Re: [sage-devel] Google groups suck

2013-03-11 Thread William Stein
On Mar 11, 2013 9:11 PM, "Stephen Montgomery-Smith" wrote: > > This is the 4th time I tried sending this message. I think it gets > flagged as spam by google. > It was indeed marked as spam. Incidentally I've never heard of anybody using sage on freebsd, so I'm glad you got so far... > I have

[sage-devel] Re: Google groups suck

2013-03-11 Thread leif
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: This is the 4th time I tried sending this message. I think it gets flagged as spam by google. I have a problems building docs on sage-5.8.beta4. On FreeBSD, the doc creation process freezes. I cannot tell you where, because the text must be flagged as spam. If

Re: [sage-devel] Google groups suck

2013-03-11 Thread Ivan Andrus
FWIW, I saw all of them. Sadly I can't help you. -Ivan On Mar 9, 2013, at 1:36 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > This is the 4th time I tried sending this message. I think it gets > flagged as spam by google. > > I have a problems building docs on sage-5.8.beta4. On FreeBSD, the doc >

[sage-devel] Problems building docs on sage-5.8.beta4

2013-03-11 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Building on FreeBSD, the doc creation process freezes after this point: [history_a] loading pickled environment... not yet created [history_a] building [inventory]: targets for 1 source files that are out of date [history_a] updating environment: 1 added, 0 changed, 0 removed [history_a] reading s

[sage-devel] Problems building docs on sage-5.8.beta4

2013-03-11 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Building on FreeBSD, the doc creation process freezes after this point: [history_a] loading pickled environment... not yet created [history_a] building [inventory]: targets for 1 source files that are out of date [history_a] updating environment: 1 added, 0 changed, 0 removed [history_a] reading s

[sage-devel] Problems building docs on sage-5.8.beta4

2013-03-11 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Building on FreeBSD, the doc creation process freezes after this point: [history_a] writing output... [100%] index [history_a] dumping object inventory... done [history_a] build succeeded. P.S. I sent this email twice before. Perhaps google flagged it as spam. -- You received this messag

[sage-devel] Google groups suck

2013-03-11 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
This is the 3rd time I tried sending this message. I think it gets flagged as spam by google. I have a problems building docs on sage-5.8.beta4. On FreeBSD, the doc creation process freezes after this point: [history_a] writing output... [100%] index [history_a] dumping object inventory...

[sage-devel] Google groups suck

2013-03-11 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
This is the 4th time I tried sending this message. I think it gets flagged as spam by google. I have a problems building docs on sage-5.8.beta4. On FreeBSD, the doc creation process freezes. I cannot tell you where, because the text must be flagged as spam. If this when gets through, I'll try

[sage-devel] Re: GSOC 2013

2013-03-11 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2013-03-08, mmarco wrote: > IIRC, the call for projects of Google summer of code was last year > around march or april. Should we start to get prepared for this? > > As a suggestion for possible projects, I'd propose improving the integration of semidefinite programming solvers in Sage, creat

[sage-devel] Re: GSOC 2013

2013-03-11 Thread Volker Braun
In practice, I think you can use either and I never ran into any major obstacles with either. IMHO Qt is the best fit if you want a C++ toolkit, since it is natively written in C++. If you want to use another language then you'll invariably find that the C++ object model is slightly different t

[sage-devel] Re: python3

2013-03-11 Thread Jesus Torrado
FYI, matplotlib now supports Python 3: http://matplotlib.org/users/whats_new.html#python-3-x-support On Monday, March 12, 2012 3:39:33 AM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote: > > > > On Mar 10, 12:23 pm, William Stein wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Keshav Kini > wrote: > > > William Stein wr

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage Days 46

2013-03-11 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:56 AM, kcrisman wrote: > > > On Monday, March 11, 2013 12:28:54 PM UTC-4, William wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Volker Braun wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Monday, March 11, 2013 12:17:04 PM UTC-4, William wrote: >> >> >> >> > And the relationship between SageM

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage Days 46

2013-03-11 Thread kcrisman
On Monday, March 11, 2013 12:28:54 PM UTC-4, William wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Volker Braun > > > wrote: > > > > > > On Monday, March 11, 2013 12:17:04 PM UTC-4, William wrote: > >> > >> > And the relationship between SageMathCloud and https://salv.us/ is > ... ? > >>

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage Days 46

2013-03-11 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > > > On Monday, March 11, 2013 12:17:04 PM UTC-4, William wrote: >> >> > And the relationship between SageMathCloud and https://salv.us/ is ... ? >> >> equality > > > Isn't it identity? ("is" vs "==") Not exactly, since with the name change, c

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage Days 46

2013-03-11 Thread Volker Braun
On Monday, March 11, 2013 12:17:04 PM UTC-4, William wrote: > > > And the relationship between SageMathCloud and https://salv.us/ is ... > ? > > equality Isn't it identity? ("is" vs "==") -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage Days 46

2013-03-11 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 6:15 AM, kcrisman wrote: > Nice putting this up; maybe there should be an archive on the wiki where > other previous reports live, a nice resource. > >> >> * Jason Grout: I worked quite a bit with William and Keith on making >> the Sage Cell Server scalable and fault-tole

[sage-devel] Re: Bug in simbolic equations.

2013-03-11 Thread mmarco
You are right, it failed in an older version, but seems to be fixed in the current one. On 11 mar, 14:17, kcrisman wrote: > On Monday, March 11, 2013 8:24:20 AM UTC-4, mmarco wrote: > > > There is a bug in dealing with simbolic equations: > > > sage: var('a,x') > > (a, x) > > sage: x==-a > > x ==

[sage-devel] Re: Bug in simbolic equations.

2013-03-11 Thread kcrisman
On Monday, March 11, 2013 8:24:20 AM UTC-4, mmarco wrote: > > There is a bug in dealing with simbolic equations: > > sage: var('a,x') > (a, x) > sage: x==-a > x == -a > sage: T=[x==-a] > sage: T > [x == -a] > sage: x==-a in T > x == -a > sage: (x==-a) in T > True > sage: (x==-2*a) in

[sage-devel] Re: Sage Days 46

2013-03-11 Thread kcrisman
Nice putting this up; maybe there should be an archive on the wiki where other previous reports live, a nice resource. > * Jason Grout: I worked quite a bit with William and Keith on making > the Sage Cell Server scalable and fault-tolerant, including writing > a new database adapter and

[sage-devel] Re: GSOC 2013

2013-03-11 Thread mmarco
Just for curiosity: what advantages has pyGTK over pyQt? I have some experience on pyQt, so maybe i could help with that too. On 11 mar, 01:44, Volker Braun wrote: > Shipping the .net / mono runtime adds about the same order of magnitude as > PyGTK, QT+Python bindings, or Java JRE for that matter

[sage-devel] Bug in simbolic equations.

2013-03-11 Thread mmarco
There is a bug in dealing with simbolic equations: sage: var('a,x') (a, x) sage: x==-a x == -a sage: T=[x==-a] sage: T [x == -a] sage: x==-a in T x == -a sage: (x==-a) in T True sage: (x==-2*a) in T True sage: (x==a) in T False sage: (x==-2*a) == (x==-a) True Any clue about this? -- You recei