On 2014-05-30, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, May 30, 2014 2:19:24 AM UTC-4, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>>
>> If I understand your complaint correctly, the problem is that
>>> re-compiling after switching branches is too expensive.
>>>
>>
>> You *NEVER* need to recompile everything when switching br
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/imperfection-isnt-oppression.html
Something to add to the README / online docs... ? ;-)
-leif
--
() The ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/\ Help Cure HTML E-Mail
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscr
On 2014-05-30, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
>>
>> If I understand your complaint correctly, the problem is that
>> re-compiling after switching branches is too expensive.
>>
>
> You *NEVER* need to recompile everything when switching branches. There is
> a trick : you should never checkout a branch b
>
> What I find particularly interesting is that they went to OSS fairly
> early, but of course it relies on proprietary underneath with Matlab;
> they're open-sourcing everything they can, and of course Matlab is pretty
> available compared to other programs
>
For my Master's project I wrote
Yes, that is my point. I just mentioned this as a quick way to show a
plain, clear and direct use case. I didn't want to pick a more exciting and
speculative one.
Paul
Paul-Olivier Dehaye
SNF Assistant Professor of Mathematics
University of Zurich
skype: lokami_lokami (preferred)
phone: +41 76 407
Just got a Github Education account today for my lab, which led me to look
a bit more at their site. This video is relevant:
https://education.github.com/stories#UCBerkeley
> If extra eyes were all that were necessary, there would be no
long-standing mathematical conjectures.
What is needed is bot
On 30 May 2014 17:42, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:11 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>> Interesting project I was just made aware of. Anyone (say, anyone at
>> Oxford...) know more?
>>
>> http://www2.maths.ox.ac.uk/chebfun/about/
>>
>> What I find particularly interesting is that they w
>
> I expressed disappointment by their reliance on Matlab, and especially
> that they use core language features of Matlab that evidently not
> available in Octave (at least at the time).
>
>
Though another opinion a Sage dev who shall remain nameless gave is "From
my experience, Octave is wa
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:11 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> Interesting project I was just made aware of. Anyone (say, anyone at
> Oxford...) know more?
>
> http://www2.maths.ox.ac.uk/chebfun/about/
>
> What I find particularly interesting is that they went to OSS fairly early,
> but of course it relies o
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:28:58PM +0200, Paul-Olivier Dehaye wrote:
>"""
>E.g. when a
> borderline feature is meaningful in the context of Sage, is useful
> for a sister project, but does not yet have a direct use case
> within Sage ...
>"""
>Correct me if I am wrong
>
> Hmm, I was kind of going on the "avoid unnecessary merges" thing.
>>
>
> You can of course do whatever you want on your computer as long as you
> don't upload it...
>
>
Right, but the problem is that currently I am uploading it ;-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
I have heard talks about this from Trevethen, and one of his students
gave a talk about it at the Sage-Flint days in Warwick a few years
ago.
John
On 30 May 2014 17:11, kcrisman wrote:
> Interesting project I was just made aware of. Anyone (say, anyone at
> Oxford...) know more?
>
> http://www2
Interesting project I was just made aware of. Anyone (say, anyone at
Oxford...) know more?
http://www2.maths.ox.ac.uk/chebfun/about/
What I find particularly interesting is that they went to OSS fairly early,
but of course it relies on proprietary underneath with Matlab; they're
open-sourcing
On 30 May 2014 14:29, kcrisman wrote:
>> > which reminds me to remind people to submit to this if they have
>> > something!
>>
>> I am duly reminded, and have a contribution to make, but on that page
>> it says to contact
>> Minh Van Nguyen
>> -- is he still doing this?
>>
>
> John, I believe so!
On Friday, May 30, 2014 1:18:43 PM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote:
>
> Hmm, I was kind of going on the "avoid unnecessary merges" thing.
>
You can of course do whatever you want on your computer as long as you
don't upload it...
Also I am scared about merge conflicts, which I do not know how to handle
>
> > which reminds me to remind people to submit to this if they have
> something!
>
> I am duly reminded, and have a contribution to make, but on that page
> it says to contact
> Minh Van Nguyen
> -- is he still doing this?
>
>
John, I believe so! I think that is the Sage contribution he
On 30 May 2014 13:23, kcrisman wrote:
> Dear Hilbert/fresh man,
>>
>> BTW:If there some cool cases that solve problem with sage,please tell me.
>
>
> Again, not sure what you mean, but
> http://www.sagemath.org/library-publications.html is a good place to start -
> which reminds me to remind peop
Dear Hilbert/fresh man,
In my opinion,the packages of matlab are more important than matlab itself.
> So I wonder if there is any packages of sage,like an implement of some
> simulation models.
> And if I want to write some packages of sage,waht format should I use,
> *.sage or *.py?
>
>
Yes, R
On Friday, May 30, 2014 2:19:24 AM UTC-4, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
> If I understand your complaint correctly, the problem is that
>> re-compiling after switching branches is too expensive.
>>
>
> You *NEVER* need to recompile everything when switching branches. There is
> a trick : you should n
#16101: Python backend for Polyhedra
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16101
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.co
On Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:42:43 AM UTC+2, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>
> It is possible that the /tmp installation is broken anyway. With
> setuptools-3.6
> I get 4 out of 4 failures because some paths point back to the original
> sage/
> directory, but some not and the underlying files are not there
21 matches
Mail list logo
