[sage-devel] Re: sage.bla.foo() does not always work in lazy_imported modules

2013-09-12 Thread Nils Bruin
On Thursday, September 12, 2013 10:35:10 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > With Sage 5.12.beta4, I see > > sage: delsarte_bound_additive_hamming_space(11,3,4,d_star=9) > Have you tried sage: delsarte_bound_additive_hamming_space? instead? It causes an unhandled SIGSEGV for me. -- You re

[sage-devel] sage.bla.foo() does not always work in lazy_imported modules

2013-09-12 Thread Dima Pasechnik
With Sage 5.12.beta4, I see sage: delsarte_bound_additive_hamming_space(11,3,4,d_star=9) --- NameError Traceback (most recent call last) in () > 1 delsarte_bound_additive_hamming_space(Int

[sage-devel] Re: SageManifolds v0.2

2013-09-12 Thread Volker Braun
The functionality looks very nice, but the user interface doesn't really feel right for Sage. I would recommend that you rely less on global procedures in the global namespace and more on factory methods. Besides following OOP, this lets users of your code explore features by tab-completion. Al

Re: [sage-devel] not trusted anymore ?

2013-09-12 Thread Christian Nassau
On 09/12/2013 02:17 PM, Frédéric Chapoton wrote: Hello, it seems (the patchbot has told me) that I am not a default trusted user. That must be the reason why the patchbot dos not look at my patches. Hi Frederic, I doubt you have been blacklisted. My own patchbot "rosinante" is currently not

Re: [sage-devel] SageManifolds v0.2

2013-09-12 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
Le jeudi 12 septembre 2013 18:30:21 UTC+2, vdelecroix a écrit : > > > > Still missing: > > > >- the implementation of Sage Parent/Element scheme for a better > >integration in Sage > > Do you need some help for that point? It is not clear what to do. On a > manifold you have points (

[sage-devel] Re: SageManifolds v0.2

2013-09-12 Thread Simon King
Hi Vincent, On 2013-09-12, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Still missing: >> >>- the implementation of Sage Parent/Element scheme for a better >>integration in Sage > > Do you need some help for that point? It is not clear what to do. On a > manifold you have points

[sage-devel] Re: not trusted anymore ?

2013-09-12 Thread Frédéric Chapoton
Hello, thanks for your answer, but I do not think that there is any problem now with accents in title of tickets (see #14318) Here are two facts: * my patches are no longer considered since the first september * I am not in the list of 93 default_trusted_users that the patchbot uses if not tol

[sage-devel] SageManifolds v0.2

2013-09-12 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
Hi, We have just posted a new version (0.2) of SageManifolds at http://sagemanifolds.obspm.fr SageManifolds is an attempt to include differential geometry and tensor calculus in Sage (cf. the initial postand the trac 14865

Re: [sage-devel] SageManifolds v0.2

2013-09-12 Thread Vincent Delecroix
Hi Eric, > We have just posted a new version (0.2) of SageManifolds at > http://sagemanifolds.obspm.fr > SageManifolds is an attempt to include differential geometry and tensor > calculus in Sage (cf. the initial > postand the > trac

[sage-devel] Finite State Machines, Automata, Transducers (review request)

2013-09-12 Thread Daniel Krenn
Dear all, for the past 18 month we (our working group) developed a package adding support for finite state machines, especially finite automata and transducers. We've opened a trac ticket and submitted the code, see #15078 (link [1] below), and set its status to "needs_review". The patch itself do

[sage-devel] not trusted anymore ?

2013-09-12 Thread Frédéric Chapoton
Hello, it seems (the patchbot has told me) that I am not a default trusted user. That must be the reason why the patchbot dos not look at my patches. I feel a bit sad :( Not so long ago, the patchbot was working on my patches very often. If this is not a deliberate banishment (I hope not, I