Volker:
Yes, your suggested 'fix' works.
My standard CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS that was failing on zeromq:
CFLAGS=-march=native -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -W -Wall
CXXFLAGS=-march=native -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -W -Wall
The following work:
CFLAGS=-march=native -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe
Hi,
Le 22/02/2015 20:34, Franco Saliola a écrit :
Hello sage-devel,
I sent the following email to sage-release, but I think it really belongs
here. I'm looking for ideas on how to debug (or better, how to fix) the
problems with GP/PARI interface that are causing sage to hang.
The symptoms lo
On 2015-02-22 15:24, Simon King wrote:
Seriously? I didn't know that Sage's coercion model has such special
cases. OK, it makes it possible to get a typical usecase with least effort.
But my impression is that ultimately such special cases cause a lot more
confusion than a clear model in the spir
On 2015-02-22 20:34, Franco Saliola wrote:
o gp('2 + 3') hangs in sage
What's the contents of ~/.sage/gp-expect.log after doing just this in a
Sage session?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group an
Do you have a system wide pari/gp install?
Francois
On 02/23/15 08:34, Franco Saliola wrote:
Hello sage-devel,
I sent the following email to sage-release, but I think it really
belongs here. I'm looking for ideas on how to debug (or better, how to
fix) the problems with GP/PARI interface that
Hello sage-devel,
I sent the following email to sage-release, but I think it really belongs
here. I'm looking for ideas on how to debug (or better, how to fix) the
problems with GP/PARI interface that are causing sage to hang.
Thanks,
Franco
-- Forwarded message --
From: Franco
Hi Eric,
On 2015-02-22, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
> Note that the function is_Integer used in sage.structure.coerce.pyx is=20
> *not* the above one: it is defined in lines 134-139 and it returns True for=
> is_Integer(int(0)).=20
Seriously? But when the integer zero is treated in a special way, th
Le dimanche 22 février 2015 15:24:53 UTC+1, Simon King a écrit :
>
>
> Seriously? I didn't know that Sage's coercion model has such special
> cases. OK, it makes it possible to get a typical usecase with least
> effort.
> But my impression is that ultimately such special cases cause a lot more
Hi Eric,
On 2015-02-22, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
> Yes that's conversion, but both 0+x and x+0 works because, I think, of=20
> lines 979-990 of=20
> sage.structure.coerce.pyx:
> # Allow coercion of 0 even if no coercion from Z
> if is_Integer(x) and not x and type(yp) is not type:
Dear all,
The documentation on http://www.sagemath.org/doc/index.html is for Sage
v6.6.beta0. Shouldn't it be for Sage v6.5?
Cheers,
Bruno
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
On 22 February 2015 at 10:00, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Le dimanche 22 février 2015 00:28:42 UTC+1, Simon King a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> On 2015-02-21, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
>> > It seems that a possible way to have 0 + MyElement work even if ZZ does=
>> >=20
>> > not coerce
On Sun, 22 Feb 2015 03:17:13 -0800 (PST)
Volker Braun wrote:
> Just to tell you what you already know, the symbolic ring is the
> parent of last resort if there is nothing more specific. So its to be
> expected that you don't have any canonical maps elsewhere.
>
> Pynac should probably unwind th
Just to tell you what you already know, the symbolic ring is the parent of
last resort if there is nothing more specific. So its to be expected that
you don't have any canonical maps elsewhere.
Pynac should probably unwind the comparison of two wrapped (non-symbolic)
python objects to the compa
Hi,
Just to tell that no later than two days ago, I had a bug in my code that
was caused by
bool(SR(0) < Infinity) returning False.
I was about to post a message to sage-devel, but thanks to your post, I
realize this is a known issue.
Best wishes,
Eric.
--
You received this message becau
Hello,
a long standing issue is
sage: bool(pihttp://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12967
at which I'm having a naive stab (because it interferes with #14801).
Maybe I can learn something?
In the ticket the problem has been said having to do with Pynac,
but I don't think so. It would all work nicely if,
Hi Simon,
Le dimanche 22 février 2015 00:28:42 UTC+1, Simon King a écrit :
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 2015-02-21, Eric Gourgoulhon >
> wrote:
> > It seems that a possible way to have 0 + MyElement work even if ZZ does=
> >=20
> > not coerce to MyElement.parent() is to have=20
> > MyElement.parent(
Wrong link to zeromq master, should be
https://github.com/zeromq/zeromq4-1/commit/00aeaddf945cf7bdca33473fdd591a0f874ab2b4
On Sunday, February 22, 2015 at 9:45:26 AM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Seems to be fixed in the next zeromq version:
> https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/tree/master/tests
Seems to be fixed in the next zeromq
version: https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/tree/master/tests
Can you try
CXXFLAGS="-Wno-error=unused-parameter" make
or maybe just CFLAGS. If it works we can add it as a workaround.
On Sunday, February 22, 2015 at 4:07:13 AM UTC+1, rich...@pacbell.net wr
18 matches
Mail list logo
