Re: [sage-devel] Re: Problem building Sage on FreeBSD

2013-04-04 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 05/04/2013 07:29, leif a écrit : Julien Puydt wrote: Le 05/04/2013 03:28, leif a écrit : Or otherwise ask John Cremona... ;-) I suggest to provide him a patch adding the #include at the top of one of the files. Yep, but better where int64_t is actually used, i.e., in the mentioned #else

[sage-devel] Re: Problem building Sage on FreeBSD

2013-04-04 Thread leif
Julien Puydt wrote: Le 05/04/2013 03:28, leif a écrit : Or otherwise ask John Cremona... ;-) I suggest to provide him a patch adding the #include at the top of one of the files. Yep, but better where int64_t is actually used, i.e., in the mentioned #else part in xmod.h, and probably some ot

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Problem building Sage on FreeBSD

2013-04-04 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 05/04/2013 03:28, leif a écrit : Or otherwise ask John Cremona... ;-) I suggest to provide him a patch adding the #include at the top of one of the files. If he didn't already answer, that means he's busy :-) Snark on #sagemath -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

[sage-devel] Re: Problem building Sage on FreeBSD

2013-04-04 Thread leif
leif wrote: FWIW, here on Linux (included by "interface.h") pulls in [indirectly, of course^TM], which defines int64_t et al. The same (or, more precisely, similar) is true on Solaris. -leif (xmod.h is only included by arith.h, which in turn includes interface.h, before xmod.h.) Or othe

[sage-devel] Re: Problem building Sage on FreeBSD

2013-04-04 Thread leif
leif wrote: Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: On Thursday, April 4, 2013 6:22:43 PM UTC+2, Snark wrote: Le 04/04/2013 17:52, Jean-Pierre Flori a �crit : > I'm currently trying to build Sage on FreeBSD and the eclib spkg failed > because it uses int64_t in eclib/xmod.h. > Including

[sage-devel] Re: Problem building Sage on FreeBSD

2013-04-04 Thread leif
Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: On Thursday, April 4, 2013 6:22:43 PM UTC+2, Snark wrote: Le 04/04/2013 17:52, Jean-Pierre Flori a �crit : > I'm currently trying to build Sage on FreeBSD and the eclib spkg failed > because it uses int64_t in eclib/xmod.h. > Including there solve

Re: [sage-devel] Problem building Sage on FreeBSD

2013-04-04 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 04/05/2013 12:11 AM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: On Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:55:26 PM UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: OK, so the solution is easy: add #include No need to look further, I'd say... What I find disturbing is that I never encountered it anwhere else. It seems that s

Re: [sage-devel] Problem building Sage on FreeBSD

2013-04-04 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:55:26 PM UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > OK, so the solution is easy: add > #include > > No need to look further, I'd say... > What I find disturbing is that I never encountered it anwhere else. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the G

Re: [sage-devel] sage-5.8 do not compile on lubuntu 12.10 --- does not find blas!

2013-04-04 Thread François Bissey
On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:04:30 Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen wrote: > Thanks! See inline below. > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:47 PM, François Bissey > > wrote: > > On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 23:41:06 Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen wrote: > >> see inline below. > > > > Not pretty. There is a bit of a mystery

Re: [sage-devel] sage-5.8 do not compile on lubuntu 12.10 --- does not find blas!

2013-04-04 Thread Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen
Thanks! See inline below. On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:47 PM, François Bissey wrote: > On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 23:41:06 Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen wrote: >> see inline below. > > Not pretty. There is a bit of a mystery as to why -latlas doesn't give you the > right libraries. libcblas should be linked

Re: [sage-devel] Problem building Sage on FreeBSD

2013-04-04 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
OK, so the solution is easy: add #include No need to look further, I'd say... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups

[sage-devel] Re: Error in the determinant of a simple 4x4 matrix

2013-04-04 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
Thanks for having set up a ticket for this. On Wednesday, April 3, 2013 7:16:31 AM UTC+2, Nils Bruin wrote: > > I guess someone should fix this at some point: > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14403 > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "s

Re: [sage-devel] sage-5.8 do not compile on lubuntu 12.10 --- does not find blas!

2013-04-04 Thread François Bissey
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 23:41:06 Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen wrote: > see inline below. Not pretty. There is a bit of a mystery as to why -latlas doesn't give you the right libraries. libcblas should be linked with libatlas, it is technically correct as is but should be handled better. I hope that V

Re: [sage-devel] sage-5.8 do not compile on lubuntu 12.10 --- does not find blas!

2013-04-04 Thread Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen
see inline below. On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:25 PM, François Bissey wrote: > On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 23:13:06 Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen wrote: >> This file as attachment here! >> > Can you do the following for me: > start a sage shell: go in /home/kjetil/sage/sage-5.8/ and type > ./sage -sh > Then g

Re: [sage-devel] sage-5.8 do not compile on lubuntu 12.10 --- does not find blas!

