : > > I've sent invites to the Google compute engine project to the following > people. > > - Andrew O > - Dima P >

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread Thierry
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:18:33PM +0200, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2016-06-06 13:09, Thierry wrote: > >For the git/trac, i am not sure that it is a good idea to put a 2-weeks > >backup read/write, because it will be awful to merge with the current > >state. It is imho much better to have some dow

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread Ralf Stephan
On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 2:48:47 PM UTC+2, William wrote: > > I've sent invites to the Google compute engine project to the following > people. > How do people coordinate usually in this setting? Mail cc? chat? group? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2016-06-06 13:09, Thierry wrote: For the git/trac, i am not sure that it is a good idea to put a 2-weeks backup read/write, because it will be awful to merge with the current state. It is imho much better to have some downtime since people can still work on their local branch. Sure, but the

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread Thierry
Hi, i am currently working on the wiki (my backup is <2days so there is almost no lose, and it will be easy to merge the very few changes once we can access the current sate). For the git/trac, i am not sure that it is a good idea to put a 2-weeks backup read/write, because it will be awful to me

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread William Stein
and Ralf Stephan. NOTE: the backups are in /orig on each machine. On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 8:48 AM, William Stein wrote: > I've sent invites to the Google compute engine project to the following > people. > > - Andrew O > - Dima P > - Volker B > - Erik B > - Samuel L > > On Mon, Jun 6

Re: [sage-devel] Trac and wiki

2016-06-06 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Erik Bray wrote: > On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 7:27 PM, William Stein wrote: >> Hi sage devel, >> >> According to my monitors trac and wiki are down. I have no idea why. I'm >> boarding a plane out of town now... > > I thought that the Trac site was hosted on Google--

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread William Stein
I've sent invites to the Google compute engine project to the following people. - Andrew O - Dima P - Volker B - Erik B - Samuel L On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2016-06-06 10:33, Erik Bray wrote: >> >> I think one of the best things about Sage's development

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath 7.3.beta3 build failure on OS X versions 10.8 and 10.9.

2016-06-06 Thread Nathan Dunfield
On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 11:49:55 PM UTC-5, leif wrote: > > Well, GCC accepting '-march=native' doesn't imply the dumb Apple > assembler accepts all the instructions (here AVX) GCC then emits... > If you pass gcc the flag "-Wa,-q", then it will use clang's assembler rather than the ancient ve

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread mmarco
Would it be technically possible to host all these services in different physical locations (syncronized, of course), and use some kind of load balancer to handle the falldown of one of them? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To un

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2016-06-06 10:33, Erik Bray wrote: I think one of the best things about Sage's development is that it's using Trac. GitHub's issue tracker is awful by comparison, especially for the volume of issues Sage generates. I agree. 3. Configure trac.sagemath.org and wiki.sagemath.org so they work

Re: [sage-devel] PEP idea: unary division

2016-06-06 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2016-06-06 10:39, Erik Bray wrote: But then you have to deal with the usual mess of ensuring that the __rdiv__ method handles division for those objects. FYI: __rdiv__ does not exist in Cython (__div__ is always used), so there is not so much mess. -- You received this message because you

Re: [sage-devel] Trac and wiki

2016-06-06 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 9:29:58 AM UTC+1, Erik Bray wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 7:27 PM, William Stein > wrote: > > Hi sage devel, > > > > According to my monitors trac and wiki are down. I have no idea why. > I'm > > boarding a plane out of town now... > > I thought that the Tr

[sage-devel] Re: sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 7:03:42 AM UTC+1, Ralf Stephan wrote: > > On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 5:10:16 AM UTC+2, William wrote: >> >> There is also a wiki here https://github.com/sagemath/sage/wiki >> At some point migrate the data on wiki.sagemath.org to github (maybe >> remove all images if

Re: [sage-devel] PEP idea: unary division

2016-06-06 Thread Erik Bray
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2016-06-02 15:52, Erik Bray wrote: >> 2. I know this is probably anathema to mathematicians, but couldn't >> "1/" be viewed as a two character unary operator meaning reciprocal? >> :) > > > Sort of, but keep in mind efficiency. Often, taki

Re: [sage-devel] sage infrastructure at UW

2016-06-06 Thread Erik Bray
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 5:09 AM, William Stein wrote: > Hi, > > Yesterday a machine at UW (the one hosting *.sagenb.org) was attacking > other computers, so the UW shut it down. > Today trac, the wiki, and many other machines crashed. > > I'm traveling, so can't look into the hardware anytime soon.

Re: [sage-devel] Trac and wiki

2016-06-06 Thread Erik Bray
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 7:27 PM, William Stein wrote: > Hi sage devel, > > According to my monitors trac and wiki are down. I have no idea why. I'm > boarding a plane out of town now... I thought that the Trac site was hosted on Google--at least, that was the impression Samuel got when he brough

[sage-devel] Re: Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

2016-06-06 Thread Peter Luschny
--- ImportError Traceback (most recent call last) in () > 1 load('http://') 2 load('http://') 3 /home/sc_serv/sage/src/sage/structure/sage_object.pyx in sage.structure.s