[sage-devel] Re: Git reviewing help needed

On 01/30/2014 09:42 AM, kcrisman wrote: Volker's last thing makes a lot more sense. What I want to do is to get back to the "master" or "develop" from there with "sage -dev checkout" but I guess I need to already have known about the "--branch" parameter $ ./sage -dev checkout --branch master O

[sage-devel] Re: Git reviewing help needed

> > > > > > > > Unfortunately, the simple syntax didn't work. Maybe I have to do > > something else so it knows what "develop" is? But that isn't in the > doc. > > 1. What command are you running? > > Volker's last thing makes a lot more sense. What I want to do is to get back to the "ma

[sage-devel] Re: upcoming Sage Days

Sage Days 57 are now April 5-12, 2014 and have a webpage at http://wiki.sagemath.org/days57 Samuel Lelièvre William Stein wrote: > > Here are some upcoming Sage Days workshops, which I just added numbers > for. The dates of some are tentative. If *you're* interested in > going to one, let m

Re: [sage-devel] Using sage as a CGI

Done! I set the HOME variable in the apache2 conf file and then gave the permissions to /var/www. Thanks for the help Jeroen! On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 5:10:28 PM UTC-6, Pedro Fernando Morales-Almazan wrote: > > Yes, I was just checking that. I changed and it tried to run SAGE, not the >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: md5 of sage-6.0.tar.gz

If it is just one of those things (and maybe my fault), then it is OK. Just checking it is not a new policy or something. On 01/29/2014 05:03 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > I'm pretty sure that we haven't changed the source tarball since its > release on 2013-12-18. Are you sure not one of your downlo

Re: [sage-devel] Using sage as a CGI

Yes, I was just checking that. I changed and it tried to run SAGE, not the issue is some permission error. I'm trying to fix it right now. On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 4:10:30 PM UTC-6, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > I think the answer is here: > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/env.html > > Sage

[sage-devel] Re: md5 of sage-6.0.tar.gz

I'm pretty sure that we haven't changed the source tarball since its release on 2013-12-18. Are you sure not one of your downloads is corrupted/truncated? E.g. do they both decompress without errors? As far as I know we have never modified a source tarball after its release. The correct md5sum

[sage-devel] md5 of sage-6.0.tar.gz

I downloaded sage-6.0.tar.gz a few days ago, and again recently. The md5 numbers of the file had changed. Was this a one time occurrence, or is it part of the way distributions are distributed that the tarballs change once in a while? If the latter, this will be very hard for me, because I am ma

Re: [sage-devel] Boost Python (and enumeration of short vectors)

Hi, On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:50:49PM -0800, Martin Raum wrote: > It's about QuadraticForm(...).short_vector_list_up_to_length(l), which > finds all vectors of length less than l. As opposed to fpLLL, which > approximates a basis of short vectors. The same guy who wrote fpLLL > implemented enu

Re: [sage-devel] Using sage as a CGI

I think the answer is here: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/env.html Sage requires the environment variable HOME to be set because it needs the DOT_SAGE directory which is set to $HOME/.sage by default. And I think some other packages also look in $HOME for certain things. To avoid breakage,

[sage-devel] Using sage as a CGI

I am trying to use SAGE for a cgi script but I have this error when running the cgi from the browser: Error: environment variable $HOME is not set., referer: http://mysite.com/foo.cgi Error setting environment variables by sourcing '/usr/local/sage-6.0-x86_64-Linux/src/bin/sage-env';, referer:

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Git reviewing help needed

We can't really tell you what you want to do after you are finished with your task... maybe go and make a sandwich, drink a cup of tea? ;-) Usually you'd want to switch to whatever you were doing before. Annoyingly, the "sage -dev checkout" doesn't DWIM but expects you to add additional mandat

[sage-devel] Re: Git reviewing help needed

On 01/29/2014 11:36 PM, kcrisman wrote: > Oh, and it's not clear to me > from http://sagemath.org/doc/developer/walk_through.html#reviewing what > to do when I'm *done* reviewing! I guess one "checks out mas

Re: [sage-devel] Boost Python (and enumeration of short vectors)

I am interested! See also #14868. John On 29 January 2014 13:35, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2014-01-29 10:26, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> >> Yes, it is unbearably slow. But not because of PARI itself, only because >> of the Sage interface. Luckily, fixing that is easy. > > > If anybody cares, this

[sage-devel] Re: Git reviewing help needed

> > > > > Oh, and it's not clear to me > > from http://sagemath.org/doc/developer/walk_through.html#reviewing what > > to do when I'm *done* reviewing! I guess one "checks out master" but > > that is just something I sort of got through osmosis and I don't know if > > it's right, nor the sage

[sage-devel] L-function and Mod. form db...

See http://ask.sagemath.org/question/3467/ I don't even get an error message, it just never loads. However, Google does have a cache of it from a week or two ago. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group an

Re: [sage-devel] Boost Python (and enumeration of short vectors)

On 2014-01-29 10:26, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: Yes, it is unbearably slow. But not because of PARI itself, only because of the Sage interface. Luckily, fixing that is easy. If anybody cares, this is http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15760 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to th

Re: [sage-devel] Boost Python (and enumeration of short vectors)

On 2014-01-28 16:04, Martin Raum wrote: Hi all: You might or might not know that the current implementation of short vectors for quadratic forms (aka lattices) is, say, unreliable. Can you please elaborate what you mean with "unreliable" (i.e. an example where it goes wrong). We are using PA

Re: [sage-devel] Boost Python (and enumeration of short vectors)

This is now #15758 , for all those who want to have a look. Am Mittwoch, 29. Januar 2014 08:50:49 UTC+1 schrieb Martin Raum: > > It's about QuadraticForm(...).short_vector_list_up_to_length(l), which > finds all vectors of length less than l. As opposed to