Re: [sage-devel] Category framework strangeness

2014-08-10 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 05:37:48PM +0200, Vincent Delecroix wrote: > Whaou. I guess it means: Category of (associative additive) > (commutative additive) (associative additive) unital distributive > magmas and additive magmas. But definitely, there is something wrong > ;-) It's: Category of assoc

[sage-devel] Re: Best way to discuss an open ticket?

2014-08-10 Thread Volker Braun
If you know who wrote the code in question or who maintains it, you can CC them on the trac ticket. Other than that, posting to sage-devel is perfectly ok if you have questions. On Sunday, August 10, 2014 9:35:58 PM UTC+1, Paul Graham wrote: > > Im not sure if the other developer that has now

[sage-devel] Re: Best way to discuss an open ticket?

2014-08-10 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2014-08-10, Paul Graham wrote: > --=_Part_2607_1440653767.1407702958902 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Im not sure if the other developer that has now made a comment on the > ticket im using as an example, #16228, did so because i made this post to > the mailing list or bec

[sage-devel] Re: Best way to discuss an open ticket?

2014-08-10 Thread Paul Graham
Im not sure if the other developer that has now made a comment on the ticket im using as an example, #16228, did so because i made this post to the mailing list or because they came across it purely through trac somehow. I dont know if thats a coincidence or not, but basically i am just wonderi

[sage-devel] Best way to discuss an open ticket?

2014-08-10 Thread Paul Graham
In working on some of the beginner tickets, and for some of them they are straightforward enough that i can work on them on my own up to changing the status to needs-review. But for others if im unsure where to start on it, or cant push my code to trac without input from other developers, what i