On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 4:38 PM, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 4:34 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> Isn't one way all we need? The idea is that when one gets an account
>> on trac, one automatically gets access to the wiki as well. There is
>> no notion of creating an account o
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 4:34 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Isn't one way all we need? The idea is that when one gets an account
> on trac, one automatically gets access to the wiki as well. There is
> no notion of creating an account on the wiki.
>
That is what I thought too, but then I noticed th
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 4:29 PM, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
> From what I could tell, the wiki is simply looking at a single file. If
> whoever setup the wiki to use trac's login info (which I think I recall
> being Mike Hansen) wants to chime in here and let us know that would be
> appreciated.
>
> I
>From what I could tell, the wiki is simply looking at a single file. If
whoever setup the wiki to use trac's login info (which I think I recall
being Mike Hansen) wants to chime in here and let us know that would be
appreciated.
I've created a daemon on the trac server that will do one direction
Hi,
mhh, I think the best option is indeed to ask on [sage-devel] directly, either
for help in general or specific questions. But also CCed Simon King who might
be interested.
Cheers,
Martin
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: [sage-devel] Re: SymbolicData
Date: Sunday 1
Hi Darij,
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 08:39:02PM +0200, Darij Grinberg wrote:
> One way to do it, of course, is by making the symmetric group algebra
> an AlgebraWithRealizations (like most combinatorial Hopf algebras),
> and implement the two different conventions as two different
> realizati
On Sunday, July 14, 2013 6:52:49 AM UTC+2, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
>
> … so please let me know if there is anything missing or odd after the
> switch
>
A while back I was asking about the sagemath wiki, which is synchronizing
it's users with the one from trac. How is this handled now?
H
--
On Sunday, July 14, 2013 4:49:36 AM UTC-4, vdelecroix wrote:
> As Volker Braun mentioned, the main problem is that it is possible to
> write p(i) in Sage! I suggest that we remove the __call__ attribute of
> permutations (it does not exists in GAP but I do not know for other
> softwares). If we
Hi all,
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
> Hey everyone who's following #14772,
>I don't want to change the patch, which has the multiplication in a
> GlobalOptions class, since it's just lifts the previous options up (a
> standard dict). Thus any change should depend
Here is a Sage argument in favor of right action: vectors are row vectors
in Sage (on which matrices act on right). There has been a choice to
silently ignore transposition and we can write vA or Av in Sage... but
still the natural way to do it is through right action (if we do it the
other way
On 2013-07-13, Darij Grinberg wrote:
> Hi Dima,
>
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> IMHO it's a not as obsolete convention as you seem to imply; isn't e.g. Magma
>> using the same convention as GAP?
>> Not mentioning a lot of group theory literature...
>
> I don't know a
11 matches
Mail list logo
