So what should be the result of 5.multifactorial(3)... 5 or 10?
On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 2:41:59 PM UTC+5:30, prateek sharma wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I am looking for multifactorial function in the source code but unable
> to.Help me out...
>
--
You received this message because you are subscr
Apparently our R interface does not, because it is started with "--vanilla"
switch, whose meaning is (on the bottom):
--saveDo save workspace at the end of the session
--no-save Don't save it
--no-environ Don't read the site and user environment files
Hi,
I'm one of the MPIR developers. I am unable to find any information on this
issue. And Arch Linux seems to have a working MPIR-2.7.0 package which
doesn't require any specific patching:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpir/
My guess is something unusual with your system, or a recent ch
On Saturday, October 31, 2015 at 8:31:59 AM UTC-7, prateek sharma wrote:
>
> From the given code for
> sage:5.multifactorial(3)
> 5
> But the result should be 10.
>
There has been work on this:
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/5415
but it looks like momentum was lost. There seems to be some disa
>From the given code for
sage:5.multifactorial(3)
5
But the result should be 10.
I changed th recurssion code but its still not working properly.
Can anybody help me out?
On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 2:41:59 PM UTC+5:30, prateek sharma wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I am looking for multifactorial function
def multifactorial(self, int k):
r"""
Computes the k-th factorial `n!^{(k)}` of self. For k=1
this is the standard factorial, and for k greater than one it is
the product of every k-th terms down from self to k. The recursive
definition is used to exte
>
> so I guess the optional='internet' hasn't been running yet when people do
> tests...
>
No, it hasn't. So far only the (new style) optional packages are
automatically detected and tested.
I started (and gave up) an attempt to bring this further:
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18904
I
