The doctesting framework checks whether there are any explicit source line
numbers present; They shouldn't be in doctests as it produces fragile tests
(add a line in the source code and the test fails).
On Saturday, July 4, 2015 at 7:15:12 PM UTC+2, Simon King wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Working on
> In any case, I think that the above amendmend of SageMath's install
> script would make life for package maintainers easier.
I am thinking that if we were to add this 'interactive license
agreement' to the spkg-install of a non-GPL-compatible package, it
could be a problem when that package gets
Hi Nathann,
On 2015-07-04, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> I've got no idea for I never met this message in my life, but could that be
> because you added a message corrsponding to a deprecation warning ?
>
> These messages usually start with a number corresponding to where in the
> file they are locate
I've got no idea for I never met this message in my life, but could that be
because you added a message corrsponding to a deprecation warning ?
These messages usually start with a number corresponding to where in the
file they are located, and we usually replace this number with '...'
somewhere
Hi!
Working on some ticket, I get
> ./sage -t src/sage/interfaces/singular.py
too many failed tests, not using stored timings
Running doctests with ID 2015-07-04-19-04-56-bb23133a.
Git branch: t/18848/do_not_save___objects_we_cannot_load__
Using --optional=ccache,database_gap,gap_packages,mpir,py
On 4 July 2015 at 15:19, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le vendredi 03 juil. 2015 à 16:51:19 (+0100), Nathann Cohen a écrit :
> > > but this is not interactive and no confirmation is requested. Should
> it?
> >
> > My understanding is that you do not need to in this situation: the
> > user explic
Hi All,
On 2015-07-04, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Le vendredi 03 juil. 2015 à 16:51:19 (+0100), Nathann Cohen a écrit :
>> > but this is not interactive and no confirmation is requested. Should it?
>>
>> My understanding is that you do not need to in this situation: the
>> user explicitly asked to i
Hi,
Le vendredi 03 juil. 2015 à 16:51:19 (+0100), Nathann Cohen a écrit :
> > but this is not interactive and no confirmation is requested. Should it?
>
> My understanding is that you do not need to in this situation: the
> user explicitly asked to install a non-GPL-compatible software, so "he
>
