[sage-devel] Re: Integration of function and it's simplified version yields different results

2016-04-10 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 5:01:38 AM UTC+1, rjf wrote: > > I don't know what nonsense you are trying out, but > f(r,phi):=signum(r^2-4) is a function that does not > depend on phi. > > If you want to integrate functions that are discontinuous, there are two > processes > involved. One: fi

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Integration of function and it's simplified version yields different results

2016-04-10 Thread Johan S . R . Nielsen
> Why so offensive? Don't worry - rjf is always spectacularly offensive. His tone is not representative of how the rest of us write on this list. Thanks for taking the time to start this discussion (on which I have no technical input). Best, Johan -- You received this message because you are s

[sage-devel] Re: Integration of function and it's simplified version yields different results

2016-04-10 Thread Sergey V Kozlukov
Why so offensive? > $f$ does not depend on phi So what? The reason for such function --- i was trying to replicate things i was doing in sage (and in sage i was trying to imitate generic behaviour) > if you want to report a bug, it is polite to find the simplest demonstration of the defect that