[sage-devel] Re: Solving rational inequality should give simplified result

2014-07-14 Thread parisse
That's unfortunate for sage, since giac has other features that sage could take benefit of, like much faster Groebner basis on Q, rational univariate representation, and other multivariate polynomial operations (*, gcd, factorization). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

[sage-devel] Re: Please review Python 2.7.8 update

2014-07-14 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Done. Seems good. -- Emmanuel Charpentier Le dimanche 13 juillet 2014 06:53:50 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit : > > > == > Trac #16648: Python 2.7.8 > > New tarball: > http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/vbraun/upstream/py

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Solving rational inequality should give simplified result

2014-07-14 Thread Robert Pollak
Am 11.07.2014 18:51, schrieb parisse: > sage: %giac > > --> Switching to Giac <-- > > giac: solve(abs((x-1)/(x-5)) <= 1/3, x) > list[((x>=-1) and (x<=2))] This looks great, and I could confirm this in Giac/Xcas. However, there is no Sage instance easily available, where this works: Both the c

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage -t --optional=... skips the normal tests?

2014-07-14 Thread John Cremona
On 14 July 2014 01:09, P Purkayastha wrote: > Thanks. This worked. I have been caught out by this one too. When you put the --optional flag on the command line it *only* runs lines with that flag, where the flag "sage" exceptionally means to run the other doctest lines too, the ones with no flag