Re: [sage-devel] Re: Ticket 15003

2014-02-17 Thread Amit Jamadagni
Hello, A review on the ticket would be great http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15003. Thanks. On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Amit Jamadagni wrote: > Hello, > I have tried to resolve the issue. Any comments would be helpful. > Thanks. > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Volker Bra

[sage-devel] Re: systemd and trac #381

2014-02-17 Thread Volker Braun
I had some troubles running the buildbot slave through systemd. You service will be selinux confined and some doctests with external programs fail on Fedora 20. Nothing particularly important afair. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group

[sage-devel] Re: systemd and trac #381

2014-02-17 Thread Jason Grout
On 2/17/14 11:09 AM, William Stein wrote: On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Jason Grout wrote: On 2/15/14 11:44 PM, Henry de Valence wrote: This approach requires systemd and is Linux-specific, but as every major Linux distribution is either using systemd now or plans to move to it in the futu

Re: [sage-devel] Re: systemd and trac #381

2014-02-17 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 2/15/14 11:44 PM, Henry de Valence wrote: >> >> This approach requires systemd and is Linux-specific, but as every major >> Linux distribution is either using systemd now or plans to move to it in >> the future, it seems like it might be wor

[sage-devel] Re: systemd and trac #381

2014-02-17 Thread Jason Grout
On 2/15/14 11:44 PM, Henry de Valence wrote: This approach requires systemd and is Linux-specific, but as every major Linux distribution is either using systemd now or plans to move to it in the future, it seems like it might be worthwhile for Sage to ship systemd .service files for Linux users.

[sage-devel] Re: systemd and trac #381

2014-02-17 Thread Keshav Kini
Henry de Valence writes: > Hi all, > > while looking at the SAGE FAQ here [1], I noticed the link to Trac #381 [2] > (the link is broken, on the FAQ page, though). > > One option which is not mentioned, but which is extremely convenient, > is to run Sage using a systemd user session. The Arch Linu

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Issue With Implementation of Gamma Function

2014-02-17 Thread Zimmermann Paul
Hi Jori, > Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:56:56 +0200 (EET) > From: Jori Mantysalo >=20 > On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Zimmermann Paul wrote: >=20 > > On my computer, computing gamma(Pi^2) to 1 bits takes about 1.4s (f= or the > > first computation, when Bernoulli numbers are not cached) instead of

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Issue With Implementation of Gamma Function

2014-02-17 Thread Jori Mantysalo
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Zimmermann Paul wrote: On my computer, computing gamma(Pi^2) to 1 bits takes about 1.4s (for the first computation, when Bernoulli numbers are not cached) instead of 6.1s with Pari/GP. Out of curiosity: How this compares to, for example, Mathematica? -- Jori Mäntysalo

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Issue With Implementation of Gamma Function

2014-02-17 Thread Zimmermann Paul
a last update: MPFR now uses the Von Staudt=E2=80=93Clausen theorem to comp= ute Bernoulli numbers (thanks to Fredrik Johansson for pointing out this formul= a). On my computer, computing gamma(Pi^2) to 1 bits takes about 1.4s (for t= he first computation, when Bernoulli numbers are not cached)