William, It seems for me white list should be placed on SMC site. For
example in help page.
воскресенье, 22 июня 2014 г., 22:19:54 UTC+4 пользователь William Stein
написал:
>
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 1:26 AM, Craig E Larson > wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > can you add washington.edu to the whitelis
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 9:22 PM, wrote:
> is available here
>
> www.tag.md/public/
>
While this looks spammy, it seems to be an implementation of
Nash's algorithm from 1955 (recently declassified,
http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/press_room/2012/nash_exhibit.shtml).
I thought Nash's algorithm was
is available here
www.tag.md/public/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
I missed once again a "proper" make download target - with a very fast
network (part of Seattle cluster, so in fact local) downloading standard
packages is easy, yet there still can be some hiccups that interrupt
compilation. And of course I was not watching what's going on for a bit
since comp
It worked! I initially tried this, but it didn't work because the tarball
from mpir.org was named "mpir-2.7.0[DASH]alpha4.tar.bz2" where the one it
was trying to download was "mpir-2.7.0[DOT]alpha4.tar.bz2".
Thanks again!
On Sunday, June 22, 2014 7:20:25 PM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On 2
On 2014-06-22, Jason Wu wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm fairly new to sage and I was trying to build sage on cygwin64. I cloned
> the git repo and checked out u/jpflori/cygwin64 but it gets stuck when it
> tries to download mpir 2.7.0.alpha4. mpir2.6.0 (used in master branch)
> won't build on cygwin64. a
Hello,
I'm fairly new to sage and I was trying to build sage on cygwin64. I cloned
the git repo and checked out u/jpflori/cygwin64 but it gets stuck when it
tries to download mpir 2.7.0.alpha4. mpir2.6.0 (used in master branch)
won't build on cygwin64. anyways, sage-spkg uses curl to try and dow
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> William Stein gmail.com> writes:
>
>>
>>
>> Is there a way to create a local mirror of all of pypi?
>
> One can use the bandersnatch package for this:
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/bandersnatch
Thanks!
>
> --
> You received this messa
As Niles already said it would be better to have it as a symbolic function
sage: f(x) = real_nth_root(x, 5)
sage: f
x |--> real_nth_root(x,5)
2014-06-22 22:36 UTC+02:00, Gregory Bard :
> Yes, that is reasonable. Let us call it "real_nth_root" instead, as
> suggested by Nicolas Thiery. Any other r
On 2014-06-22, Gregory Bard wrote:
> Yes, that is reasonable. Let us call it "real_nth_root" instead, as
> suggested by Nicolas Thiery. Any other requests/comments?
it's better talk about "n-ic" root rather than "n-th" root, IMHO.
>
> It would be superb if this could be resolved by June 30th, w
William Stein gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> Is there a way to create a local mirror of all of pypi?
One can use the bandersnatch package for this:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/bandersnatch
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubsc
Yes, that is reasonable. Let us call it "real_nth_root" instead, as
suggested by Nicolas Thiery. Any other requests/comments?
It would be superb if this could be resolved by June 30th, when my
book goes to the American Mathematical Society for publication...
---Greg
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 9:02 A
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 1:26 AM, Craig E Larson wrote:
> hi,
>
> can you add washington.edu to the whitelist?
No.
> i use local copies of sage in my projects so i can add my own packages. i
> download them from:
>
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/sagemath/sage-mirror/linux/64bit/
However
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 06:33:52PM -0700, Gregory Bard wrote:
>> It seems that the consensus on both Sage-devel and Sage-edu is to go
>> with some sort of nth_real_root function. I propose the following,
>> which I have tested for evaluat
Hi Travis,
On 2014-06-22, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
> Now startup a new session:
>
> sage: SGA4 = SymmetricGroupAlgebra(QQ, 4)
> sage: SGA3 = SymmetricGroupAlgebra(QQ, 3)
> sage: SGA3.has_coerce_map_from(SGA4)
> False
> sage: lift = SGA4.module_morphism(lambda x: SGA3.zero(), codomain=SGA3)
> sage:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 06:33:52PM -0700, Gregory Bard wrote:
> It seems that the consensus on both Sage-devel and Sage-edu is to go
> with some sort of nth_real_root function. I propose the following,
> which I have tested for evaluation, plotting, differentiation, and
> integration. Sadly, the de
Hey everyone,
Currently we have the following behavior in Sage. This is okay:
sage: SGA4 = SymmetricGroupAlgebra(QQ, 4)
sage: SGA3 = SymmetricGroupAlgebra(QQ, 3)
sage: lift = SGA4.module_morphism(lambda x: SGA3.zero(), codomain=SGA3)
sage: SGA3.register_coercion(lift)
Now startup a new sessio
17 matches
Mail list logo
