Hi Grayson,
I'm really looking forward to your GSoC on curves!
> Currently, the plane curve classes do not inherit from the space curve
> ...
> It seems that it would be a lot clearer to have a different naming
> scheme, such as having ProjectiveCurve_generic be called
> ProjectiveCurve_plane, a
Hi all,
I am working on revising the class structure for generic curves to make it
easier to implement functionality for the GSoC 2016 project on algebraic
curves. The main curve classes right now are ProjectiveSpaceCurve_generic,
ProjectiveCurve_generic, AffineSpaceCurve_generic, and AffineCur
On Thursday, 26 May 2016 10:34:10 UTC-6, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
> Please report any new (or old) errors that you notice - I will try to
>> fix them tomorrow (Saturday) afternoon (MST) and on Sunday/Monday. If
>> something is horribly wrong and I can't resolve it by Monday evening,
>> I'll pull back
It means that our trac plugin had problems mergin in the lastest beta. You
should try to merge yourself, and see if there are any conflicts. If there
are conflicts: resolve and push. Its possible that manual merge succeeds
because the git commandline client is better at merging, in that case you
I noticed some typos on #10180 so I prepared a patch and committed, but now
I see the branch in red in trac ticketing system and an error "trac's auto
merging failed"
maybe the ticket was already closed even if the status was needs_review ,
I do not understand this error, nor how to solve it.
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:22 AM, rjf wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, May 27, 2016 at 10:34:38 AM UTC-7, William wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:30 AM, rjf wrote:
>> > So you should claim authorship and copyright, and then declare that
>> > others
>> > may
>> > use it under whatever restrictions
On Friday, May 27, 2016 at 10:34:38 AM UTC-7, William wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:30 AM, rjf >
> wrote:
> > So you should claim authorship and copyright, and then declare that
> others
> > may
> > use it under whatever restrictions you determine. Personally, I find
> the
> > MIT
probably Jmol problem is Java-related, i.e. it perhaps needs a different
version of Java, or at least some working Java version.
On Sunday, May 29, 2016 at 6:17:46 AM UTC+1, Eric Larson wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Yes, sage mostly works --- except I cannot create a 3D graphics object:
>
> sage: point