2013-04-04 Thread François Bissey
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 23:13:06 Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen wrote: > This file as attachment here! > Can you do the following for me: start a sage shell: go in /home/kjetil/sage/sage-5.8/ and type ./sage -sh Then get the output of the commands ldd -r local/lib/libcblas.so ldd -r local/lib/libatlas.so

Re: [sage-devel] Problem building Sage on FreeBSD

2013-04-04 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Thursday, April 4, 2013 10:41:04 PM UTC+2, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > > On Thursday, April 4, 2013 6:43:13 PM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote: >> >> Maybe something like -D__C99FEATURES__ works? See #14265 >> >> Good idea I'll give it a shot. > And nope, its not working. -- You received this

Re: [sage-devel] sage-5.8 do not compile on lubuntu 12.10 --- does not find blas!

2013-04-04 Thread François Bissey
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 23:00:47 Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen wrote: > Yes, in /home/kjetil/sage/sage-5.8/local/lib there are the > following (among others): > > libblas libcblas libatlas (.*) > > > ¿Why are they not picked up? Let's find out. Can you attach the "config.log" file located in

Re: [sage-devel] sage-5.8 do not compile on lubuntu 12.10 --- does not find blas!

2013-04-04 Thread Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen
Yes, in /home/kjetil/sage/sage-5.8/local/lib there are the following (among others): libblas libcblas libatlas (.*) ¿Why are they not picked up? Kjetil On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:52 PM, François Bissey wrote: > On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 18:56:33 Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen wrote: >> OS versio

Re: [sage-devel] sage-5.8 do not compile on lubuntu 12.10 --- does not find blas!

2013-04-04 Thread François Bissey
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 18:56:33 Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen wrote: > OS version information: > > kjetil@kjetil-HP-Pavilion-dv4-Notebook-PC:~$ lsb_release > LSB Version: > core-2.0-amd64:core-2.0-noarch:core-3.0-amd64:core-3.0-noarch:core-3.1-amd64 > :core-3.1-noarch:core-3.2-amd64:core-3.2-noarch:cor

Re: [sage-devel] Problem building Sage on FreeBSD

2013-04-04 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Thursday, April 4, 2013 6:43:13 PM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote: > > Maybe something like -D__C99FEATURES__ works? See #14265 > > Good idea I'll give it a shot. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

[sage-devel] some web/edu dev sage days

2013-04-04 Thread William Stein
Hi, I wanted to raise awareness about these two upcoming Sage Days in (beautiful in June!) Seattle: * Sage Days 48, Notebook Dev (June 17-21, 2013), Univ of Washington, Seattle http://wiki.sagemath.org/days48 * Sage Edu Days 5 (June 19-21, 2013), Univ of Washington, Seattle

[sage-devel] sage-5.8 do not compile on lubuntu 12.10 --- does not find blas!

2013-04-04 Thread Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen
OS version information: kjetil@kjetil-HP-Pavilion-dv4-Notebook-PC:~$ lsb_release LSB Version: core-2.0-amd64:core-2.0-noarch:core-3.0-amd64:core-3.0-noarch:core-3.1-amd64:core-3.1-noarch:core-3.2-amd64:core-3.2-noarch:core-4.0-amd64:core-4.0-noarch kjetil@kjetil-HP-Pavilion-dv4-Notebook-PC:~$ gcc

Re: [sage-devel] Problem building Sage on FreeBSD

2013-04-04 Thread Volker Braun
Maybe something like -D__C99FEATURES__ works? See #14265 On Thursday, April 4, 2013 5:35:58 PM UTC+1, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > Indeed, including inttypes.h solves the issue because it itself includes > stdint.h where this is defined. > Maybe some C99 hell on FreeBSD or with the GCC Sage buil

Re: [sage-devel] Problem building Sage on FreeBSD

2013-04-04 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Thursday, April 4, 2013 6:22:43 PM UTC+2, Snark wrote: > > Le 04/04/2013 17:52, Jean-Pierre Flori a �crit : > > I'm currently trying to build Sage on FreeBSD and the eclib spkg failed > > because it uses int64_t in eclib/xmod.h. > > Including there solves the problem. > > I think int64_

Re: [sage-devel] Problem building Sage on FreeBSD

2013-04-04 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 04/04/2013 17:52, Jean-Pierre Flori a écrit : I'm currently trying to build Sage on FreeBSD and the eclib spkg failed because it uses int64_t in eclib/xmod.h. Including there solves the problem. I think int64_t is supposed to come from stdint.h, and it's standard: http://en.wikibooks.org/wi

[sage-devel] Problem building Sage on FreeBSD

2013-04-04 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
Dear all, I'm currently trying to build Sage on FreeBSD and the eclib spkg failed because it uses int64_t in eclib/xmod.h. Including there solves the problem. I guess it's using the Sage's GCC. Is this a known issue? Looking at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/math/sage/ and with my

[sage-devel] Re: Clean up linestyle

2013-04-04 Thread P Purkayastha
On 04/03/2013 11:00 PM, Tobias Weich wrote: Hi, P Purkayastha nicely invited me to fix http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13834 and after I looked at it in more detail it really seemed to be easy enough as a starting point to contributio