Maybe it should be Igotcha. Microsoft has agreed to implement fork() in Windows
8.2
On 3/31/2014 8:06 PM, Tom Boothby wrote:
> had me right until the point I saw "as of today (1/4)."...
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:56 PM, François Bissey
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 19:55:47 Stephen Kauffma
>
>
> > > Have you checked your calendar? New Zealand is quiet on that
> tradition.
> > > It is almost 1pm and that's the first one of the day for me.
> > >
> > > Francois
> >
> > It's still the 31st here...
> Timezone fun. From when this was posted I'd say Bill is in London.
>
>
Almost as
had me right until the point I saw "as of today (1/4)."...
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:56 PM, François Bissey
wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 19:55:47 Stephen Kauffman wrote:
>> On 3/31/2014 7:53 PM, François Bissey wrote:
>> > On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 19:50:30 Stephen Kauffman wrote:
>> >> On 3/31/2014 7:
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 19:55:47 Stephen Kauffman wrote:
> On 3/31/2014 7:53 PM, François Bissey wrote:
> > On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 19:50:30 Stephen Kauffman wrote:
> >> On 3/31/2014 7:29 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> By now everyone will have heard about Canonical's new product, called
>
On 3/31/2014 7:53 PM, François Bissey wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 19:50:30 Stephen Kauffman wrote:
>> On 3/31/2014 7:29 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> By now everyone will have heard about Canonical's new product, called
>>> Youbetcha...
>>
>> I can't find this at ubuntu.com or with any
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 19:50:30 Stephen Kauffman wrote:
> On 3/31/2014 7:29 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > By now everyone will have heard about Canonical's new product, called
> > Youbetcha...
>
> I can't find this at ubuntu.com or with any combo of "Youbetcha" "Canonical"
> "Linux" on go
On 3/31/2014 7:29 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> By now everyone will have heard about Canonical's new product, called
> Youbetcha...
I can't find this at ubuntu.com or with any combo of "Youbetcha" "Canonical"
"Linux" on google.
Is this for real?
--
You received this message because you a
Hi all,
By now everyone will have heard about Canonical's new product, called
Youbetcha, which claims to offer native support for Linux applications in
Windows *at native speed*.
I wish this had come along earlier, since even yesterday (Monday), I was
spitting chips at the 45 minutes it takes jus
On Monday, March 31, 2014 5:52:34 PM UTC+2, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
>
> Everything in .libs in that directory is 64-bit except dummy.o. Oops.
>> In src/cxx/.libs, everything is 32-bit, so I guess the basic problem is
>> that the -m64 just isn't making it into CXXFLAGS.
>>
>> I would say t
Hello !!
> I think a discussion about what to do with the "constructions" document in
> general would be good, as it's not the first time that
> outdated-but-still-doctested-so-works stuff there has confused people.
Yepyep. Maybe we should remove those that we feel are too outdated or
unhelpful,
On Monday, March 31, 2014 5:40:56 PM UTC+2, Rob McMahon wrote:
>
> On 30/03/2014 13:56, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
> >
> > It would be nice to confirm a 64 bit build is working.
> > Just set SAGE64=yes and rebuild everything.
> > As far as I remember, the only package not taking this env var in
On 30/03/2014 13:56, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
It would be nice to confirm a 64 bit build is working.
Just set SAGE64=yes and rebuild everything.
As far as I remember, the only package not taking this env var into
account was the GCC spkg.
And ATLAS did not manage to use a priori good settings.
On Monday, March 31, 2014 9:11:09 AM UTC-4, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
> Hello everybody !
>
> Right now, when I type "graph theory sage" in Google the first answer is
> this :
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/doc/constructions/graph_theory.html
>
>
I think a discussion about what to do with the "cons
On Monday, March 31, 2014 4:23:31 PM UTC+2, Dr David Kirkby wrote:
>
> On 30 March 2014 13:56, Jean-Pierre Flori >
> wrote:
>
> > It would be nice to confirm a 64 bit build is working.
> > Just set SAGE64=yes and rebuild everything.
> > As far as I remember, the only package not taking this e
On Monday, March 31, 2014 4:01:38 PM UTC+2, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, March 31, 2014 3:43:18 PM UTC+2, Rob McMahon wrote:
>>
>> On 30/03/2014 13:56, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>> >
>> > It would be nice to confirm a 64 bit build is working.
>> > Just set SAGE64=yes and rebuild
On 30 March 2014 13:56, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
> It would be nice to confirm a 64 bit build is working.
> Just set SAGE64=yes and rebuild everything.
> As far as I remember, the only package not taking this env var into account
> was the GCC spkg.
> And ATLAS did not manage to use a priori good
On Monday, March 31, 2014 3:43:18 PM UTC+2, Rob McMahon wrote:
>
> On 30/03/2014 13:56, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
> >
> > It would be nice to confirm a 64 bit build is working.
> > Just set SAGE64=yes and rebuild everything.
> > As far as I remember, the only package not taking this env var in
On 30/03/2014 13:56, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
It would be nice to confirm a 64 bit build is working.
Just set SAGE64=yes and rebuild everything.
As far as I remember, the only package not taking this env var into
account was the GCC spkg.
And ATLAS did not manage to use a priori good settings.
Hello everybody !
Right now, when I type "graph theory sage" in Google the first answer is this :
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/constructions/graph_theory.html
Now it does not say much at all, we don't use networkX much anymore,
and it is not a very good introduction to graphs with Sage. What woul
On Friday, March 21, 2014 9:31:40 PM UTC+1, Evan Oman wrote:
>
> Alright here is the latest error after running the -b version of build,
> doesn't mention any dll's but is it the same issue?
>
> Compiling sage/ext/interpreters/wrapper_el.pyx because it changed.
> Cythonizing sage/algebras/lette
20 matches
Mail list logo
