Re: [sage-devel] lazy importing modules / segfault with lazy import

2013-03-10 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Hi Robert! On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 12:49:41AM -0800, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > Could you try running this with sage -gdb? I should have done this right from the beginning. This is definitely an infinite recursion: #61576 0x7fffe7debc23 in __pyx_pf_4sage_4misc_11lazy_import_10LazyImpo

[sage-devel] Re: GSOC 2013

2013-03-10 Thread Volker Braun
Shipping the .net / mono runtime adds about the same order of magnitude as PyGTK, QT+Python bindings, or Java JRE for that matter. A drop in the bucket compared to the Sage install that it is supposed to manage. And IHMO the question is not how to save a few megabytes of disk space, but how to

[sage-devel] New sage-mode release fixing breakage on Sage 5.7

2013-03-10 Thread Ivan Andrus
Dear Sage Emacs Users, I finally made a new official release of sage-mode v0.9. This includes fixes for working with the new ipython. Without these changes tab completion is broken in Sage 5.7 and later. Because of this breakage I have changed the ticket from enhancement to defect. *gasp*

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Problems building docs on sage-5.8.beta4

2013-03-10 Thread John H Palmieri
On Sunday, March 10, 2013 11:25:35 AM UTC-7, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > I think it may well be related to the semaphore issue. But if that is the > case, it might take more time to fix than I have right now. So for a > while, I guess the FreeBSD port of sage will stay with 5.7. > > I

[sage-devel] Re: GSOC 2013

2013-03-10 Thread Timo Kluck
Op zondag 10 maart 2013 19:40:41 UTC+1 schreef mmarco het volgende: > > > > * noncommutative / supercommutative variables in expressions, (say pq - > qp > > = i) > > That is already supported in g-algebras. Look for the documentation of > FreeAlgebra.g_algebra > > That looks great! It would b

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSOC 2013

2013-03-10 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 10/03/2013 19:35, mmarco a écrit : I am not sure pyGTK (or pyQT, or any other python bindings) is the way to go. As you said, it would require to install pyGTK, but also GTK itself and python. I think that is overkill. I think that a windows native program, or maybe something writen in the .NE

[sage-devel] Re: Problems building docs on sage-5.8.beta4

2013-03-10 Thread leif
Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote: Another reason I might put this off a while is because my current smtp server is not being accepted by google groups or gmail. All this frustration adds up to make me want to put this off a while. Well, there's also news.gmane.org, at least for sage-{devel,su

[sage-devel] Re: GSOC 2013

2013-03-10 Thread mmarco
>  * noncommutative / supercommutative variables in expressions, (say pq - qp > = i) That is already supported in g-algebras. Look for the documentation of FreeAlgebra.g_algebra -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe fr

[sage-devel] Re: GSOC 2013

2013-03-10 Thread mmarco
I am not sure pyGTK (or pyQT, or any other python bindings) is the way to go. As you said, it would require to install pyGTK, but also GTK itself and python. I think that is overkill. I think that a windows native program, or maybe something writen in the .NET framework (making sure that it also wo

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Problems building docs on sage-5.8.beta4

2013-03-10 Thread Montgomery-Smith, Stephen
I think it may well be related to the semaphore issue. But if that is the case, it might take more time to fix than I have right now. So for a while, I guess the FreeBSD port of sage will stay with 5.7. In the mean time, if someone tells which part of the python code does the document buildin

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSOC 2013

2013-03-10 Thread Martin Albrecht
Note that Sage already has a wrapper around third-party linear solvers such as GLPK,CBC, Gurobi, CPLEX http://sagemath.org/doc/reference/numerical.html Also, there is a patch adding Constraint Integer Programming through SCIP here: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10879 On Su

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 5.7 on ARM

2013-03-10 Thread leif
Jeroen Demeyer wrote: On 2013-03-09 17:17, Julien Puydt wrote: Le 09/03/2013 10:54, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : On 2013-03-09 09:58, Julien Puydt wrote: What is the point of an automated test which reliably fails on many boxes? It doesn't *reliably* fail, it *rarely* fails. I have three comput

[sage-devel] Sage Days 46

2013-03-10 Thread William Stein
Hi Sage Developers, Here are the final status reports from the last Sage Days workshop, Sage Days 46, which was in Hawaii February 26-March 2, 2013 (see http://wiki.sagemath.org/sagedays46).I figure collecting and posting these after every workshop will help people to see what's in the queue f

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage 5.7 on ARM

2013-03-10 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2013-03-09 17:17, Julien Puydt wrote: > Le 09/03/2013 10:54, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : >> On 2013-03-09 09:58, Julien Puydt wrote: >>> What is the point of an automated test which reliably fails on many >>> boxes? >> It doesn't *reliably* fail, it *rarely* fails. > > I have three computers here