Hello Sage Developers
Like last year, Sage will try to be part of GSoC 2013 again. For this, I'm
preparing the application which I'll have to submit until the end of this
week. What's missing for that are project proposals for students. These
proposals are as essential as the application and ne
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Francois Bissey
wrote:
> After much time spent finding why numpy 1.6.x didn't like sage
> and some nice cooperation with numpy upstream we have an upgrade path
> for numpy. It couldn't have happened before the merging of the new
> doctest framework. Numpy 1.7.0 ex
Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
The new doctesting framework (#12415) on Solaris gives lots of warnings like
sage -t --long devel/sage/sage/plot/plot.py
**
File "devel/sage/sage/plot/plot.py", line 236, in sage.plot.plot
Failed example:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 8:42 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Xavier Caruso
> wrote:
> > Dear Sage lovers,
> >
> > I've recently written several patches/packages related to p-adics
> > in Sage. Here is an overview of what I've done:
> >
> > . an implementation of Fro
Le dimanche 24 mars 2013, William Stein a écrit :
> > . an implementation of several useful decompositions of matrices
> > over p-adics (like Hermite form, Smith form, LU factorization)
>
> Is there a paper somewhere explaining how the algorithms you've
> implemented for p-adic "numerical an
Le dimanche 24 mars 2013, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
> If you want comments and feedback, please *do* submit them to Trac,
> preferably not as one big patch bomb, but separated on multiple
> tickets.
Ok, ok. I will do it.
> Also: are you aware of http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12555
>
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 2:25 AM, David Roe wrote:
> IPython has won the 2012 Free Software foundation award for the Advancement
> of Free Software
> (http://www.fsf.org/news/2012-free-software-award-winners-announced-2).
> Well deserved!
Thanks, David! I should add, though, that supposedly the a
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Xavier Caruso
wrote:
> Dear Sage lovers,
>
> I've recently written several patches/packages related to p-adics
> in Sage. Here is an overview of what I've done:
>
> . an implementation of Frobenius endormophisms over p-adic
> rings (as morphism - the method x
On 2013-03-24 12:59, Xavier Caruso wrote:
> Until now, I've not submitted these patches to the trac server. I
> actually would like to have some feedback before.
If you want comments and feedback, please *do* submit them to Trac,
preferably not as one big patch bomb, but separated on multiple ticke
Dear Sage lovers,
I've recently written several patches/packages related to p-adics
in Sage. Here is an overview of what I've done:
. an implementation of Frobenius endormophisms over p-adic
rings (as morphism - the method x.frobenius() already exists)
. an implementation of Newton polyg
Helloo Dima !!!
Yesterday I went to walk around the Calanques near the University of
Marseille, and it did me good ! I am now wandering homeless in Paris and
that's another story :-P
But the thing is that I thought a bit about our conversation here
and I think I u
The new doctesting framework (#12415) on Solaris gives lots of warnings like
sage -t --long devel/sage/sage/plot/plot.py
**
File "devel/sage/sage/plot/plot.py", line 236, in sage.plot.plot
Failed example:
(g1+g2).show(ticks=pi
12 matches
Mail list logo
