I am guessing that the pexpect upgrade is behind this particular problem.
`sage/interface/gap.py` will probably need to be inspected for the case
of gap3.
François
> On 28/12/2015, at 11:19, Anne Schilling wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I upgraded to the newest development version of sage and I am now hav
On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 9:19:31 AM UTC-8, Daniel Lännström wrote:
>
> # BUT THIS FAILS
> assert J2(0) == J1(0)
>
Equality of elements of point sests of different jacobians is indeed
inconsistent, but with something else than what you note:
sage: J1(x,1)+J2(x,1)
(x^2, y + 6)
Apparently
Also, how do I now install old packages that I still need? For example
sage -i sage-mode
does not work.
Thank you!
Anne
On Monday, December 28, 2015 at 12:02:11 PM UTC+11, Anne Schilling wrote:
>
> I can run
>
> sage: gap=Gap3('/Applications/gap3r4p4/bin/gap')
> sage: gap.an_element()
> 2
>
>
> On Dec 27, 2015, at 11:47, Daniel Lännström
> wrote:
>
> There seems to be something wrong with equality in
> sage.schemes.hyperelliptic_curves.jacobian_morphism.JacobianMorphism_divisor_class_field
>
> This code demonstrates the weird behavior:
>
> x = GF(7)['x'].gen()
> H1 = Hyperellipti
I can run
sage: gap=Gap3('/Applications/gap3r4p4/bin/gap')
sage: gap.an_element()
2
Is that what you meant?
On Monday, December 28, 2015 at 10:35:32 AM UTC+11, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Can you run gap3 on the command line?
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Can you run gap3 on the command line?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
Hi!
I upgraded to the newest development version of sage and I am now having
trouble with
many of the packages I was using before (and now do not seem to work any
longer).
Most importantly, the following worked for me before and now raises an
error:
sage: gap=Gap3('/Applications/gap3r4p4/bin/
With dot2tex.
Best,
Travis
On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 10:58:46 AM UTC-6, Jori Mäntysalo wrote:
>
> On Sun, 27 Dec 2015, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>
> >> Poset({1:[2], 2:[3], 4:[5]}).show()
>
> > I have straight lines for each cover relation with 7.0.beta1
>
> With or without dot2tex? I hav
There seems to be something wrong with equality in
sage.schemes.hyperelliptic_curves.jacobian_morphism.JacobianMorphism_divisor_class_field
This code demonstrates the weird behavior:
x = GF(7)['x'].gen()
H1 = HyperellipticCurve(x^5+1)
H2 = HyperellipticCurve(x^5+1)
J1 = H1.jacobian()
J2 = H2.jac
On Sun, 27 Dec 2015, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
Poset({1:[2], 2:[3], 4:[5]}).show()
I have straight lines for each cover relation with 7.0.beta1
With or without dot2tex? I have it installed.
--
Jori Mäntysalo
Unless you are unsure of how to use git: You don't need an additional code
review just for resolving merge conflicts.
On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 5:32:31 PM UTC+1, Jori Mäntysalo wrote:
>
> On Sun, 27 Dec 2015, William Stein wrote:
>
> > touch this code, then it should split the pose
Hey Jori,
I have straight lines for each cover relation with 7.0.beta1, which is
essentially this but rotated 90 degrees:
1 --> 2 --> 3
4 --> 5
I also believe it is as Nathann says, it builds it essentially
level-by-level (or at least as well-defined as that is).
Best,
Travis
On Sunday, D
On Sun, 27 Dec 2015, William Stein wrote:
touch this code, then it should split the poset to connected
components, draw them, and then adjoin the pictures.
You should put this in a trac ticket.
In principle, yes. But it will propably just be buried in nice-to-have
enhancements,
On Sunday, December 27, 2015, Jori Mäntysalo wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Dec 2015, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
> I expect to have two direct lines, but instead longer line bends at element
>>> 2. Is there some reason for this?
>>>
>>
>> You incorrectly believe that the poset code computes the layout
>> compon
Yo,
> Your explanation is very good. So if somebody (not me!) wants to touch this
> code, then it should split the poset to connected components, draw them, and
> then adjoin the pictures.
Yes, my Lord. Of course, my Lord. I'll make sure that when somebody
will use his time to work on this piece
On Sun, 27 Dec 2015, Nathann Cohen wrote:
I expect to have two direct lines, but instead longer line bends at element
2. Is there some reason for this?
You incorrectly believe that the poset code computes the layout
component by component. It does not. I don't think I ever read it, but
I belie
On Sun, 27 Dec 2015, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
make distclean && make
Thanks, that worked.
--
Jori Mäntysalo
> I expect to have two direct lines, but instead longer line bends at element
> 2. Is there some reason for this?
You incorrectly believe that the poset code computes the layout
component by component. It does not. I don't think I ever read it, but
I believe that it partitions the vertex set accor
Hi.
Everything worked fine after the second 'make'. now version is 7.0.beta1
thank you all
El viernes, 25 de diciembre de 2015, 20:37:07 (UTC+1), jhonrubia6 escribió:
>
> Hi,
> this is the first time I try to contribute. I began making a single change
> in the comments, here is the diff
> MacBoo
On Sunday, 27 December 2015 09:11:24 UTC, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> make distclean && make
>
(in some cases even 'make distclean' won't work. Volker posted here a git
command to use instead...)
>
> is the only way to switch from 6.10 to 7.0...
>
> On Sunday, 27 December 2015 07:40:08 UTC, Jor
make distclean && make
is the only way to switch from 6.10 to 7.0...
On Sunday, 27 December 2015 07:40:08 UTC, Jori Mäntysalo wrote:
>
> I did git checkout develop and git pull. Now I can make build but both
> make (i.e. building docs also) and ./sage gives
>
> ImportError: libpari-gmp-2.8.so.0
21 matches
Mail list logo
