Good idea, but it doesn't fix the problem. I'm still getting the same
result.
David
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Travis Scrimshaw
wrote:
> DId you try ``make distclean && make``?
>
> Best,
> Travis
>
>
>
> On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 3:34:56 PM UTC-6, David Roe wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying
DId you try ``make distclean && make``?
Best,
Travis
On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 3:34:56 PM UTC-6, David Roe wrote:
>
> I'm trying to merge sage-7.0 into http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/812.
> I've built a fresh sage-7.0 on SMC then did the following (after a bit of
> fiddling around wit
I'm trying to merge sage-7.0 into http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/812.
I've built a fresh sage-7.0 on SMC then did the following (after a bit of
fiddling around with other tickets)
git trac checkout 812
git merge master
make
It ends up with an error that looks like
Building interpreters for fast_
[Sorry for the cross-post]
Hi Dima,
thanks for the email.
> Software Carpentry, see http://software-carpentry.org, is a charity that
> does "Teaching basic lab skills for research computing". But goes beyond
> that; their workshops can include more nontrivial components, e.g. recently
> GAP p
They are fair questions, and it is worth (re)evaluating these things every
once in awhile. Let me know if you have any more.
Best,
Travis
On Saturday, January 23, 2016 at 12:47:40 PM UTC-6, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
> Thank you Travis. By talking with you I do not have any more doubt on
> how/why
Thank you Travis. By talking with you I do not have any more doubt on
how/why this class was built as it is.
Nathann
On 23 January 2016 at 19:39, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>
>>
>> class Poset:
>>
>> def A():
>> for i in ZZ:
>> self._B()
>>
>> def _B():
>> # wor
>
> class Poset:
>
> def A():
> for i in ZZ:
> self._B()
>
> def _B():
> # works on the digraph self._hasse_diagram, taking advantage
> of its labelling
>
> I do not see where the problem is. It requires a helper function _B a
> in the current design (
On Saturday, 23 January 2016 17:22:23 UTC, David Loeffler wrote:
>
> (The joke doesn't actually work in British English, because we'd always
> say "X is really lazy" rather than "X is real lazy".)
>
no, no, the joke is about real vs complex...
> David
>
> On 23 January 2016 at 17:03, Dima Pas
(The joke doesn't actually work in British English, because we'd always say
"X is really lazy" rather than "X is real lazy".)
David
On 23 January 2016 at 17:03, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday, 23 January 2016 14:47:26 UTC, David Loeffler wrote:
>>
>> I have also raised some objections
On Saturday, 23 January 2016 14:47:26 UTC, David Loeffler wrote:
>
> I have also raised some objections on the ticket, which relate less to the
> content of the ticket than to the tone of the discussion (both on the
> ticket and on this thread). It is one thing to propose a change to a file
>
I have also raised some objections on the ticket, which relate less to the
content of the ticket than to the tone of the discussion (both on the
ticket and on this thread). It is one thing to propose a change to a file
name; it is another thing to mock a fellow Sage contributor or to accuse
the
11 matches
Mail list logo
