[sage-devel] Re: Error in installing gd-2.0.35 for Sage 6.0, released 2013-12-17, on OSX 10.9.1

It might help to post the whole log file described in the error message. Do you have fontconfig installed? John On Saturday, January 25, 2014 10:24:26 PM UTC-8, Sami Losoi wrote: > > The same error seems to persists although the building process took this > time significant more time. > I run

[sage-devel] Re: Error in installing gd-2.0.35 for Sage 6.0, released 2013-12-17, on OSX 10.9.1

The same error seems to persists although the building process took this time significant more time. I run just "make" with Sage 6.1 rc0 on OSX 10.9.1 and got lastly logs like this: http://pastebin.com/mV1Cxqvj The same log message here: Error installing package gd-2.0.35.p7 On Saturday, 25

[sage-devel] Unssuccessful run on OSX 10.9.1 with Sage 6.0 Notebook

I run import numpy as np import matplotlib.pyplot as plt import scipy.io val = 0. # this is the value where you want the data to appear on the y-axis. ar = np.arange(10) # just as an example array plt.plot(ar, np.zeros_like(ar) + val, 'x') plt.show() and the notebook visualises nothing, in contr

Re: [sage-devel] Re: upcoming Sage Days

I could only come out to the first two-ish days of the Bug Days since it conflicts with the Stanley birthday conference (June 23-27) and FPSAC (June 29-July 3). Best, Travis -- You received this message

Re: [sage-devel] Re: upcoming Sage Days

Le samedi 25 janvier 2014 06:25:30 UTC+1, Andrey Novoseltsev a écrit : > > On Friday, 24 January 2014 09:23:38 UTC-7, William wrote: >> >> >> Also, John Hoebing asked: "When are we going to have a Sage >> Differential Geometry Days?" >> How many people are interested? Maybe do that as part of S

[sage-devel] Re: Error in installing gd-2.0.35 for Sage 6.0, released 2013-12-17, on OSX 10.9.1

Try 6.1.rc0 and let us know if the error persists. On Saturday, January 25, 2014 9:42:18 AM UTC, Sami Losoi wrote: > > I run **make test** and **make**: > http://pastebin.com/wPDpqAmJ > > What is the correct way of debugging this? > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to t

[sage-devel] Error in installing gd-2.0.35 for Sage 6.0, released 2013-12-17, on OSX 10.9.1

I run **make test** and **make**: http://pastebin.com/wPDpqAmJ What is the correct way of debugging this? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-dev

Re: [sage-devel] Re: class LinearRecurrence

I have the ore_algebra package now. I'm not satisfied with its interface, nor with that of LSFR or its services. The guess() and random_object() methods of my proposed class indeed do not belong to such an object. That's why they are declared @static_method. Yes, we need to avoid code duplication

[sage-devel] Re: class LinearRecurrence

One more remark: there is also a basic implementation of linear recurrences with constant coefficients in sage.crypto.lfsr... -- Marc -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

[sage-devel] Re: Re: class LinearRecurrence

Ralf Stephan wrote: > I'm leaning towards the operator kind of recurrence because I > definitely don't think about it as a sequence with specific length. > But the core object really is the ogf, i.e. the polynomial fraction > which defines everything in the same sense special function > expressions

[sage-devel] Re: git-annex (was: Git reviewing help needed)

Volker Braun wrote: > Also, git annex is written in Haskell... want to make that a Sage > dependency? No, I don't! I'm certainly not saying that git-annex should be required by Sage. I do believe it could be convenient for developers, and I thought the idea was worth mentioning in case someone e

[sage-devel] Re: Re: class LinearRecurrence

Ralf Stephan wrote: > Looking forward to ore_algebra. If that package link were available > now I would start using it immediately, but the page was under > construction. The direct link that was posted to sage-devel a few month ago still seems valid: http://www.risc.jku.at/research/combinat/sof