Hi Martin,
Here is two examples using multivariate quotients and extension fields
which should be faster than computing CyclotomicField(m) or
NumberField(cyclotomic(m), 'r') :
m = 3*5*7
pi = prime_factors(m)
Qi = PolynomialRing(QQ, len(pi), 'q')
Idl = [cyclotomic_polynomial(p, 'q'+str(i)) for (
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Jean-Baptiste Priez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know what is the new line which is equivalent to
>
> %load_ext sage.misc.sage_extension
>>
>
> with sage 6.2?
>
%load_ext sage
should now work.
>
> The ticket #16050 (I think...) moved some code so...
>
>
Hello,
I would like to know what is the new line which is equivalent to
%load_ext sage.misc.sage_extension
>
with sage 6.2?
The ticket #16050 (I think...) moved some code so...
Cheers,
Jean-Baptiste Priez
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sag
I just tried to run:
sage: m = random_prime(10^5)
sage: K. = CyclotomicField(m)
and I ran out of RAM! Doing a smaller example:
sage: m = random_prime(10^4)
sage: %prun K. = CyclotomicField(m)
puts
sage.rings.number_field.number_field_morphisms.create_embedding_from_approx
as the most expensi
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> On Monday, April 28, 2014 5:38:39 PM UTC+1, William wrote:
>>
>> But then you have to convert to a different type first, e.g.,
>> list(sorted(x.items())), right?
>
>
> Output is a json string.
Oh, I see. Thanks for the clarification.
>
>
>
On Monday, April 28, 2014 5:38:39 PM UTC+1, William wrote:
>
> But then you have to convert to a different type first, e.g.,
> list(sorted(x.items())), right?
>
Output is a json string.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsub
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> On Monday, April 28, 2014 5:26:43 PM UTC+1, William wrote:
>>
>> is clearly broken -- you can't test dictionaries for equality textual.
>
>
> you can if you sort the keys.
But then you have to convert to a different type first, e.g.,
list(sor
On Monday, April 28, 2014 5:26:43 PM UTC+1, William wrote:
>
> is clearly broken -- you can't test dictionaries for equality textual.
>
you can if you sort the keys.
You have simplejson installed which is not default, and it apparently uses
a different sort order than json.
--
You received th
I was a bit surprised to see this doctest failure -- first pleasantly
(?) surprised to see
local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sagenb-0.10.8.2-py2.7.egg/sagenb/notebook/misc.py
getting mixed in with all the other tests, and second, the test itself
is clearly broken -- you can't test dictionaries for
Does your compile always fail in different places with different errors?
Maybe its more relevant to look at the output of "diskutil info /" and/or
install smartmontools...
On Monday, April 28, 2014 4:02:39 PM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> ld: symbol dyld_stub_binding_helper not found, normall
ld: symbol dyld_stub_binding_helper not found, normally in
crt1.o/dylib1.o/bundle1.o for architecture x86_64
fatal error: libtool: internal link edit command failed
sounds like your gcc install is hosed. Post the full log, not just the
singular log.
--
You received this message because you are
>>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> Who takes care of sagenb.org nowadays?
> >>> e.g. maintenance and security?
> >>
> >> Jason Grout took care of it for the last few years. He posted that he
> >> will not be able to take care of it (and also
> >> http://sagecell.sagemath.org/) recently, and asked for vol
So it works. Your real error is elsewhere. Run "make distclean && make -j1"
On Monday, April 28, 2014 2:55:53 PM UTC+1, Andrew wrote:
>
> On Monday, 28 April 2014 23:49:47 UTC+10, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> whats the output of "xcrun -v strip"
>>
>
> xcrun: note: PATH =
> '/Users/andrew/bin:/Libr
On Monday, 28 April 2014 10:41:20 UTC+1, John Cremona wrote:
>
> Let's think about what users actually want when they call for the Galois
> Group of a (possibly non-Galois) number field K. First of all, they might
> want to know whether or not K is Galois itself;
>
this is basically comparin
On Monday, 28 April 2014 23:49:47 UTC+10, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> whats the output of "xcrun -v strip"
>
xcrun: note: PATH =
'/Users/andrew/bin:/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin:/bin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/texbin:/usr/local/bin'
xcrun: note: SDKROOT
whats the output of "xcrun -v strip"
On Monday, April 28, 2014 2:40:54 PM UTC+1, Andrew wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, 28 April 2014 22:20:28 UTC+10, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, April 28, 2014 10:53:53 AM UTC+1, Andrew wrote:
>>>
>>> Here's another bizarre feature:
>>>
>>> 538-6.1.1-master-s
On Monday, 28 April 2014 22:20:28 UTC+10, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> On Monday, April 28, 2014 10:53:53 AM UTC+1, Andrew wrote:
>>
>> Here's another bizarre feature:
>>
>> 538-6.1.1-master-sage: /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin
>> /xcodebuild -sdk / -find strip 2> /dev/null
>> /Ap
Well if every release was tagged one could simply
point sage -I to the URL of the tarball that is automagically
created by github.
