On Sunday, October 11, 2015 at 5:01:32 PM UTC+2, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>
> > ./sage -t --serial --valgrind
>
I found out that the serial option is not only unnecessary here but even
will in certain cases prevent it all to work.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On Sunday, October 11, 2015 at 4:42:46 PM UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> ./sage -t --serial filename.py
>
Thanks. However, none of the permutations of "-t --serial --valgrind" seems
to
have the desired effect. The closest I get with the following which
immediately quits:
> ./sage -t --serial
On 2015-10-11 16:11, Ralf Stephan wrote:
Is there a ready made solution to run all doctest commands from a file
in a single process?
./sage -t --serial filename.py
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group an
Here is one suggestion for a general solution in SAGE to the problem about
generating arbitrary meshes of curves on surfaces in 3D or of curves and/or
surfaces in 3D-volume deformations (i.e.,
(x=fx(u,v,w),y=fy(u,v,w),z=fz(u,v,w)), which includes also 3D-scalar fields
(i.e., t=f(x,y,z), t is a
Is there a ready made solution to run all doctest commands from a file in a
single process?
Equivalently, a way to get a script from all doctest commands (ignoring the
results)?
This would be handy for getting a good memcheck with valgrind, which
doesn't seem possible with running subprocesses.
