I wrote
> * What would happen if Maxima were called with the default "domain : real"?
Of course I mean: What would happen if Maxima were *always* called like
that.
I have created the Maxima issue 'fourier_elim and "domain : complex"':
https://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/bugs/2783/
--
You received
Hi Nicolas,
On 2014-07-11, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> Right, though the difference is that containment for a matrix does not
> have a strong mathematical meaning. On the other hand, when we speak
> of a parent - that models some mathematical set like an algebra, the
> notion of containment is una
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 09:42:11AM -0700, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
> I would say this is like matrices: do you want the iterator for
>matrices to iterate by default over all elements or rows? Currently the
>iterator goes over all rows and you can call M.list() to get a flat
>list o
sage: %giac
--> Switching to Giac <--
giac: solve(abs((x-1)/(x-5)) <= 1/3, x)
list[((x>=-1) and (x<=2))]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-
Hey Nicolas,
I would say this is like matrices: do you want the iterator for matrices
to iterate by default over all elements or rows? Currently the iterator
goes over all rows and you can call M.list() to get a flat list of entries.
Actually, this is a question for graded objects in gener
If you mean: "what would happen if sage would initialize maxima_calculus
> (which is maxima_lib) with domain: real?" -- a lot of doctests would break.
>
Yes, that's what I meant, and you are confirming my assumption.
But shouldn't Maxima even give an error message when you ask it to solve an
On Friday, July 11, 2014 2:01:33 AM UTC-7, Robert Pollak wrote:
>
> The following does not work, it still gives the "!= 0" terms:
>
> maxima.eval("domain : real;")
> solve(abs((x-1)/(x-5)) <= 1/3, x)
>
sage: maxima_calculus("domain: real")
real
sage: solve(abs((x-1)/(x-5)) <= 1/3, x)
#0: solve_rat
Hi path algebra fans!
I am having doctests failures in #8678 because of the following
"feature" of quiver path algebras:
sage: P = DiGraph({1:{2:['a']}, 2:{3:['b']}}).path_semigroup()
sage: A = P.algebra(GF(7))
sage: A.list()
[Free module spanned by [e_1, e
Hello Nils, thank you for your analysis!
You wrote:
> It should really be no surprise that inequalities don't play nice with
> "domain: complex"
>
Hm. "domain : complex" is set both in maxima_lib.py and maxima.py. Which
one is responsible here?
It has been in there "forever" (I followed it bac
