Re: [sage-devel] Re: ATLAS build fails on Core i7-3770

2013-10-31 Thread Erik Massop
Dear list, On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:19:29 + (UTC) Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On 2013-10-30, Erik Massop wrote: > > This seems to be the bug 'scanf %f doesn't parse "0e+0" correctly' in > > glibc [1]. > > is it really a bug? I am not sure. Normally one should > have used %g format to read in a f

[sage-devel] Re: ATLAS build fails on Core i7-3770

2013-10-31 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2013-10-30, Erik Massop wrote: > Dear list, > > > This seems to be the bug 'scanf %f doesn't parse "0e+0" correctly' in > glibc [1]. is it really a bug? I am not sure. Normally one should have used %g format to read in a float in its "natural" format. There mustn't be a '+' in a fixed-point no

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Faster interval arithmetic

2013-10-31 Thread rjf
Oh dear, sounds like everyone has an opinion, not necessarily well informed though. Here are some facts/opinions. 1. If speed is an issue, you should use hardware floats. 2. On some (most?) processors, changing the rounding mode is more expensive than doing arithmetic. Sometimes MUCH more expensi