Hi William,
Zitat von William Stein :
2. Another broken package is
p_group_cohomology
which doesn't build:
pGroupCohomology/resolution.pxd:21:0: 'interrupt.pxi' not found
I don't know a fix.
I do, and it ''is'' fixed: See
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/SimonKing/Cohomolo
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 10:36 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to raise awareness (and apologize) that the
> re-organization of the layout of Sage broke so many optional spkg's.
> In case people run into similar problems, here's what I'm doing to
> workaround this mess for sage-6.2
Hi,
I just wanted to raise awareness (and apologize) that the
re-organization of the layout of Sage broke so many optional spkg's.
In case people run into similar problems, here's what I'm doing to
workaround this mess for sage-6.2 in SageMathCloud.
1. These databases are broken:
cunningham_tabl
On 2/1/14 9:33 PM, William Stein wrote:
Hi,
I think we should include pip with Sage. It's now the standard Python
package manager, and anybody using Sage now should always do this with
their new Sage install, so they can install/upgrade/remove(!)/etc.,
packages.
wget https://raw.github.co
Hi,
I think we should include pip with Sage. It's now the standard Python
package manager, and anybody using Sage now should always do this with
their new Sage install, so they can install/upgrade/remove(!)/etc.,
packages.
wget https://raw.github.com/pypa/pip/master/contrib/get-pip.py
./
On 2014-02-01, cl...@jhcloos.com wrote:
> Dima Pasechnik writes:
>
>> and the output inserted by Maxima on ARM:
>> (%i1) elliptic_e(0.5, 0.1);
>> (%o1) .4980113944988315
>> as compared to x86_64:
>> (%i1) elliptic_e(0.5, 0.1);
>> (%o1) .49801139449
On 02/01/2014 10:14 PM, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
Hi,
I've just made a fresh install of Sage 6.1 from the sources (via git
clone) and noticed that LaTeX formulas in the notebook are not rendered
by Mathjax: they remain between $ symbols, as they have been typed. This
regards LaTeX formulas typed a
Dima Pasechnik writes:
> and the output inserted by Maxima on ARM:
> (%i1) elliptic_e(0.5, 0.1);
> (%o1) .4980113944988315
> as compared to x86_64:
> (%i1) elliptic_e(0.5, 0.1);
> (%o1) .49801139449883153
FWIW, maxima compiled with sbcl on amd64 a
There are many open-source FEM packages which are good in one thing but bad
in another.
So a good thing to do would be to make a package which uses the accurate
parts of each single FEM -package.
Are there any plans to include some good code of finite element packages in
Sage?
--
You received
On 02/01/2014 11:56 PM, P Purkayastha wrote:
Thanks for the report. I have opened an issue in sagenb [1]. It's
puzzling since I didn't see this during the 6.1.beta* versions.
[1] https://github.com/sagemath/sagenb/issues/195
sagenb-0.10.8 (the latest sagenb) + sage-6.1.beta4 works fine. So, th
Thanks for the report. I have opened an issue in sagenb [1]. It's
puzzling since I didn't see this during the 6.1.beta* versions.
[1] https://github.com/sagemath/sagenb/issues/195
On 02/01/2014 10:14 PM, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
Hi,
I've just made a fresh install of Sage 6.1 from the sources (
Hi,
I've just made a fresh install of Sage 6.1 from the sources (via git clone)
and noticed that LaTeX formulas in the notebook are not rendered by
Mathjax: they remain between $ symbols, as they have been typed. This
regards LaTeX formulas typed as comments in the text between the cells, not
12 matches
Mail list logo
