On Saturday, November 2, 2013 10:34:10 AM UTC-7, vdelecroix wrote:
>
> I am working with number fields that I consider as subfields of RR.
RR doesn't coerce into AA (it really doesn't!), so specifying an embedding
of your numberfield in RR is not going to help in finding a coercion into
AA. You
You should never "from sage.all import *". For starters, that is already
imported in the doctest framework. The doctest framework might have
redefined something for doctesting purposes.
On Saturday, November 2, 2013 5:51:47 PM UTC, Pedro Cruz wrote:
>
> Dear Sage 5.12 developers,
>
> when usin
Dear Sage 5.12 developers,
when using
sage -docbuild pt/megua html
we are getting the right documentation of our module but in the middle (and
we believe is after this line):
from sage.all import *
we are getting documentation from functions like: "SetPartitionsAk(k)" ou "
SetPart
Hi,
I am working with number fields that I consider as subfields of RR. I
want (relatively fast) exact computations and at the same time being
able to compare elements for the order induced by RR (see for example
#13123 going in that direction). These fields are naturally embedded
in AA but it see
