On Saturday, January 5, 2013 2:59:49 PM UTC-5, Nicholas Kirchner wrote:
>
> I've taken a look at trac ticket 11026, and I'll comment there as soon as
> my account is approved. For now:
>
>>
>>
That's awesome! Up to now, I've basically had to be the reviewer for the
Mac App tickets, and unfort
On Jan 5, 2013, at 8:59 PM, Nicholas Kirchner wrote:
> I've taken a look at trac ticket 11026, and I'll comment there as soon as my
> account is approved. For now:
>
> I'm on OS X Lion, using the Browser bundled with Sage.app.
>
> 1. It does start and stop the server. Starting the server ini
I've taken a look at trac ticket 11026, and I'll comment there as soon as
my account is approved. For now:
I'm on OS X Lion, using the Browser bundled with Sage.app.
1. It does start and stop the server. Starting the server initializes
three python2.7 processes. Two of them are ~100MB and on
> * delete 'RingElement.abs'. Then any subclass that wants absolute
> values needs to implement __abs__ (that's necessary anyway) and, if it
> wants the method accessible in another form as well, also a suitable
> 'abs'. I could see why that's not so desirable
+1 !
Nathann
--
You received this
On Jan 5, 1:27 am, Volker Braun wrote:
> Also, x.__abs__() is just the Python magic method for abs(x). The function
> call syntax abs(x) will always call __abs__ and return an AttributeError if
> it is not defined. So all we have is an x.abs() method that behaves exactly
> like abs(x), for better
On 1/4/13 8:11 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Dan Drake mailto:ddr...@pugetsound.edu>> wrote:
On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 at 11:30AM +, John Cremona wrote:
> Have others found a good solution to this?
I don't have a good solution (yet), but for some time I'v
Le 05/01/2013 16:23, Volker Braun a écrit :
Fundamentally, the Xeon Phi programming model is not really that much
different from OpenCL/Cuda. You send data to the coprocessor card, run
some code there, and pull back the result to the host CPU. It doesn't
speed up anything that is not specifically
Fundamentally, the Xeon Phi programming model is not really that much
different from OpenCL/Cuda. You send data to the coprocessor card, run some
code there, and pull back the result to the host CPU. It doesn't speed up
anything that is not specifically targeted at the coprocessor card.
If you
The Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC) is opening its Stampede cluster
on Monday. Many of its nodes have the new Intel "Many Integrated Core"
(MIC) coprocessor, which has more than fifty processor cores and shared
memory. It's like a GPU accelerator, but easier. TACC is giving two days
o
On 2013-01-05, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Dima,
>
> On 2013-01-05, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> On 2013-01-05, Simon King wrote:
>>> sage: a.abs # but that's good:
>>> NotImplemented
>>
>> this is still a hack, as R() might in principle not have anything to do
>> with abs(). In such a case NotIm
Hi Dima,
On 2013-01-05, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On 2013-01-05, Simon King wrote:
>> sage: a.abs # but that's good:
>> NotImplemented
>
> this is still a hack, as R() might in principle not have anything to do
> with abs(). In such a case NotImplemented is misleading, and it better
> be t
On 2013-01-05, Simon King wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On 2013-01-05, john_perry_usm wrote:
>> thinking of how java interfaces & multiple inheritance work:
>> wouldn't it be possible to have an interface orabstract class
>> that defines an abstract function abs, along with associated
>> functions that r
Hi John,
On 2013-01-05, john_perry_usm wrote:
> thinking of how java interfaces & multiple inheritance work:
> wouldn't it be possible to have an interface orabstract class
> that defines an abstract function abs, along with associated
> functions that require an abs functions, then declare in th
Can you post your updated spkgs
to http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13309, or at least the diffs?
On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 12:26:12 PM UTC, Robert Zeier wrote:
>
> I ended up patching also python and R in the same way as mercurial.
> @Volker: Thanks for showing me how to do this.
On Saturday, January 5, 2013 8:45:47 AM UTC, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> What the hell ? You are *NOT* supposed to implement an abs() method,
> because such a method does not necessarily make sense !
>
There is certainly an argument to be made that abs() should or should not
be defined by default. B
I know I've fixed this before. It took a while to find because it made it into
the patch at #11026 (which would be a great ticket to have finished). It's
there because the issue came up during testing. So if you have some time it
would be great to get it reviewed. IIRC it only needed to be t
> Naming consistency. It makes it clear that you are supposed to implement
> absolute value through __abs__() and not norm() or absolute_value() etc.
O_O
What the hell ? You are *NOT* supposed to implement an abs() method,
because such a method does not necessarily make sense !
And by the way, r
On Saturday, January 5, 2013 4:50:35 AM UTC, Nils Bruin wrote:
> Perhaps more importantly: What is to be gained with the added
> indirection of abs
Naming consistency. It makes it clear that you are supposed to implement
absolute value through __abs__() and not norm() or absolute_value() etc.
18 matches
Mail list logo
