[sage-devel] Re: Error in the determinant of a simple 4x4 matrix

2013-04-02 Thread Nils Bruin
I guess someone should fix this at some point: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14403 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr

Re: [sage-devel] change engine default value from 'latex' to 'pdflatex' for function view : any opposition?

2013-04-02 Thread Dan Drake
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 at 03:20PM -0700, Sébastien Labbé wrote: > Hi sage-devel, > > At #13713, it is proposed to change the engine default value from 'latex' > to 'pdflatex' for function view : any opposition? I just want to make sure > there is no reason out there we forget to consider. I would

[sage-devel] Re: change engine default value from 'latex' to 'pdflatex' for function view : any opposition?

2013-04-02 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2013-04-03, Volker Braun wrote: > --=_Part_860_23316503.1364947228432 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > I agree, nobody should be using anything but pdflatex nowadays to generate= >=20 > pdf. there is also xelatex, which typica

[sage-devel] Re: change engine default value from 'latex' to 'pdflatex' for function view : any opposition?

2013-04-02 Thread Volker Braun
I agree, nobody should be using anything but pdflatex nowadays to generate pdf. On Tuesday, April 2, 2013 11:20:39 PM UTC+1, Sébastien Labbé wrote: > At #13713, it is proposed to change the engine default value from 'latex' > to 'pdflatex' for function view : any opposition? I just want to make

[sage-devel] change engine default value from 'latex' to 'pdflatex' for function view : any opposition?

2013-04-02 Thread Sébastien Labbé
Hi sage-devel, At #13713, it is proposed to change the engine default value from 'latex' to 'pdflatex' for function view : any opposition? I just want to make sure there is no reason out there we forget to consider. See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13713 Sébastien -- You receive

Re: [sage-devel] Sage needed to start to install something

2013-04-02 Thread kcrisman
On Tuesday, April 2, 2013 1:43:16 PM UTC-4, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 04/02/2013 06:56 PM, kcrisman wrote: > > While looking at #7438 and friends, it was noticed that even on > > sage.math, where a certain spkg does build (unlike many places), a > > binary download Sage had to be run first

Re: [sage-devel] Sage needed to start to install something

2013-04-02 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 04/02/2013 06:56 PM, kcrisman wrote: While looking at #7438 and friends, it was noticed that even on sage.math, where a certain spkg does build (unlike many places), a binary download Sage had to be run first in order to run the script that changes the hard-coded paths from the buildbot. Woul

[sage-devel] Sage needed to start to install something

2013-04-02 Thread kcrisman
While looking at #7438 and friends, it was noticed that even on sage.math, where a certain spkg does build (unlike many places), a binary download Sage had to be run first in order to run the script that changes the hard-coded paths from the buildbot. Would it make sense to run that script (sag