Re: [sage-devel] Buildbot link on "needs work" tickets.

2014-10-06 Thread Nils Bruin
On Monday, October 6, 2014 8:50:19 PM UTC-7, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > > > Do you have an example ticket where it's not working? > > Yes, as originally mentioned: http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17065 which is still "needs work" presently. As you can see, no buildbot link is provided. There is a

Re: [sage-devel] Buildbot link on "needs work" tickets.

2014-10-06 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Nils Bruin wrote: > Dear buildboteers, > > The new buildbot interface is wonderful. However, on #17065 we ran into an > issue that "needs work" tickets do not display the buildbot link. That's > inconvenient in the following scenario: > 1. Author gets a ticket to a

[sage-devel] please review #17107

2014-10-06 Thread Vincent Delecroix
Hello, On sage-support there was a report for a badly written sentence. I created the ticket #17107 (a branch is provided). I am not a native speaker, so please have a careful look on my bad english! Best Vincent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sag

[sage-devel] Re: Please review ipython notebook

2014-10-06 Thread Volker Braun
It was my understanding that selectively extending the templates requires >=3.0, but if you can point me in the right direction for doing on 2.2 then I'd be happy to. On Monday, October 6, 2014 5:32:03 PM UTC+1, Matthias Bussonnier wrote: > > Hey, > > (response following ping of William on IPy

[sage-devel] IntervalFieldElement and Sparse Linear Algebra

2014-10-06 Thread Clemens Heuberger
I'd like to use ComplexIntervalFieldElements in sparse vectors and matrices. Comparison of intervals is somewhat delicate ( for a real interval field element I: I != 0 holds iff 0 is not contained in I I == 0 holds iff I consists only of 0 bool(I) holds iff I does not co

[sage-devel] Re: Please review ipython notebook

2014-10-06 Thread Matthias Bussonnier
Hey, (response following ping of William on IPython ML) Looks nice I haven't looked at everything from your modifications, but I would say that it should be possible to selectively extend the templates to avoid the copy/past which should remove roughly 400 lines and some maintenance burden.

[sage-devel] Re: Please review ipython notebook

2014-10-06 Thread Volker Braun
anybody? On Monday, September 29, 2014 12:48:55 PM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote: > > Now would be a good time to review the IPython notebook: > > http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16996 > > There is clearly more to be done to make the integration perfect, and we > could also always wait for the next