Hello,
abs(matrix) is currently returning the determinant (and this goes back
to the early implementation in 2006!). If anybody contests the fact
that it should return the matrix whose entries are the absolute value
of the initial matrix, please tell me.
Otherwise, #17443 needs review.
Vincent
here's the link, for those interested
http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?page_number=1&doc_id=1322836&image_number=2
regards
john perry
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emai
2014-12-03 3:24 UTC+01:00, Nathann Cohen :
>> sage: a = CIF(RIF(0, 1), RIF(0, 1))
>> sage: a is a
>> True
>> sage: a == a
>> False
>>
>> So equality is not even reflexive.
>
> Okay. Please never define a graph with these things as vertices :-D
+1
And for better behavior, we need troolean = {True,
> Vincent
>
> PS: Not speaking about Findstat, you know that I worked a bit to
> propose something for the database of combinatorial maps (see #16408).
> I receive exactly 0 answer since then... and it was 6 months ago.
>
I know, I still find it a very interesting project but months go quickly
and
Hi Vivianne,
2014-12-03 15:07 UTC+01:00, Viviane Pons :
> My comment on this:
>
> * Findstat does not need such methods to be in sage (anymore), as we
> actually define our own maps outside of Sage (for the good of FindStat and
> for the bad of Sage in my opinion) so at least, no one can be accuse
I am not sure if it is also available in the M's, or if they have some
other system to guide the user to the functions he wants to use, but for
me, tab-completion is a great feature in Sage.
El martes, 2 de diciembre de 2014 22:43:34 UTC+1, maldun escribió:
>
> The emphasis lies on 'trying' Con
I *did ask if I should deprecate, I just wasn't sure if we can deprecate
the alias.
On Wed Dec 03 2014 at 4:10:25 PM john_perry_usm wrote:
> Will the ticket you've opened also deal with multivariate polynomial
> ideals, or are you working on symbolic expressions only?
>
Yes. It's almost always
Sorry for the delay in replying; as noted earlier, I've been traveling. I
agree with Samuel; it's important to deprecate first. Some of us run
scripts that will break if you simply remove the command, but a deprecation
warning both allows the script to keep running and (if it's a good warning)
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 09:30:12AM -0500, David Joyner wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:35 AM, Thierry
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > perhaps this does not even require maintaining a spkg, does the following
> > work ?
> >
> > sage -i pip
> > sage -pip install clawpack
> >
>
> This doesn
2014-12-03 10:27:53 UTC+1, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>
> Sorry, a bit late. I also agree with removing *coeffs* and referring to
> *list *in the documentation of *coefficients*.
>
> What's more, the issue comes up with symbolic expressions too, where
> *coeffs *is an alias of* coefficients*, and ther
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:35 PM, David Joyner wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Harald Schilly
> wrote:
>> Well, just tried their first example, seems like it crashes. No idea :(
>>
>
> Same here.
On SMC we all sit in the same boat. Either it works or it breaks for
everyone. I think it is
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, December 3, 2014 12:09:54 PM UTC+1, David Joyner wrote:
>>
>> maybe having it installed on the cloud would be better
>> anyway?
>
>
> It should be installed on SMC for some time now. Not sure how to to test it?
>
> Well, jus
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:35 AM, Thierry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> perhaps this does not even require maintaining a spkg, does the following
> work ?
>
> sage -i pip
> sage -pip install clawpack
>
This doesn't work for me using ubuntu linux and sage6.4.rc0 built from source.
It says sage -pip is un
My comment on this:
* Findstat does not need such methods to be in sage (anymore), as we
actually define our own maps outside of Sage (for the good of FindStat and
for the bad of Sage in my opinion) so at least, no one can be accused of
being partial
* If a method exists somewhere and has been th
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> Harald? can you delete sage-6.4-x86_64-Darwin-OSX_10.9_x86_64* from the
> mirrors?
ok, they are gone.
-- Harald
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this grou
The 10.9 binaries were built on 10.10, too. They should just be removed.
Harald? can you delete sage-6.4-x86_64-Darwin-OSX_10.9_x86_64* from the
mirrors?
