> Oops, I misread your code. I'm not used to seeing python code in a class
> definition other than defining methods. Sorry. However that clarifies why
> you are putting it into a class.
Actually, it would have been the same outside a class, with the enclosing
module playing the role of the class
Running testsuites has additional dependencies, so using SAGE_CHECK is not
for everybody.
On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 1:23:14 AM UTC+1, Buck Evan wrote:
>
> While that got rid of the previous error, there's something else wrong
> here:
>
> I'm going to assume nobody else compiles with SAGE_C
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 8:53 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> To adapt to the soon-to-be-default Jupyter notebook in Sage, I’m updating the
> Mac app to launch either SageNB or Jupyter depending on a preference.
> Unfortunately, I can’t figure out how to determine if Jupyter is already
> running at al
To adapt to the soon-to-be-default Jupyter notebook in Sage, I’m updating the
Mac app to launch either SageNB or Jupyter depending on a preference.
Unfortunately, I can’t figure out how to determine if Jupyter is already
running at all, let alone in a given directory or on what port. I can scr
In the meantime I discovered
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pyparma
On 17/01/16 00:49, William Stein wrote:
Awesome example!!
On Saturday, January 16, 2016, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello,
For information. I just succeeded in making the interface to PPL as a
standa
Awesome example!!
On Saturday, January 16, 2016, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For information. I just succeeded in making the interface to PPL as a
> standalone Python package ([1] and [2]). Hopefully there was not much work
> needed! It is currently mostly a
On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 1:08:08 AM UTC-8, fhivert wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 03:36:23PM -0800, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
> > In the interest of speed, to avoid calls to `sys,platform`, I would make
> > foo a (module level) @lazy_attribute or @cached_function. IMO a full
> class
While that got rid of the previous error, there's something else wrong here:
I'm going to assume nobody else compiles with SAGE_CHECK=yes, and I
shouldn't either.
```
Plot 3
Plot 4
Code block begin...end
Plot 5
Code block begin...sys:1: DeprecationWarning: The use of coeffs() is now
deprecated
Notably, avoiding installing the documentation for this package reduces the
download size from 400MB(!) to 9MB.
sudo apt-get install --no-install-recommends texlive-latex-extra
On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 4:09:54 PM UTC-8, Buck Evan wrote:
>
> This answers my question, although the que
This answers my question, although the question doesn't match the message I
saw.
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/faq/faq-usage.html#when-i-try-to-use-latex-in-the-notebook-it-says-it-cannot-find-fullpage-sty
On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 12:49:28 PM UTC-8, Buck Evan wrote:
>
> I'm trying to
> On 17/01/2016, at 09:57, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>
> Does anyone knows why the default option for “contours” is
> set to “(0,0)” in implicit_plot (sage/plot/contour_plot.py line 571-572)?
> Instead of being left alone to “None”.
>
>
> I imagine that is what someone set it to long ago either
>
>
>
> +1 really do this.
>
> Last week at the Sage booth at the Joint Mathematics Meetings, I had
> the steady depressing stream of complainers come by and say to me "I
> switched from Sage back to Mathematica because I upgraded Sage and the
> upgrade broke my code." Even deprecations bothe
>
>
>
> Does anyone knows why the default option for “contours” is
> set to “(0,0)” in implicit_plot (sage/plot/contour_plot.py line 571-572)?
> Instead of being left alone to “None”.
>
>
I imagine that is what someone set it to long ago either in copying from
something else or because it made
I'm trying to compile sage from source, and I'm stuck on this step
currently.
```
Compiled with zlib 1.2.8; using zlib 1.2.8
Compiled with poppler version 0.24.5
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.5-1.40.14 (TeX Live 2013/Debian)
restricted \write18 enabled.
entering extended mode
(./example.t
It passed on subsequent `make`.
It's good enough for now, for me.
Yes it's a Debian (Ubuntu 14.04.3).
On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 11:41:57 AM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2016-01-16 20:15, Buck Evan wrote:
> > The cause seems to be gcc segfaulting during tests of cython
> compilat
Hello,
For information. I just succeeded in making the interface to PPL as a
standalone Python package ([1] and [2]). Hopefully there was not much
work needed! It is currently mostly a copy/paste of the corresponding
file from Sage.
Best,
Vincent
[1] https://github.com/videlec/pplpy
[2]
On 2016-01-16 20:15, Buck Evan wrote:
The cause seems to be gcc segfaulting during tests of cython compilation.
A broken GCC? Let me guess... Debian?
You can rebuild Sage with the environment variable
SAGE_INSTALL_GCC=yes
That will install a properly working GCC.
--
You received this message
Should I not attempt to build with testing? I've exported SAGE_CHECK=yes`,
which is mentioned in the README and looked like a good idea.
The cause seems to be gcc segfaulting during tests of cython compilation.
```
[1/1] Cythonizing
/home/buck/trees/mine/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/cython-0.2
I apologize. Resolved as "RTFM".
On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:46:33 AM UTC-8, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> sage: log_gamma(x)
> log_gamma(x)
> sage: log_gamma(4.0)
> 1.79175946922805
>
>
> On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 7:35:20 PM UTC+1, Buck Evan wrote:
>>
>> It would be helpful if I could u
sage: log_gamma(x)
log_gamma(x)
sage: log_gamma(4.0)
1.79175946922805
On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 7:35:20 PM UTC+1, Buck Evan wrote:
>
> It would be helpful if I could use the loggamma function with sage, both
> in numerical and symbolic form.
