Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage grant

Hello ! > Regarding this request, William has a question which interactive > "visualization" > objects would be most useful for people with combinatorial inclination. > Certainly graphs, trees, but I guess also 3- or multi-dimensional objects > such as plane partitions and polytopes ... Anything

[sage-devel] Re: Sage grant

Regarding this request, William has a question which interactive "visualization" objects would be most useful for people with combinatorial inclination. Certainly graphs, trees, but I guess also 3- or multi-dimensional objects such as plane partitions and polytopes ... Anything else? Best, Anne

Re: [sage-devel] Backwards incompatible change to ManinSymbolList

Does your change impact performance? - William Stein (cell phone) On Jan 3, 2015 10:57 PM, "Travis Scrimshaw" wrote: > Hey everyone, >I have proposed a change to #17578 > which is backwards incompatible > in the sense that the returned value from __get

[sage-devel] Backwards incompatible change to ManinSymbolList

Hey everyone, I have proposed a change to #17578 which is backwards incompatible in the sense that the returned value from __getitem__ is no longer one of the indexing elements but a ManinSymbol instance whose parent is the ManinSymbolList. In particul

[sage-devel] Re: Problems configuring git-trac

Whats the actual output of ssh-keygen -lf /path/to/key I take it your ssh key comment is not 7-bit clean. I'll fix it. On Saturday, January 3, 2015 2:53:54 PM UTC+1, mmarco wrote: > > Happy new year everybody, > > I decided to give git-trac a chance, but when i tried to configure i got > the f

[sage-devel] Problems configuring git-trac

Happy new year everybody, I decided to give git-trac a chance, but when i tried to configure i got the following error: mmarco@mountain ~/sage $ git trac config --user mmarco --pass 'madmath' Saved trac username. Saved trac password. Trac xmlrpc URL: http://trac.sagemath.org/xmlrpc (anonymou

Re: [sage-devel] functions for work in finite fields

On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Sam Rogers wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm a high school student, and I just finished doing some research with my > Linear Algebra professor in Finite Field Theory. Most of my research was > conducted using Sage, and my professor recommended I look into adapting wh

[sage-devel] functions for work in finite fields

Hello everyone, I'm a high school student, and I just finished doing some research with my Linear Algebra professor in Finite Field Theory. Most of my research was conducted using Sage, and my professor recommended I look into adapting what I had done into Sage itself. However, I'm not entirely

Re: [sage-devel] discovering coercions (related to groups and cartesian products)

Am 2015-01-02 um 23:10 schrieb David Roe: > Take a look at sage/categories/pushout.py. You will need to define > construction() methods on both A and B, which return pairs (F_A, X_A) > and (F_B, X_B), where the F are ConstructionFunctors with F_A(X_A) = A > and F_B(X_B) = B. You then need to tell