On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, Volker Braun wrote:
Its in 6.4.beta6. Run with "sage --notebook=ipython"
It said that pyzmq is missing. Then sage -i pyzmq said that zmq.h was not
found. (And last "yum whatprovides 'zmq.h'" found no matches...). A bug in
pyzmq?
(Might be, again, something wrong with m
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, Nathann Cohen wrote:
given a Poset, how can you detect if this poset is a meet semilattice ?
For sure we need a function for that ! And it seems that this function
is exactly what join_matrix does.
Of course one can try to build a [semi]lattice and see if it works or not.
>
>
> > Surely there is a good reason for that behavior?
>
> I see at least two reasons:
> - it is not that easy to provide a efficient algorithm for comparisons
> - the comparisons depend on the embedding, which might be in RR, CC
> or an extension of Qp. I do not see how we can have a generic
>
3d graphics inside the ipython notebook is not yet implemented (apart from
the 2d preview). You can launch an external jmol until that is integrated.
On Wednesday, October 22, 2014 8:05:38 PM UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
>
> Answer below.
>
> Le mercredi 22 octobre 2014 19:32:03 UTC+2,
Answer below.
Le mercredi 22 octobre 2014 19:32:03 UTC+2, kcrisman a écrit :
>
>
>
>
> This is #17170
>>
>>>
>
>> I took some time (at last...) to experiment with sage 6.4beta6 and the
>>> new (and impressive !) IPython notebook, and I noticed something curious in
>>> the behaviour of graphics
2014-10-22 17:13 UTC, Volker Braun :
> The number field comparison returns ">" for any two non-equal numbers.
Nope. Not true for quadratic number fields (see #13213).
> Surely there is a good reason for that behavior?
I see at least two reasons:
- it is not that easy to provide a efficient algo
This is #17170
>
>>
> I took some time (at last...) to experiment with sage 6.4beta6 and the new
>> (and impressive !) IPython notebook, and I noticed something curious in the
>> behaviour of graphics in various interfaces.
>>
>> - From command line, typing "plot(sin,[x,-5,5],figsize=3)" [
The number field comparison returns ">" for any two non-equal numbers.
Surely there is a good reason for that behavior? I found this by debugging
polyhedra over number fields (http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17197).
Obviously you can't have polyhedra if your comparison is not working:
sage: K.
This is #17170
On Wednesday, October 22, 2014 4:36:21 PM UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
>
> I took some time (at last...) to experiment with sage 6.4beta6 and the new
> (and impressive !) IPython notebook, and I noticed something curious in the
> behaviour of graphics in various interfaces.
On 22 October 2014 17:12, Volker Braun wrote:
> Its in 6.4.beta6. Run with "sage --notebook=ipython"
Thanks!
John
>
>
> On Wednesday, October 22, 2014 4:55:19 PM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote:
>>
>> I don't think that I have been paying attention. What is this
>> "ipython notenook" and is it part
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:50 AM, mmarco wrote:
> In the download page, we offer binaries for red hat 5.3 (+4 years old) over
> itanium architecture. The version of Sage is 5.0.1 (+2 years old).
>
> Is it really useful to keep it? Are there any actual downloads?
>
> I would say that, if we can supp
Its in 6.4.beta6. Run with "sage --notebook=ipython"
On Wednesday, October 22, 2014 4:55:19 PM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote:
>
> I don't think that I have been paying attention. What is this
> "ipython notenook" and is it part of Sage? How does it relate to the
> existing notebook? How do I run
I don't think that I have been paying attention. What is this
"ipython notenook" and is it part of Sage? How does it relate to the
existing notebook? How do I run it?
John
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from thi
I took some time (at last...) to experiment with sage 6.4beta6 and the new
(and impressive !) IPython notebook, and I noticed something curious in the
behaviour of graphics in various interfaces.
- From command line, typing "plot(sin,[x,-5,5],figsize=3)" [Enter] opens
an mage viewer with the r
Yo !
1) Why is join() defined for join-semilattices, but join_matrix()
> "defined" for posets? (I.e. it works by giving exception if the poset is
> not join-semilattice.)
>
H...
1) I do not know why it is made like that, and I do not like the design
2) After several cycles of "a) answer q
> In the download page, we offer binaries for red hat 5.3 (+4 years old)
> over itanium architecture. The version of Sage is 5.0.1 (+2 years old).
>
> Is it really useful to keep it? Are there any actual downloads?
>
> I would say that, if we can support Fedora over Itanium (that is, if we
> ha
In the download page, we offer binaries for red hat 5.3 (+4 years old) over
itanium architecture. The version of Sage is 5.0.1 (+2 years old).
Is it really useful to keep it? Are there any actual downloads?
I would say that, if we can support Fedora over Itanium (that is, if we
have a buildbot
1) Why is join() defined for join-semilattices, but join_matrix()
"defined" for posets? (I.e. it works by giving exception if the poset is
not join-semilattice.)
2) Would it be useful to have join() function taking more than two
arguments? And if so, should then also L.join(x) return x if x in
The patchbot didn't survive the migration to the new machine. Fixed.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:22 PM, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
> The buildbot was having some issues and was reporting everything as a
> failure. I disabled it until I get a moment to fix it.
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Frédér
19 matches
Mail list logo