On Wednesday, December 3, 2014 1:58:08 PM UTC, kcrisman wrote:
>
> Stephane, if you are reading this, is Samuel correct in assuming you mean
The 6.4 binary did not build the app version, but we fixed that for 6.4.1.
> The latter are different.
>
Correct - but notice the OP asked about the *10.9* binaries, not 10.10 or
10.7. And those are the ones I reference below, which have the same hash,
and are still at Sage version 6.4.
On Wednesday, December 3, 2014 12:09:54 PM UTC+1, David Joyner wrote:
>
> maybe having it installed on the cloud would be better
> anyway?
>
It should be installed on SMC for some time now. Not sure how to to test it?
Well, just tried their first example, seems like it crashes. No idea :(
--
Hi Thierrys,
You can freeze version with pip
pip install pyclaw=WHATEVER_VERSION
and the advantage is that there is no package to maintain and the sage
side. It is also possible to ask pip to download the tarball in
SAGE_SRC/upstream and install it later. It is easily customized to all
kind of p
Since you are working on it, I really like better
Graph.connected_components_sizes()
rather than
Graph.connected_components_sizes_partition()
Otherwise you should chage
Graph.connected_components_number()
to
Graph.connected_components_number_integer()
The output can be sorte
Le 03/12/2014 11:32, Simon King a écrit :
> Hi Thierry,
>
> On 2014-12-03, Thierry Dumont wrote:
>>> sage -i pip
>>> sage -pip install clawpack
>>
>> But is it the good way to do?
>> Is it not better to have an uniform method for installing things?
>
> I think I remember some people said
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:35 AM, Thierry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> perhaps this does not even require maintaining a spkg, does the following
> work ?
>
> sage -i pip
> sage -pip install clawpack
>
Didn't work for me (mac OS 10.10) but for the people I know that would
be interested, maybe having it
Hi
Le mardi 2 décembre 2014 22:43:34 UTC+1, maldun a écrit :
>
>1. Python: One could always argue about the language itself, but in
>contrast to the others Sage uses a general purpose language. So it easy to
>combine Sage with other programs (Ever build standalone Programs with the
Hi Thierry,
On 2014-12-03, Thierry Dumont wrote:
>> sage -i pip
>> sage -pip install clawpack
>
> But is it the good way to do?
> Is it not better to have an uniform method for installing things?
I think I remember some people said that thie *should* become the
default way of installing
On 2014-12-02, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
[...]
> Also I cannot
> emphasize sufficiently that not all Sage users who use the graph code are
> graph theorists.
Sure, the latter is an excellent defence for names like nchoosek...
Do these people also describe car wheels as "these round things that can
Le 03/12/2014 09:35, Thierry a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> perhaps this does not even require maintaining a spkg, does the following
> work ?
>
> sage -i pip
> sage -pip install clawpack
>
> Ciao,
> Thierry
>
may be.
But is it the good way to do?
Is it not better to have an uniform method for in
Sorry, a bit late. I also agree with removing *coeffs* and referring to
*list *in the documentation of *coefficients*.
What's more, the issue comes up with symbolic expressions too, where
*coeffs *is an alias of* coefficients*, and there is no list function. This
would be the perfect opportuni
I'm trying to get a more precise notion of "one-liner" and understand
better which one-liners should not be in the library. At first I thought
it might be:
"a function which is a composition of at most two 'user space' functions"
but as Nathann just wrote, this is not correct for P.is_connecte
Hi,
perhaps this does not even require maintaining a spkg, does the following
work ?
sage -i pip
sage -pip install clawpack
Ciao,
Thierry
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 08:41:35AM +0100, Thierry Dumont wrote:
> I would like to know if anybody tried to install PyClaw in Sage.
>
> http://www.c
On Wednesday, December 3, 2014, Thierry Dumont
wrote:
> I would like to know if anybody tried to install PyClaw in Sage.
>
> http://www.clawpack.org/doc/pyclaw/
>
> I am interested, and I propose to make an spkg.
I didn't try but know people who are also interested, so please post to
this list
Hello !
> So should we get rid of at least first one? I think no, but how about
> others?
Well, I do not know about others but is_connected is "not exactly" a
one-liner from user perspective.
The function calls self._hasse_diagram.is_connected() while an user would
call P.hasse_diagram().is_conn
31 matches
Mail list logo