>
> Some references:
>
> * https://en.wikipedi
It would be helpful if I could use the loggamma function with sage, both in
numerical and symbolic form.
Some references:
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function#The_log-gamma_function
* http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LogGammaFunction.html
* https://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/Log
Are you switching between Sage-6 and Sage-7 based branches? Then you need
to recompile everything ("make distclean && make")
On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 5:53:45 PM UTC+1, Anna Haensch wrote:
>
> Thanks for the replies. I just made a fresh new clone, then checked out
> the branch, and trie
Yes please! Sorry for the trouble.
Vincent
On 16/01/16 14:05, John H Palmieri wrote:
It looks like it's fixed. I guess I should stop posting all of that spam
there, then?
John
On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 8:47:48 AM UTC-8, vdelecroix wrote:
We are experimenting ip bans (because of s
It looks like it's fixed. I guess I should stop posting all of that spam
there, then?
John
On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 8:47:48 AM UTC-8, vdelecroix wrote:
>
> We are experimenting ip bans (because of spam). I just flush one of the
> list. Please tell me if it is fixed.
>
> On 16/01/16
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 05:55:01AM -0800, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> IMHO this is still far from the best way of doing such things - namely,
> wrap whatever platform-specific you must do with semaphores in a special
> class, so that the code where they are used does not do any
> platform-specific th
Thanks for the replies. I just made a fresh new clone, then checked out
the branch, and tried to run make, and got a different error, this time
it's:
Error installing package mpfr-3.1.2.p0
And now I can't run sage. To be clear, I ran precisely the following
commands:
annahaensch$ git clo
We are experimenting ip bans (because of spam). I just flush one of the
list. Please tell me if it is fixed.
On 16/01/16 13:40, William Stein wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 8:39 AM, John H Palmieri wrote:
It looks like ask.sagemath.org is down, and has been for several days. (Or
is it just me
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 8:39 AM, John H Palmieri wrote:
> It looks like ask.sagemath.org is down, and has been for several days. (Or
> is it just me?) If it's not just me, can someone restart it?
It's just you:
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/http://ask.sagemath.org
>
> --
> John
>
>
It looks like ask.sagemath.org is down, and has been for several days. (Or
is it just me?) If it's not just me, can someone restart it?
--
John
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving em
As usual, nobody reviewed changes to the (re)location error messages. I
think its crucial that this goes into Sage 7 which we should get out asap.
[ ] I prefer the incorrect error messages
[ ] Hold it, I still want to add my pet feature to that ticket
--
You received this message because you
IMHO this is still far from the best way of doing such things - namely,
wrap whatever platform-specific you must do with semaphores in a special
class, so that the code where they are used does not do any
platform-specific things at all.
Otherwise platform-specific code would proliferate like ver
I presume your university provides VPN access, which is hopefully not
blocked.
Thus, first get on VPN, and then you should be able to to do anything, as
the traffic will be channeled via VPN.
Failing all that, I presume there is a commission that takes care of
landlord stupidity, make a compla
On 2016-01-16 14:29, Ralf Stephan wrote:
https://gist.github.com/piscisaureus/3342247
Sorry, but something which involves manually editing config files is not
"easily checkout a pull request".
But at least it works.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group
On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 11:47:25 AM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2016-01-16 08:15, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> > Another useful thing is that everything on trac is in one git tree.
> I
> > can do "git fetch" and have all tickets ready to check out without
> any
> > hassle
Dear Volker,
Am Samstag, 16. Januar 2016 13:33:45 UTC+1 schrieb Volker Braun:
>
> Use ssh instead of https:
>
> git remote remove trac
> git remote add trac g...@trac.sagemath.org:sage.git
>
>
Thanks, it did work! Now there only remains to convince my landlord to
enable ssh in the WiFi that he pr
Use ssh instead of https:
git remote remove trac
git remote add trac g...@trac.sagemath.org:sage.git
On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 12:30:43 PM UTC+1, Simon King wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Recently, I was unable to work for some reasons, one of them being a crash
> of my laptop. I now have a new one,
Hi!
Recently, I was unable to work for some reasons, one of them being a crash
of my laptop. I now have a new one, running Ubuntu.
When trying
git trac pull
or just
git pull
on some ticket, I get the error:
fatal: unable to access 'https://trac.sagemath.org/sage.git/': server
certificat
On 2016-01-16 08:15, Ralf Stephan wrote:
On the other hand you can unsubscribe from each of these branches of
conversation. Also, since a new code branch is a separate pull request
the old branch stays visible until it's explicitly closed. It's up to
you to add
# links if you want. Moreover, back
On 2016-01-16 08:15, Ralf Stephan wrote:
Another useful thing is that everything on trac is in one git tree. I
can do "git fetch" and have all tickets ready to check out without any
hassle. I don't know if you can easily checkout a pull request from
github.
Of course you can.
Pl
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 03:36:23PM -0800, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
> In the interest of speed, to avoid calls to `sys,platform`, I would make
> foo a (module level) @lazy_attribute or @cached_function. IMO a full class
> is a lot more than you need.
First of all, in my usecase, those are only two
On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 7:45:23 PM UTC+1, vdelecroix wrote:
>
> I only see a potential increase of the number of pull
> requests. Which would actually be bad since we have a lot of pending
tickets.
>
You're assuming that tickets are still pending only because of the number
of tickets.
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016, Volker Braun wrote:
The trac vm disk was full again.
df -h | mail -s "Disk usage report" some.addr...@somewhere.net
to cron.weekly? Kind of poor man's Nagios, but better than nothing.
--
Jori Mäntysalo
42 matches
Mail list logo
