It seems that the consensus on both Sage-devel and Sage-edu is to go
with some sort of nth_real_root function. I propose the following,
which I have tested for evaluation, plotting, differentiation, and
integration. Sadly, the derivative has a Dirac delta in it, which is
... perhaps unavoidable bec
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Cool ! I will give it another try.
Thanks.
> Does it work even when not fed with a list of tickets to review ?
Yes.
> I plan on installing it on a machine that is meant to check the tickets in
> needs_review.
That's what it does.
FWIW,
Very strange error:
time $SAGE_ROOT/sage -c ''
sh: 1: time: not found
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> After hours of computations and fight all I get is a "plugin failed" error.
>
> http://patchbot.sagemath.org/log/0/debian/jessie/sid/x86_64/3.14-1-amd64/silence/2014-06-
I created http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16504 for this
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this g
On 2014-06-20, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Consider:
>
> sage: p = MixedIntegerLinearProgram()
> sage: x = p.new_variable(nonnegative=False)
>
> /usr/local/src/sage-git/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/IPython/core/interactiveshell.py:2834:
>
> DeprecationWarning: The default behaviour of new_varia
Consider:
sage: p = MixedIntegerLinearProgram()
sage: x = p.new_variable(nonnegative=False)
/usr/local/src/sage-git/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/IPython/core/interactiveshell.py:2834:
DeprecationWarning: The default behaviour of new_variable() will soon
change ! It will return 'real' vari
After hours of computations and fight all I get is a "plugin failed" error.
http://patchbot.sagemath.org/log/0/debian/jessie/sid/x86_64/3.14-1-amd64/silence/2014-06-20%2015:16:25%20+0200?plugin=plugins.startup_modules
Nathann
On 20 June 2014 14:52, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> It seems to run fine af
It seems to run fine after some fighting...
1) Is there a way to see the list of patchbot running ?
2) Is there a way to see the list of reports that my patchbot submitted ?
3) Why does it use 3 processors when I have 4 available ?
Thanks,
Nathann
On 20 June 2014 12:58, Nathann Cohen wrote:
Cool ! I will give it another try.
Does it work even when not fed with a list of tickets to review ?
I plan on installing it on a machine that is meant to check the tickets in
needs_review.
Nathann
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" gro
