[sage-devel] multi_polynomial_ideal doctest failure

2015-03-14 Thread Vincent Delecroix
Dear all, While rewriting part of sage.rings.arith I modified the behavior of the binomial functions with respect to the output type (see #17852): old version (sage-6.5): sage: type(binomial(4/1, 2)) sage: type(binomial(4, 2/1)) new version (#17852): sage: type(binomial(4/1,2)) sage: type(

Re: [sage-devel] Re: White-haired needs_review tickets

2015-03-14 Thread Ralf Stephan
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17958 On Saturday, March 14, 2015 at 6:24:41 PM UTC+1, Snark wrote: > Le 14/03/2015 16:32, Ralf Stephan a écrit : > > On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 at 5:44:53 PM UTC+1, Snark wrote: > >> > >> What should be really done with long-waiting needs_review tickets ? > >> >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: White-haired needs_review tickets

2015-03-14 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 14/03/2015 16:32, Ralf Stephan a écrit : On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 at 5:44:53 PM UTC+1, Snark wrote: What should be really done with long-waiting needs_review tickets ? See them as a database of ideas, similar to 5-year old requests for enhancement. Tickets are a database of ideas.

Re: [sage-devel] White-haired needs_review tickets

2015-03-14 Thread help
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 at 1:19:45 PM UTC-7, Snark wrote: > > Le 11/03/2015 17:53, William Stein a écrit : > >1. Setup/write an editorial notification system to encourage the > > reviewing of tickets, similar to how every journal on the planet has > > an automated system for ensuring

[sage-devel] Re: White-haired needs_review tickets

2015-03-14 Thread kcrisman
> What should be really done with long-waiting needs_review tickets ? >> > See them as a database of ideas, similar to 5-year old requests for > enhancement. > > +1 > Honestly, those are not the problem, but rather the failure to push > necessary but painful changes like the declare_var/funct

[sage-devel] Re: White-haired needs_review tickets

2015-03-14 Thread Ralf Stephan
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 at 5:44:53 PM UTC+1, Snark wrote: > > What should be really done with long-waiting needs_review tickets ? > See them as a database of ideas, similar to 5-year old requests for enhancement. Honestly, those are not the problem, but rather the failure to push necessary b

[sage-devel] trac database not updated?

2015-03-14 Thread Ralf Stephan
Hello, when viewing "Recent activity" I see entries from 15 hours ago as being 21 min ago. OTOH the times in the resp. tickets look good. Don't know if there are other problems. Yes, I cleared the browser cache. Just FYI. Regards, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go