Hi!
I was building Sage from scratch following the instructions on
http://wiki.sagemath.org/TentativeConventions
When I started Sage for the first time after running "make -j4", it says
The Sage installation tree has moved
from /mnt/local/king/SAGE/sage-git/SAGE_ROOT=/mnt/local/king/SAG
t
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 01:02:30PM -0500, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
> I do really think that this is the best of what can
> happen for Sage but I also think that we need an agreement of all Sage
> developers that spkg can not be patched...
actually, it's the other way around. if there were no patc
2013/11/10, Felix Salfelder :
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 04:56:58PM +0100, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
>> What actually surprises me is that Sage must build git at all. Wouldn't
>> it make sense to restrict build and development scripts to use features
>> of a git version number that is usually satisfied b
> The part of the log you paste is not long enough. I guess you need to
> install msgfmt which is not part of standard debain. The name of the
> package is gettext.
Thanks. I'd probably found that myself. But of course, that was not my
point.
> Does anybody know why git is a standard spkg ? It is
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 04:56:58PM +0100, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> What actually surprises me is that Sage must build git at all. Wouldn't
> it make sense to restrict build and development scripts to use features
> of a git version number that is usually satisfied by current major
> stable distributi
Hello all!
I was just wondering whether it could be a good idea to include ggplot
[1] with SAGE. What do you think about that? Was it already discussed once?
[1] https://github.com/yhat/ggplot/
Thanks a lot and Greetings
Ursin Solèr
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to th
Hi,
The part of the log you paste is not long enough. I guess you need to
install msgfmt which is not part of standard debain. The name of the
package is gettext.
Does anybody know why git is a standard spkg ? It is likely that
anybody has his/her own git...
Vincent
2013/11/10, Ralf Hemmecke :
Hello!
I've cloned from git://github.com/sagemath/sage.git
(094712a Merge in bug fixes for the dev scripts)
and typed "make" on a (relatively minimal) Debian 7 Installation.
I didn't know whether such a step would actually succeed, since I
haven't yet been able to find a description that such a s
Hi Nicolas,
On 2013-11-10, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> I am a bit confused, since Morphism already inherits from Element:
Yes, sorry, I meant to say: "ModuleElement".
> Anyway, I am going to widen a bit the scope of the discussion. On a
> similar note, we have a long waiting need for implementin
Hi!
after some years and finishing my Phd, I finally found some time and the
need to implement a new version of orthogonal polynomials.
Over the time I have many valuable lessons learned, and I now want to make
the whole development trough.
I posted a new patch on http://trac.sagemath.org/ticke
Hi!
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 09:47:08AM +, Simon King wrote:
> On 2013-11-08, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I was working with #15378 and I wondered why SchemeMorphism inherits
> > from Element and not from Morphism as they should.
>
> It *should* in fact inh
11 matches
Mail list logo
