[sage-devel] Re: Extremely broad bug in Sage Integral Computations

2015-06-02 Thread Ralf Stephan
On Tuesday, June 2, 2015 at 7:26:50 PM UTC+2, Gregory Bard wrote: > > However, I think the interface between Sage and Maxima is causing the > (incorrect) substitution of sqrt( cot(x)^2 ) = cot(x). > Something is happening in the interface, yes, but Interestingly, while I do not know Maxima, a

[sage-devel] Re: Full-time Sage developer position opening at Université Paris-Sud for Fall 2015

2015-06-02 Thread Dominique Laurain
Bonjour Nicolas, Suis-je autorisé à diffuser cette annonce aux anciens éléves de l'ENSEEIHT ? Comme vous le savez sans doute c'est une école d"ingénieurs (ENSI) toulousaine avec plusieurs filières dont une en Mathématiques et Informatique (je suis promo 1984 de cette filière). L'annonce pourr

[sage-devel] Re: Web Interface

2015-06-02 Thread Gregory Bard
You might also want to consider SageMathCell, which has fewer buttons, and can look less intimidating at times. For example, http://sagecell.sagemath.org/?z=eJxLV7BVSMlPSU1OzEhNKcrP09Dk5eLlStcrzsgv19AEAJBZCOs=&lang=sage A fun example, for teaching math to younger folks, is to play with patterns

[sage-devel] Extremely broad bug in Sage Integral Computations

2015-06-02 Thread Gregory Bard
Hi everyone. I have found a bug in how Sage computes integrals, but it seems to be the case that it can come up in a broad set of situations. This bug caused me tremendous embarrassment while teaching Calculus II last semester. Consider the integral of sqrt( cot(x)^2 ). I think we can all agre

Re: [sage-devel] Re: dpkg: error processing package sagemath-upstream-binary (--configure):

2015-06-02 Thread Jan Groenewald
Hi Thierry, The binaries have not done anything wrong (except perhaps confuse dpkg-source because it comes from a different location). dpkg-source is the real culprit. Regards, Jan On 2 June 2015 at 12:08, Thierry wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 05:42:03PM +0200, Jan Groenewald wrote:

Re: [sage-devel] Re: dpkg: error processing package sagemath-upstream-binary (--configure):

2015-06-02 Thread Thierry
Hi, On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 05:42:03PM +0200, Jan Groenewald wrote: > The sage installation tree has moved is *probably* unrelated. It always > says that on upgrade. I suspect two possibilities > 1) it is from Thierry's binary not a buildslave binary > 2) I changed the dpkg-source format from quil

Re: [sage-devel] Full-time Sage developer position opening at Université Paris-Sud for Fall 2015

2015-06-02 Thread Nathann Cohen
> > ... the first such position ever! :-) > I should apply, that's 40% more than what I earn. Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-dev

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sequences in SageMath

2015-06-02 Thread Ralf Stephan
> > I wasn't aware of these tickets. I'll have a look... > In general you can find tickets for specific interest in symbolics and comm. algebra via the summary pages which are more or less up to date: http://trac.sagemath.org/wiki/symbolics http://trac.sagemath.org/wiki/algebra Regards, --

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sequences in SageMath

2015-06-02 Thread Daniel Krenn
Am 2015-06-02 um 09:01 schrieb Ralf Stephan: > Please study and contribute to what's already there. > > People have thought hard about this in: > http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15673 > http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16107 > http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16137 I wasn't aware of these tickets.

[sage-devel] Re: sequences in SageMath

2015-06-02 Thread Ralf Stephan
Please study and contribute to what's already there. People have thought hard about this in: http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15673 http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16107 http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16137 If you're specifically talking about P-recursivity see http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/157