On 04/15/2013 07:33 AM, Kenneth Lin wrote:
Hi Sage development!
I'm new to the Sage development community. I've been using Sage for a
while now and I really like it, so I thought I'd try to help out and
contribute!
After using Sage a lot in my probability class, I realized that there
isn't a re
On Saturday, 13 April 2013 20:16:37 UTC+10, Volker Braun wrote:
> So whats global in GlobalOptions? Presumably the instance options are the
> same as the global options, just with a different scope? Is that
> implemented?
>
Yes, you are right, there is nothing intrinsically global in them an
Hi Sage development!
I'm new to the Sage development community. I've been using Sage for a while
now and I really like it, so I thought I'd try to help out and contribute!
After using Sage a lot in my probability class, I realized that there isn't
a really easy way to plot histograms in Sage. I
On Sunday, April 14, 2013 1:58:22 PM UTC+1, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> The default font seems to be a bitmap, and we could have a much better
> result if we only added \usepackage{times} in our default header.
>
Your pdflatex is set up wrong, or you haven't installed the CM Type 1 fonts.
--
You re
Come on guys, we cannot ask new users to know how to configure their own
latex header by adding "latex.add_to_preamble('\\usepackage{times}')" in
their init.sage file. And I don't care at all for "times" or anything else,
we can pick the font you like, but the default font that is being used
ri
On Apr 14, 5:58 am, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> I am playing with Latex through Sage these days, and notice that our
> default output is a bit ugly The default font seems to be a bitmap, and
> we could have a much better result if we only added \usepackage{times} in
> our default header.
This is m
I would say this is a bug. It's due to the fact that the actual output
matched by the ellipsis contains a float, and thus the number of expected
floats is different from the number actually found. See
sage.doctest.parsing.SageOutputChecker.check_output (line 670). I think
just deleting lines 670
On Sunday, April 14, 2013 5:58:22 AM UTC-7, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
> Hell everybody !!
>
> I am playing with Latex through Sage these days, and notice that our
> default output is a bit ugly The default font seems to be a bitmap, and
> we could have a much better result if we on
Hell everybody !!
I am playing with Latex through Sage these days, and notice that our
default output is a bit ugly The default font seems to be a bitmap, and
we could have a much better result if we only added \usepackage{times} in
our default header.
Just look at that :
view("Lo
Hi,
I just discovered that a doctest in 5.9beta5 with the # tol keyword is not
able to use the ellipsis properly. In particular, I tried to patch the
doctest in
sage/numerical/mip.pyx
at line 2031. The expected output contains the version string of GLPK which
I want to replace with the ellips
There is a somewhat interdisciplinary ticket for Weierstrass forms, in
addition to undergraduate algebraic geometry there are dependencies for
fast lattice polygons to review. Most of the code has been languishing on
trac for year(s):
http://trac.sagemath.org/3416
--
You received this message
11 matches
Mail list logo