On 28 Apr 2014 12:11, "Volker Braun" wrote:
> Whats the recommended way for running the git version of the patchbot?
> Just installing it manually? Maybe there is a b
On Monday, April 28, 2014 10:53:53 AM UTC+1, Andrew wrote:
>
> Here's another bizarre feature:
>
> 538-6.1.1-master-sage:
> /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/xcodebuild
> -sdk / -find strip 2> /dev/null
> /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.
> xcto
On Monday, 28 April 2014 20:09:53 UTC+10, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Whats xcodebuild -version
>
>
It's:
Xcode 5.1.1
Build version 5B1008
Andrew
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emai
Whats the recommended way for running the git version of the patchbot? Just
installing it manually? Maybe there is a better way?
On Monday, April 28, 2014 7:17:08 AM UTC+1, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>
> Several branches needing review and merging fine get an "ApplyFailed"
> ticket by
> patchbot run
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13422
On Saturday, April 26, 2014 3:17:00 PM UTC-7, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> If we try to plot some values in sage on a loglog scale where there will
> be fewer than 2 ticks on the (say) x-axis, it throws a ValueError:
>
> ValueError: Either expand the range
Whats xcodebuild -version
On Monday, April 28, 2014 10:53:53 AM UTC+1, Andrew wrote:
>
> Here's another bizarre feature:
>
> 538-6.1.1-master-sage:
> /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/xcodebuild
> -sdk / -find strip 2> /dev/null
> /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Tool
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13422
On Saturday, April 26, 2014 3:17:00 PM UTC-7, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> If we try to plot some values in sage on a loglog scale where there will
> be fewer than 2 ticks on the (say) x-axis, it throws a ValueError:
>
> ValueError: Either expand the ran
On Monday, April 28, 2014 1:44:01 AM UTC+1, William wrote:
>
> Taken in the extreme, you seem to be suggesting that, e.g., "pip
> install foo" can't be taken seriously
Pip doesn't import foo before modifying it, so it is safe.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog
Here's another bizarre feature:
538-6.1.1-master-sage:
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/xcodebuild
-sdk / -find strip 2> /dev/null
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.
xctoolchain/usr/bin/strip\539-6.1.1-master-sage: ls -l /Applications/Xcode.
ap
Yes I have strip and the command line tools:
533-6.1.1-master-sage: which strip
strip is /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin/strip
strip is /usr/bin/strip
On Monday, 28 April 2014 16:28:16 UTC+10, yomcat wrote:
>
> On 28/04/2014, at 1809, Andrew > wrote:
> >
> > sh: line 1: 45940 Tra
Let's think about what users actually want when they call for the Galois
Group of a (possibly non-Galois) number field K. First of all, they might
want to know whether or not K is Galois itself; then they may want the
Galois group of the closure and the closure itself; about the group, they
may o
On 2014-04-28, Rob Beezer wrote:
> The groups are isomorphic:
>
> sage: K. = NumberField(x^4 - 2)
> sage: G1 = K.galois_group(names='bbb')
> sage: G2 = K.galois_group(type="gap",names='bbb').group()
> sage: G1.is_isomorphic(G2)
> True
>
> but
>
> sage: K.galois_closure(names="ccc")
> Number Field
Okay, I just installed a more recent version of the patchbot as it seems
that "sage -i patchbot" installs an old one, and here is the new result :
patchbot@silence:~/sage$ ./sage -patchbot
Getting trusted author list...
WARNING: Assuming sage-main is pristine.
WARNING: Do not use this copy o
Yo !!!
> Several branches needing review and merging fine get an "ApplyFailed"
> ticket by
> patchbot runners (many thanks for the service BTW). This is due to
>
> https://github.com/robertwb/sage-patchbot/issues/10
>
> where there are workarounds. So please if you run a patchb
31 matches
Mail list logo
