[sage-devel] Re: Changes to element wrapper and matrix group element

2013-05-09 Thread Volker Braun
I'd be grateful if any changes to matrix groups would be on top of the libgap-matrix-group patches at #14014 On Friday, May 10, 2013 12:51:58 AM UTC+1, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > >As part of http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14519, we started > by wanting to swap the order of the arg

[sage-devel] QQ random_matrix()

2013-05-09 Thread Kenneth Lin
Hey everyone, So I'm not sure if I discovered two bugs in random_matrix or if I'm reading the documentation wrong. Firstly, in the documentation, it says: Random integer matrices. With no arguments, the majority of the >entries are -1 and 1, never zero, and rarely "large." > sage:

[sage-devel] Changes to element wrapper and matrix group element

2013-05-09 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
Hey everyone, As part of http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14519, we started by wanting to swap the order of the arguments for ElementWrapper. However in the course of fixing things, I've had to also swap the order for (abelian) matrix group element as well. The patch is not quite rea

[sage-devel] Strange deprecation warning in #14136

2013-05-09 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
Hey everyone, At http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14136 we are getting a strange deprecation warning that should not appear: doctest:201: DeprecationWarning: object.__init__() takes no parameters when running a doctest on a method that creates an instance of QSym. This only occur

[sage-devel] Re: Singular fails to build in Sage 5.9

2013-05-09 Thread arojas
El jueves, 9 de mayo de 2013 20:21:43 UTC+2, Pong escribió: > Hi Leif > > >     I haven't tried any of those. In fact, I just reinstall SAGE 5.8.1 which > is available on the Arch community. Does anyone here know who is maintaining > that package? It would be great if we get an update from the

[sage-devel] Re: Singular fails to build in Sage 5.9

2013-05-09 Thread Pong
Hi Leif I haven't tried any of those. In fact, I just reinstall SAGE 5.8.1 which is available on the Arch community. Does anyone here know who is maintaining that package? It would be great if we get an update from there soon as well. I will give your suggestion a try and hopefully I l

[sage-devel] Re: Solaris [SPARC] Sage 5.9 / ecl issue

2013-05-09 Thread leif
Rob McMahon wrote: On 09/05/2013 07:22, leif wrote: Rob McMahon wrote: Solaris 10 SPARC, with libffi and libiconv installed on the system already for other purposes. Having worked around the iconv issue (special case for solaris in iconv*/src/src/Makefile.in, make now dies compiling ecl with: .

[sage-devel] Re: Consistent failure of zn_poly in latest Sage

2013-05-09 Thread leif
Francois Bissey wrote: On 09/05/13 14:27, leif wrote: P.S.: I strongly doubt GCC's version matters here. If I were you I wouldn't be so sure. I became involved in that bug when I stumbled on a similar one porting to power7 http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14098 the version of gcc on

[sage-devel] Re: Which docstrings should be doctested

2013-05-09 Thread Simon King
On 2013-05-09, leif wrote: > Simon King wrote: >> PS: >> >> On 2013-05-09, Simon King wrote: >>> The disadvantage of this approach: It will only test stuff that can be >>> imported by Python---cdef methods do not appear in dir(O). >> >> And the worse disadvantage: This will only test importable m

[sage-devel] Re: Which docstrings should be doctested

2013-05-09 Thread leif
Simon King wrote: PS: On 2013-05-09, Simon King wrote: The disadvantage of this approach: It will only test stuff that can be imported by Python---cdef methods do not appear in dir(O). And the worse disadvantage: This will only test importable modules. It will not test files. Well, you jus

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Solaris [SPARC] Sage 5.9 / ecl issue

2013-05-09 Thread Rob McMahon
On 09/05/2013 07:22, leif wrote: Rob McMahon wrote: Solaris 10 SPARC, with libffi and libiconv installed on the system already for other purposes. Having worked around the iconv issue (special case for solaris in iconv*/src/src/Makefile.in, make now dies compiling ecl with: ... Although it is fi

[sage-devel] Re: Building Sage 5.9 fails on Mercurial

2013-05-09 Thread leif
Mike S wrote: On Wednesday, May 8, 2013 5:07:41 AM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote: Can you paste a (simple) command line session that exhibits the problem? If you're referring to the problem with IPython vomiting the symbol list with print commands, I just figured out what the problem was:

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 5.9 / ecl issue

2013-05-09 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Thursday, May 9, 2013 7:22:15 AM UTC+1, leif wrote: > > Rob McMahon wrote: > > Solaris 10 SPARC, with libffi and libiconv installed on the system > > already for other purposes. Having worked around the iconv issue > > (special case for solaris in iconv*/src/src/Makefile.in, make now dies

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Consistent failure of zn_poly in latest Sage

2013-05-09 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Thursday, May 9, 2013 4:46:02 AM UTC+1, William wrote: > > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Francois Bissey > > wrote: > > On 09/05/13 14:27, leif wrote: > >> Kwankyu Lee wrote: > >>> For example, can you stop everything on the computer and remote > log > >>> in to it from another

[sage-devel] Re: Singular fails to build in Sage 5.9

2013-05-09 Thread leif
Pong wrote: Oh... I see. I am ignorant on what various flags mean. Did you try to build the stand-alone/vanilla Singular configured with '--with-apint=gmp'? Let me summarize my problems and see if I get them right: 1) my gcc compiler confuses c and c++ programs. I don't think so, at lea