Reasons we should have stuck with hg: http://xkcd.com/1597/
sage: xkcd(1597)
Githttp://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/git.png"; title="If that
doesn't fix it, git.txt contains the phone number of a friend of mine who
understands git. Just wait through a few minutes of 'It's really pretty
simple, just thi
Solved! For some reason the file
/usr/local/src/Math/sage-6.9/local/lib/python2.7/distutils/unixccompiler.py
is not behaving fine and it passes the '-R' option to mpicc instead of
'-Wl,-R'.
When
/usr/local/src/Math/sage-6.9/local/lib/python
was not in the PYTHONPATH, then python was using the sy
Just found out more about this bug:
if I set the PYTHONPATH var to
/usr/local/src/Math/sage-6.9/local/lib/python/site_packages
then the code compiles fine, since rather than the '-R' option it is used
the correct '-Wl,-R'.
If, instead, I set it, as sage does, to
/usr/local/src/Math/sage-6.9/loc
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 6:49 PM, David Joyner wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 5:10 PM, David Joyner wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
>>> Are those the new binaries that I built with SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes, or the
>>> previous ones? The new md5sum is:
>>>
>>> $ md5 *
>
Hello,
I'm trying to compile sage on a cluster with openmpi (distro:
slackware-current) and I'm getting the error below when trying to compile
pyzmq.
It seems that a '-R' option is passed to gcc, which makes the compiling
process fail. I tried a simple 'python setup.py build' in the
sage-6.9/lo
On Friday, October 30, 2015 at 8:50:42 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, 30 October 2015 05:38:56 UTC, prateek sharma wrote:
>>
>>
>> It should be like
>> a=42
>> k=3
>> sage: a.multifactorial(k)
>>
>
> I told you to display the source code for this function, as this is what
> y
On Friday, 30 October 2015 05:38:56 UTC, prateek sharma wrote:
>
>
> It should be like
> a=42
> k=3
> sage: a.multifactorial(k)
>
I told you to display the source code for this function, as this is what
you asked, no?
>
> On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 2:50:01 PM UTC+5:30, Dima Pasechnik
Hi,
Yesterday I upgraded one partition to 16.04 (xenial), sage-10 beta 2
compiles good with compilateur 5.2.1. At the moment I see no difference,
tough a lot of recent files.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from th
Hello, I just got an error trying to compile sage 6.9 from source, on a
just updated archlinux with kernel 4.2.3.
A couple of days ago I could upgrade my working installation, and it
worked, but it failed at building the documentation.
Regards
libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015, Nathann Cohen wrote:
Now, to give a testable example of this kind of function one must put
sorted() to output or do someting like (1 in result, 2 in result) --> True.
Should we show them to user? I think that this could be argued to both
directions.
In those cases I'd sa
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015, John H Palmieri wrote:
Since we can already detect doctests, and among those we can already detect
the various doctest flags, we should be able to hide those flags. The TESTS
blocks are a different situation. If we insist that TESTS blocks are always
the last thing in the do
11 matches
Mail list logo
